Marv21 said:
cball11 said:
Marv21 said:
cball11 said:
Marv21 said:
cball11 said:
Manhattan and Eddie are my favorites, simply because they understand. They get it. Rorschach is my least favorite on the other hand. I don't dislike him, but he's a moral absolutist. And, like in Watchmen, a functioning society has no place for creatures like those.
Ahhhhh their is the question...is the society we live in functional....where rapists and murderers play the insanity card and get off mostly scott free...where America is getting dumber, and fatter (I think fat is FINE!, but dumb is bad), where we have to question every movement of our governement because they seem to just want out money and not the responisbility?
Does that sound like a functioning society to you?
It barely is in my opinion, but enought that people like these should exist, but only underground, where our law had no regard or power.
The word you want is "there". And the words underlined in red are insults to me. Fix it. Then I'll respond to your comments.
Put the red lines in and ill think about responding to you and fixing my mistake.
The typos. The failures. Oh look! You made a new one. You want I'll, not "ill". Fix those and you might have a point. Maybe.
Valid argument, however you cannot insist that I change my grammar to make up for the lack of thought on your part on what a fully functioning society is. If you continue to make remarks on my terrible grammar, as horrible as it is, you have not weight to your opinion if you do not support it. Grammar does give credibility, but to the extent in which you wield it as a weapon to which those who do not agree with you must conform to the laws of grammar. I am going to pull a Rosarch, and choose not to follow the rules of grammar considering they are quite chaotic. I must digress, you give me strong evidence to think your way, and I promise you I will go back and fix every gramtical error I can find.
Also
The typos. <----That sentence doesn't have a verb thus it is not a complete sentence
The failures <----" " " " " " " " " " " " "
My definition of a functioning society is one that bases its actions on rational thinking and provides the opportunity for everyone to better their lot. Rorschach does not think rationally, and most certainly goes out of his way to make people behave, or die, a choice which completely ruins a person's chance to get to a better place in their lives.
Oh, and you misspelled "cannot", "Rorschach", and "grammatical", you missed a verb in your second sentence somewhere, though I have no idea what you could have used, the rules of grammar are not chaotic, they are just very complex, and the use of fragment sentences is forgivable when the author is trying to emulate the spoken word.
Fuck you.
