I hated the first bioshock, and never played the second one. But from what I've seen, infinite actually looks really good, so put me down under definitely.
Yeah, it's refreshing to see a company actually trying to make something new out of the series rather than giving us what they have already showed is twice before.scnj said:I don't see any reason not to. I'm glad it's tonally different. As much as I enjoyed the two previous excursions to Rapture (three, counting the masterful Minerva's Den), I think having a third game set there would only serve to take away from the previous games' stories.
This is what I thought. I thought it so fervently that I didn't even buy part 2. Part 1 was a neat, tidy story that ended as it should and I saw no reason to return to rapture. Doing so, in my eyes, would have cheapened the experience I already had there.SonOfMethuselah said:Bioshock 2 suffered greatly because it tried to follow up Bioshock directly, despite the fact that the first game neither needed, nor really left any opening for a sequel. This, in my opinion, would have been the case even if it had been Irrational that had worked on it.