Poll: Who is in the right here?

Recommended Videos

Savagezion

New member
Mar 28, 2010
2,455
0
0
Sober Thal said:
All this is, in effect, is a fine (socially for sure, then monetarily, or time wise) for breaking terms he agreed to. All he has to do is pony up money for another XBL profiles' online functions, and he's left the same as he was the day before. Or he can wait till his subscription is up, and make a new profile then. That way he won't be out any money, he'll just be punished with time. If his social status (gamertag and score) is sooo important to him, he shouldn't be trolling using the same tag. This is a great way to instill a life long lesson in him, due to his own violation of rules.

Oh yeah, and like I said in a previous post... Jewish and Iranian discord is not a joke. It may be to you, but not to others.
Dude, for someone so morally "high grounded", you need to quit claiming anyone who sees the legalities involved in favor of the consumer see Jewish and Iranian discord as a joke. You are committing the same "hostile" poor joke as the guy that got banned by EA that you are so clearly against. Because I see EA in a legal wrong here I clearly must disrespect Jewish and Iranian conflict. That is the same type of pigheaded statement that guy got banned for. According to your own logic you need to have your games taken from you so you can be taught a lesson.
 

Extra-Ordinary

Elite Member
Mar 17, 2010
2,065
0
41
Wow, that was disgraceful. Sure, the guy was being a dick on the forums, but I'm with everyone else: Ban him from the forums, not the game! If anything, he's going to troll the forums MORE now. At least give him a refund. At the VERY least, suspend him. I assume they banned him to try to stop behavior like his, but a ban is too much. And I know some of you will disagree, but a solid 24-hour suspension would be enough to tell me not to do it again.
 

midknight129

New member
Apr 1, 2011
49
0
0
1) His behavior on the forum doesn't reflect his behavior in-game. Wrong. He's demonstrated his willingness to be an asshat; I wouldn't want to play with that kind of person in any game.

2) He should get a refund for breaking the rules. Wrong. You make your bed, you have to sleep in it. The warranty on my car is contingent on me getting regularly scheduled maintenance. If I neglect that, they have every legal right to refuse warranty service. By the same token, EA has every legal right to refuse online service to someone who has demonstrated that they can't act responsibly online.

3) EA "went too far" by banning him from all EA online content. That's their prerogative... they own the online servers. His actions can drive away other players if tolerated. EA has shown that his actions won't be tolerated. Better to keep the good people and send the bad ones packing. If he tells all his friends that EA sucks... well, anyone who's friends with him is probably just as bad and it's a boon to drive them away before they can even bother the rest of us.
 

Savagezion

New member
Mar 28, 2010
2,455
0
0
Sober Thal said:
Savagezion said:
Sober Thal said:
All this is, in effect, is a fine (socially for sure, then monetarily, or time wise) for breaking terms he agreed to. All he has to do is pony up money for another XBL profiles' online functions, and he's left the same as he was the day before. Or he can wait till his subscription is up, and make a new profile then. That way he won't be out any money, he'll just be punished with time. If his social status (gamertag and score) is sooo important to him, he shouldn't be trolling using the same tag. This is a great way to instill a life long lesson in him, due to his own violation of rules.

Oh yeah, and like I said in a previous post... Jewish and Iranian discord is not a joke. It may be to you, but not to others.
Dude, for someone so morally "high grounded", you need to quit claiming anyone who sees the legalities involved in favor of the consumer see Jewish and Iranian discord as a joke. You are committing the same "hostile" poor joke as the guy that got banned by EA that you are so clearly against. Because I see EA in a legal wrong here I clearly must disrespect Jewish and Iranian conflict. That is the same type of pigheaded statement that guy got banned for. According to your own logic you need to have your games taken from you so you can be taught a lesson.
First of all: Take away my multiplayer for my XBLA profile Sober Thalantyr, I don't mind.

Second of all: What? When people quote me, and say "what he said wasn't bad" I disagree, like many others.

How am I being pig headed? I'll admit my head looks a tad animal like, and I have been known to be a sloppy eater.... but I haven't called out anyone's nationalities like the kid who got banned, I haven't threatened violence on anyone like the kid who got banned, I take threats seriously, UNlike the kid who got banned...

You wanna edit your post now?
No. You're making outlandish claims about anyone who can see the actual legality in this. ToS don't mean squat here. It is a contract signed under duress which makes the contract worthless as I have explained before. You may not have called out nationalities but you are making fabricated parallels to "thinking what EA is doing is illegal" with "thinking Jewish/Iranian conflict is a joke." Just like that guy was making fabricated parallels that "being in Iraq" was the same thing as "being IN Battlefield 3." At least that guy's comment was based on outdated world events whereas yours is based more on your own perception of anyone not agreeing with you is clearly cheering this guy on.
 

Jitters Caffeine

New member
Sep 10, 2011
999
0
0
torno said:
Wow, that was disgraceful. Sure, the guy was being a dick on the forums, but I'm with everyone else: Ban him from the forums, not the game! If anything, he's going to troll the forums MORE now. At least give him a refund. At the VERY least, suspend him. I assume they banned him to try to stop behavior like his, but a ban is too much. And I know some of you will disagree, but a solid 24-hour suspension would be enough to tell me not to do it again.
They didn't ban him from the game. They banned his EA account which he had connected to his XBox gamertag. Big difference
 

Vrach

New member
Jun 17, 2010
3,223
0
0
Sober Thal said:
Vrach said:
It's kinda like asking whether a guy jaywalking deserved to be shot by the cop.
Yeah, cuz having to make a new XBLA profile is like being shot.

Right.
Jaywalking is not like typing offensive text on a gaming board either, there's far less risk of causing a car accident for one. That's why we call it an analogy.

More importantly, it's not about making a new XBLA profile, it's about losing access to all EA games tied to two of his separate accounts (so generously joined at the grace of EA)
 

Savagezion

New member
Mar 28, 2010
2,455
0
0
Sober Thal said:
Savagezion said:
No. You're making outlandish claims about anyone who can see the actual legality in this. ToS don't mean squat here. It is a contract signed under duress which makes the contract worthless as I have explained before. You may not have called out nationalities but you are making fabricated parallels to thinking what EA is doing is illegal with thinking Jewish/Iranian conflict is a joke. Just like that guy was making fabricated parallels that being in Iraq was the same thing as being IN Battlefield 3. At least that guy's comment was based on outdated world events whereas yours is based more on your own perception of anyone not agreeing with you is clearly cheering this guy on.
Sorry, you lost me. I don't understand any of what you're saying now.

If you think what he said was just a harmless joke, I want you to know that there are people who don't agree.
Him: Living in Iraq = Being in Battlefield 3. (i.e. People in Iraq don't need the game, they live it.) That was his "joke/offense"
You: Seeing EA as legally in the wrong = Thinking Jewish and Iranian discord is a joke.

It is the SAME thing. Your quip = His quip.

I ain't saying it was a good joke, but yeah, it was a harmless joke. Just distasteful. Your parallels are both along the lines of fabricated (made up) slander
 

Kopikatsu

New member
May 27, 2010
4,924
0
0
Eternal Taros said:
Kopikatsu said:
Eternal Taros said:
He paid for the games. Being an asshole shouldn't exempt him from playing.
Way to abuse your powers EA.
]

Don't see why not. Punishing assholes for being assholes might make them less of an asshole.

Everyone wins!
I don't think so.
He paid for the game. This practice is like fining someone for being an asshole.

Say you bought a computer from an electronics store.
You go there and start being an asshole to the manager.
Would the manager then be justified in taking your computer away?
No. It wouldn't make sense because it is completely non-sequitur.
Someone being an asshole should not result in a loss of property.

I understand that EA hosts the servers, but he paid for that with his money.
He paid for the game and the servers. Being an asshole changes nothing.
They still have his money and as such should be giving him the privileges he paid for.
I'll repost this.

Kopikatsu said:
majora13 said:
Kopikatsu said:
It has nothing to do with defending corporations. It's 'Don't be a asshole and life is much easier for you.'

Edit: Clarification. It's defending other consumers from the one asshole consumer.
They aren't "protecting" anyone. Banning him from the forums is perfectltoy reasonable, banning him from playing games that he payed for and did not sign a contract or ToU form for and did not cause any trouble in is just an incredibly disproportionate action that will probably alienate customers and potential customers.
I have a problem with this line of reasoning. He paid for it, big fuckin' deal. That doesn't mean he gets a free ride.

It baffles me how people can say 'I/They paid for it, so they can do whatever they want.' then turn around and ***** about how the wealthy can do whatever they want. They're paying for shit, too. You can't have it both ways.

For video games, especially on the PC, you're buying the privilege to use something, not the actual game. He was an asshole, so he was punished for it.

Life lesson: Don't be an asshole.
Also, as I've said, what's wrong with him being fined for being an asshole? Since when has that been acceptable? Anyway- his paying $60 doesn't give him the right to harass OTHER people who have paid their $60. He paid as much as the people he's bothering have, so EA would rather get rid of a single person rather than risk him turning one or more people away from the game with his behavior.

I have zero problem with EA for doing this.
 

Tiamattt

New member
Jul 15, 2011
557
0
0
Sober Thal said:
Vrach said:
It's kinda like asking whether a guy jaywalking deserved to be shot by the cop.
Yeah, cuz having to make a new XBLA profile is like being shot.

Right.
How easy is that to do? I'm not being sarcastic or anything, I just never owned a x-boz/360 so I have absolutely no idea. Can he just make a new profile and play all his games online, just under a different name? Because if that's the case then this topic feels extremely pointless.......
 

Jitters Caffeine

New member
Sep 10, 2011
999
0
0
Tiamattt said:
Sober Thal said:
Vrach said:
It's kinda like asking whether a guy jaywalking deserved to be shot by the cop.
Yeah, cuz having to make a new XBLA profile is like being shot.

Right.
How easy is that to do? I'm not being sarcastic or anything, I just never owned a x-boz/360 so I have absolutely no idea. Can he just make a new profile and play all his games online, just under a different name? Because if that's the case then this topic feels extremely pointless.......
It honestly takes a decent amount time and money to do
 

Savagezion

New member
Mar 28, 2010
2,455
0
0
Sober Thal said:
Savagezion said:
Him: Living in Iraq = Being in Battlefield 3. (i.e. People in Iraq don't need the game, they live it.) That was his "joke/offense"
You: Seeing EA as legally in the wrong = Thinking Jewish and Iranian discord is a joke.

It is the SAME thing. Your quip = His quip.

I ain't saying it was a good joke, but yeah, it was a harmless joke. Just distasteful. Your parallels are both along the lines of fabricated (made up) slander
Yeah, you're really all over the place now...

Your interpretation of his 'comments' aside, I do not see EA as legally in the wrong, and I do not think Jewish and Iranian discord is a joke.

The dude implied Jewish and American planes were going to 'hit' his house, 'for real'. Why are you defending that? He has to make a new XBLA and EA account to play multiplayer, it's not a big deal.
Haha, that cracked me up. Let's see if I can simplify it further.
Him He is stating: Living in Iraq = Being in Battlefield 3. (i.e. People in Iraq don't need the game, they live it.) That was his "joke/offense"
You are stating: Seeing EA as legally in the wrong = Thinking Jewish and Iranian discord is a joke.
The = sign on a forum usually means "is the same as". I assumed someone with 4000+ posts would know that etiquette. That isn't your views, that is your claim. If it needs to be simplified even further... someone else is gonna have to do it because I can't break it down any further than that.

The "for real" part. Oh man, that is still funny. So if I tell someone that aliens are gonna invade their country tonight "for real", it is assault? You don't think he could possibly have meant "for real" as opposed to "in a game"?

It is a big deal because of Project 10 dollar - that copy of the game, is attached to his account. So trying to make a new one for multiplayer will cost 10 dollars. All because he said something against forum rules, not the actual stipulation of a contract that doesn't matter anyways (EULA). That is illegal. Period. Murdering someone trying to break in a car is still illegal no matter how justified you think it is because you are ridding the world of a thief. No matter what you think of this guy, EA is doing something illegal. It is possible that they are stepping on Microsofts toes here as well. But there isn't any use in explaining that unless you can grasp the previously mention concept.
 

eternal-chaplain

New member
Mar 17, 2010
384
0
0
I was going to say something, but I think I'm impressed by your Turtle-Tamer icon. I myself, regardless, am a Pastamancer.
 

Savagezion

New member
Mar 28, 2010
2,455
0
0
Kopikatsu said:
Also, as I've said, what's wrong with him being fined for being an asshole? Since when has that been acceptable? Anyway- his paying $60 doesn't give him the right to harass OTHER people who have paid their $60. He paid as much as the people he's bothering have, so EA would rather get rid of a single person rather than risk him turning one or more people away from the game with his behavior.

I have zero problem with EA for doing this.
Well, technically, we don't know if the guy he "harrassed/made a joke about" even paid for the game legitamately considering he was talking about going through black market channels to get a copy. It could have been stolen or whatnot considering the game was banned there. He may have just been poking fun at someone who robbed EA of $60.
 

Crazy

Member
Oct 4, 2011
727
0
1
I hope we all learned a valuable lesson here: Use a different email when trolling. Silly child wasn't using his brains.