Poll: What was the turning point of World War 2?

Recommended Videos

Prometherion

New member
Jan 7, 2009
533
0
0
In your opinion, what was the most pivitol battle or operation which led to the downfall of the axis forces? Personally I would go for the Defence of Moscow in 1941, as it proved that Blitzkrieg could be defeated and the Soviet command structure remained intact which enabled further operations. If its not on the poll type it in. E.g. Battle of the Atlantic or whatever.
 

GruntOwner

New member
Feb 22, 2009
599
0
0
I agree with Moscow, though I think that the Russian invasion in general was one massive "Screw you" to the german war machine. Compared to Germany, Japan and Italy were really just there on the sideline as far as it went "World War" wise.
 

Jacklin

New member
Dec 10, 2008
152
0
0
what the f--- is wrong with you
go to a non biased school and learn some fact buddy, D-day was so small compared to Stalingrad, and the battle for Moscow
 

Prometherion

New member
Jan 7, 2009
533
0
0
McCa said:
Where's D-day?
By 1944 the Germans were retreating on all fronts, the Normandy landings ended the war quicker, but they did not turn the tide of the war. Im not saying it wasnt important, but the Wehrmacht was definatly on the back foot in 1944.
 

Keewa

New member
Nov 6, 2008
64
0
0
Stalingrad for the Eastern front
El Alamein for the African theatre
Battle of Britain in the European theatre.
 

Lord George

New member
Aug 25, 2008
2,734
0
0
The battle of Britain in my opinion as if we had lost then England would have dropped out of the war or been conquered. This meant Hitler might never have turned to the Russian front but would probably have taken over the rest of Europe and then who knows what would have happened
 

Hunde Des Krieg

New member
Sep 30, 2008
2,442
0
0
Jacklin said:
what the f--- is wrong with you
go to a non biased school and learn some fact buddy, D-day was so small compared to Stalingrad, and the battle for Moscow
Size of battle says nothing about any kind of tactical signifigance. Yes the battles in Russia helped to decimate the Nazis but the invasion at Normandy gave the other allies a tactical foothold in Europe. Once they invaded Nazi Germany was doomed, the Russians could have done it alone, but they didn't and the war ended much faster the way it did. Also D-Day and the invasion had the largest mobilization of any military ever. Ever.
 

Mariena

New member
Sep 25, 2008
930
0
0
Prometherion said:
McCa said:
Where's D-day?
By 1944 the Germans were retreating on all fronts, the Normandy landings ended the war quicker, but they did not turn the tide of the war. Im not saying it wasnt important, but the Wehrmacht was definatly on the back foot in 1944.
I'm with you. While I guess we can thank the allies for putting more pressure on the Germans by opening another front in the west, the Soviets were pushing the Germans back single handedly. I wouldn't say that D-Day was unimportant, but it probably mattered very little.

However, we can thank the Americans for the war they fought in the Pacific.

Keewa said:
Stalingrad for the Eastern front
El Alamein for the African theatre
Battle of Britain in the European theatre.
And this. Monty did a good job kicking the Germans out of Africa.
 

JB1528

New member
Mar 17, 2009
186
0
0
Stalingrad in my opinion. It was Germany's first major defeat, it also greatly demoralized the Nazi army as a whole, and it hurt their confidence in winning a quick war against Russia.
 

Wicky_42

New member
Sep 15, 2008
2,468
0
0
If Britain had been invaded and occupied, I sincerely doubt the Americans would have been able to invade Europe at all. With German airbases all across Britain, the US would have had a hard time moving any ships near the European coast. D-Day would have been impossible, and with no forces tied up to defend France against such an invasion, the Russian attack might not have gone so well.

Personally, the US joining the war effort was the major turning point - a large influx of men and materiels bolstered the small, flagging British army, providing the sheer numbers necessary to make progress on the Western front. Of course, their initial reluctance to listen to British advice and use of WW1 tactics meant they were a bit of a liability to start with, but by the end they were a most powerful ally - particularly because prior to joining the war they had had several years of getting fat from selling weapons and goods to both sides.

That said, I think I have to agree that Hitler turning on the USSR was a more devastating move for Germany. If he had been able to focus the bulk of his army on the Western front then maybe even American support might not have been enough.
 

Rajin Cajun

New member
Sep 12, 2008
1,157
0
0
The Battle of Moscow easily trumps all. While Stalingrad was important especially with the destruction of a whole 6th Army under Paulus the Battle of Moscow was the first real blow to German Morale and the bogging down of Army Group Center and North from that point forward.
 

Rajin Cajun

New member
Sep 12, 2008
1,157
0
0
Hunde Des Krieg said:
Jacklin said:
what the f--- is wrong with you
go to a non biased school and learn some fact buddy, D-day was so small compared to Stalingrad, and the battle for Moscow
Size of battle says nothing about any kind of tactical signifigance. Yes the battles in Russia helped to decimate the Nazis but the invasion at Normandy gave the other allies a tactical foothold in Europe. Once they invaded Nazi Germany was doomed, the Russians could have done it alone, but they didn't and the war ended much faster the way it did. Also D-Day and the invasion had the largest mobilization of any military ever. Ever.
That is honestly wrong Normandy was no where near the biggest military mobilization it was only 250,000 Men total. Operation Barbarossa was around a million.
 

Prometherion

New member
Jan 7, 2009
533
0
0
Im quite surprised no-one mentioned Kursk yet. It was the final attempt to stablise the frontline on the Eastern front, which ended in failure because Soviet spies learnt of the attack beforehand. It was the final major offensive of the Eastern campaign.
 

Hunde Des Krieg

New member
Sep 30, 2008
2,442
0
0
Rajin Cajun said:
Hunde Des Krieg said:
Jacklin said:
what the f--- is wrong with you
go to a non biased school and learn some fact buddy, D-day was so small compared to Stalingrad, and the battle for Moscow
Size of battle says nothing about any kind of tactical signifigance. Yes the battles in Russia helped to decimate the Nazis but the invasion at Normandy gave the other allies a tactical foothold in Europe. Once they invaded Nazi Germany was doomed, the Russians could have done it alone, but they didn't and the war ended much faster the way it did. Also D-Day and the invasion had the largest mobilization of any military ever. Ever.
That is honestly wrong Normandy was no where near the biggest military mobilization it was only 250,000 Men total. Operation Barbarossa was around a million.
Okay... Largest Amphibious Invasion/mobilization... there I was more specific. happy now?