Poll: Which is more humiliating?

Recommended Videos

Traun

New member
Jan 31, 2009
659
0
0
doomspore98 said:
I'd say the old guy for one reason. If your playing with an idiot kid who's yelling into his headset and your getting killed by him, your getting killed for two reasons
1) he spends every living hour playing that game and is actually pretty good at it or...
2) Your distracted by his retarded monkey screams and for that reason your getting killed

if you get killed by an old guy you have another two reasons why you fail
1) he's actually pretty good at the game
2) YOU SUCK AT THIS GAME.

with the old guy there is a pretty big chance that you suck at the game and an 80 year old is better at it then you

I would also like to say that old people playing video games kicks ass
You know that there is a good chance that old geezer has 30+ years of gaming experience, right? Hell, the old geezer probably duked it out during the Quake era, solved Monkey Island and King's Quest, finished Rogue and has Age of Empires and Starcraft: Broodwar on his resume, not to mention finishing ALL the Ninja Guidans, there is nothing shameful to loose to him.

Obviously the kid, you have to justify yourself for loosing to him.
 

Iwata

New member
Feb 25, 2010
3,333
0
0
If you lose to a better player, age is not an issue. There is no humiliation involved.
 

Chimpzy_v1legacy

Warning! Contains bananas!
Jun 21, 2009
4,789
1
0
Neither is particularly humiliating, but getting owned by a kid is certainly more annoying because the chance he won't shut up about it is exponentially higher.