Father Time said:
Bullshit.
We have prisons, prisons have solitary confinement for the dangerous inmates. Killing someone does not work in removing their ideas or their influence from society (in fact it's been known to backfire). So you tell me what excuse is there for murdering someone.
You forget that there are some crime bosses who are so influential that they will never even be arrested, much less convicted, which is more what I was talking about.
Father Time said:
Yeah sorry, you being pissed off and feeling justified doesn't excuse murder. It's still completely unnecessary.
I never said that it excuses murder. It does, however, provide a justification. Not necessarily a good one, but a justification nonetheless, which is more than could be said of rape.
Father Time said:
The death penalty is not murder (although it's not justified), self defense is not murder.
What makes the death penalty any different from murdering a murderer? Sure it's state action rather than vigilantism, but you get the same end result.
Father Time said:
I'm going to put this out here.
A request to all of you people here who are saying that murdering a murderer is justified but rape is never justified.
Give me one good reason why murdering for revenge is OK while raping the murderer for the same reason wouldn't be OK.
Well, that would depend on whether or not you believe rape to be more evil than murder (hence this entire debate) . If rape is more evil, the eye-for-an-eye principle wouldn't apply, as you'd be inflicting a punishment greater than the crime. Murdering a murderer, on the other hand, does conform to that idea, as he/she killed someone and then someone killed him/her.