No, I wouldn't buy it. It'd be like buying a CD player that couldn't play previously owned CD's. Most of the 360 games I own are new, however I've bought a few used ones. I honestly don't see how it could even be an issue. It would be like Ford deactivating all their cars once the original owner decided to sell it. Ikea making all their furniture collapse once someone sold it. Like it or not, once people buy something, they can do what they want with it as long as they're not violating copyright laws. Yes, copying the files off your disc, saving those files so that you can still use them, and then selling the files violates copyright law. Selling your original copy does not violate copyright laws, as you paid for it, it was bought. End of story. Creating a system that makes reselling videogames creates a dangerous precedent, which I recall was proposed last year to make pawnshops illegal to curb people stealing things and then selling them in pawnshops. That comprises an extremely small number of the population. I've seen people disagree with this notion on here, but once you buy something, that object becomes your property. No you can't copy it and resell it while retaining the original copy for your use, but you can sell that same copy if you so choose. By this logic, people couldn't even buy a fucking house. The bank owns the house, the bank gives you the mortgage, and then you pay the bank for it. Hell if the bank bought the house from another bank, they couldn't even sell it to you because it still belongs to the first bank. And it was built using materials bought from a store, but the wood came from trees, so the Earth owns the house! Yeah, it sounds ridiculous, but that's how I see this whole anti-used argument. It's fucking ridiculous. It's a slippery slope, and once you buy a product, that is your product. For fucks sake, it can be argued that taking a DVD over to a friends house is violating public use laws.