After doing some research I have learned that you were right and my teachers were kind of dumb in stating that Antarctica is solid ice. On to another note:Froggy Slayer said:
The Carchardontosaurus may have been smaller than the Spinosaurus, however the Spinosaurus mainly ate fish and sea creatures (Perhaps not ALL, due to the different species, of course). If the creatures were to fight on equal footing (neither with any wounds, same age), then the Carcharodontosaurs may have had a size advantage! Spinosaurs are estimated to be between 41 feet and 59 wheras Carcharodontosaurs sit between 39 and 43 feet. If real Spinosaurs sat at the smaller end of the spectrum, than the idea of a Carcharodontosaur outliving a Spinosaurus isn't very impressive. I understand weight would be a more important factor, however there are huge ranges on the estimated weights for both predators. The Carchardontosaurus was good, but you give the Spinosaurus faaaar too much credit.Froggy Slayer said:
http://www.prehistoric-wildlife.com/species/s/spinosaurus.html
http://theropods.blogspot.com/2011/03/theropod-size-part-ii.html
http://theropods.blogspot.com/2011/03/theropod-size-part-ii.html
