Poll: Windows 8

Recommended Videos

Jordi

New member
Jun 6, 2009
812
0
0
devotedsniper said:
It's amazing how many people hate it because of what certain people have said to the public (e.g. notch) or the old so called trend of every 2nd release is good.

...snip...

The only reason it seems like Windows 8 is hated is because of the loud mouthed crowd (but that's the same with anything, the loudest are always heard)
This is such utter bullshit. Just because people are disagreeing with you doesn't mean their opinions aren't genuine. It has nothing to do with aping Notch. People are complaining about the same basic problems because these are actual real problems that people are having! You have a different opinion? Great! Good for you. You can even pretend like yours is more valid or educated or whatever. Go right ahead! But don't for a moment assume that these people's problems and observations are any less real than yours.

And it seems to me that the Windows lovers are just as loud mouthed. They're just in the minority.

devotedsniper said:
Cowabungaa said:
devotedsniper said:
The only reason it seems like Windows 8 is hated is because of the loud mouthed crowd (but that's the same with anything, the loudest are always heard)
Not really. It might be a performance upgrade but with an OS that's, especially for the vast majority of users, an almost negligible thing. What matters more is usability and in that regard Windows 8 is an utter failure. This review words the usability issues pretty well, though it probably exaggerates certain things:

Have you actually used Windows 8? I watched that video and couldn't help but think what the hell is this guy on about? I swear he's on crack.
His delivery could use some work and it's ridiculous that someone with his "expertise" couldn't figure out how to close the weather application, but I agree with 99% of the points he is making. I guess we have similar backgrounds in usability theory or something, and it's absolutely true that Microsoft completely screwed up on these issues.

devotedsniper said:
The only thing I've agreed on is the full screen app annoyance but I don't even use the app store so that doesn't even bother me. 8 does not do things automatically, I haven't experienced anything randomly popping up.
I have. In fact, it was the exact same thing. You won't run into this if you use an actual mouse and not a touchpad, but if you do and your mouse movement starts too close to the edge, it's considered a swipe and it will bring up an App if one is open. If you're not expecting this (and why would you? Windows doesn't indicate it in any way) you go through a bit of a discovery process to find out what has happened. I don't really think it's plausible to expect this to only take 10 minutes. It might be possible if you don't have anything better to do and tried to get back to your task ASAP, but still you run into the problem that you don't really know what caused it, so it's kind of hard to reproduce in the beginning.

As an aside, I find it totally unbelievable that this guy didn't know how to get out of the Weather app. I also didn't find closing Apps very intuitive, because there are no menus, right-click doesn't work and there's no X in the top right corner, but an OS "expert" should know to press Alt+Tab, Alt+F4, Windows-Key, Ctrl+Alt+Del or Ctrl+Shift+Esc. However, I don't think this completely invalidates his point here, because the vast majority of people is not actually going to know these things.

devotedsniper said:
And as for "I couldn't find the control panel" and other continuity complaints, if he spent more than 10mins not running around like an idiot he could have found several easy ways to do things, for example;

My first screenshot (2 spliced together) show ways on how to get to control panel, you can use a tradition method (left) or you can use there new menu bar by hovering on the top right side of the screen and then clicking settings on it (right);
[http://s285.photobucket.com/user/DevotedSniper/media/metro_zps39c17c0d.png.html]
I think the issue you're referring to here has to do with conveyance, not continuity (although there is also a continuity problem with the settings). The point is not that there are no ways to open the control panel. The point is that there is no obvious way. I guarantee you that most people will not have known about the little arrow next to the path in Explorer's address bar. Perhaps you've always extensively used it, so it comes natural to you, but this won't be the case for most people. For me it wasn't that hard to find either because it's also still in the left sidebar's navigation tree (below the fold in your screenshot), but again, I doubt most people knew that. There are many other ways of accessing the control panel, but I bet most people used the shortcut on the start menu or on the desktop, and those are gone.

devotedsniper said:
And just another thing, he says there isn't an easy way to close apps, again 10+ mins and he would have found something such as going over the left side of the screen and hovering;
[http://s285.photobucket.com/user/DevotedSniper/media/Metro2_zps46ddb581.png.html]

These new menu's aren't even slow, you go over to the side and maybe less than a second the menu pops up there not hard to miss, they even pop up briefly if you mouse over even for a second. All you have to do once its up is right click and it gives you the option to close them
First of all, having to spend 10+ minutes on figuring something out is the very definition of bad user interface design. And how exactly do you expect people to figure this out? If you say "check the internet", that's basically admitting defeat from a UI perspective. It seems that the only alternative is to just randomly move the mouse around until this menu will pop up out of nowhere. Some people may just go into a crazed panic and do just that (fun fact: if I try to frantically move the mouse around, I don't actually hit the corners), while some may be more inclined to take a good look at the screen and try to analytically figure out what the best course of action is (which will lead them nowhere because the menu is fucking invisible).

But let's say you randomly stumbled upon this one corner pixel and you now have the menu. Is it really obvious that you have to right-click the application and you will get a desktop-style context menu to close it? No, it's not. It's another guess you're going to have to take.

To be honest, I think that may be Windows 8's biggest problem: they broke people's intuitions by changing a lot, made much of this stuff hidden/invisible and then proceeded to not give a good introduction. I actually think most people might have been fine with a lot of the changes if there had just been a better tutorial. The interface would still be pretty bad in 4C theory, but I think there'd have been a lot less hate, because it's true you generally only have to figure these things out once. The problem is that for a lot of people, that will take a really long time or even never happen and they just want to get shit done.

devotedsniper said:
, but unless you have a good 50+ apps open they don't slow a computer down (unless seriously underpowered) but lets be honest who would have so many open at the same time (consider how many different programs you run a day, bet its less than 50).
Computational resources aren't the only issue. I'm going to guess that only about 10 applications fit into that side-bar on my HD screen. Also, when I press Alt+Tab, I don't want that overview to be clogged up by 10 apps I'm not using. At some point, switching between them may become more of an issue. And I think you hit that point long before 50 apps are open. Your question "lets be honest who would have so many open at the same time" is actually quite funny, because the answer is "someone who uses Windows 8", because they discourage closing apps. Maybe you don't use many in one day, but what if you use hibernate and rarely restart? Then it's multiple days...

This is also yet another instance where people are used to something (closing applications they don't use) that has changed. Not all change is bad, but sometimes some explanation would be nice. In this case it's also exacerbated by the fact that the apps are full-screen. If they had been Windows without Close buttons, I think most people would just click on the application they do want and continue working without worrying too much. But as it is, it can seem like the only way to escape the current application is "logically" to close it.

devotedsniper said:
In the end he spent 30 minutes before he was screaming he couldn't take no more, 30 minutes is not enough to get completely used to an operating system (a new style of one), I'm also not sure it's just me but he comes off as really biased, he didn't go in with an open mind. I don't know maybe it's because I'm a computing professional but so far I've found the thing extremely easy to use, it works well and while he makes a couple of good points, I completely disagree with most of the things he said. My main annoyance which would annoy him (something he doesn't mention) is the fact the power button is in the settings... not sure what they were thinking there but still once you know where it is it's just as quick to go there as it is in xp/7.
I'm not sure he was biased. I think he may sound that way because he obviously made up his mind before he made the video, but it's hard to say about his attitude before actually trying out the OS. What I can tell you is that I went in with an open mind and that my experience was very similar. I was fucking excited about trying out the new Windows. And when I didn't initially like it, I didn't immediately install a third-party start menu and exclusively used desktop mode, because I figured it might take some time to get used to this and I wanted to learn the "way of the future" basically. I figured that there was probably some rhyme and reason to these UI changes. Now I think it was solely to integrate the mobile and desktop OS development lines and the UI was sacrificed.

I will grant you that the 30 minutes thing is extremely bad. I will also say that I don't really believe him. The video is almost longer than that and I do get the feeling that his experiences require more than 30 minutes to accrue. Furthermore, it's kind of difficult to believe that someone who explicitly mentions the importance of trying an OS out for a month would be such a collossal idiot to give up after only 30 minutes. I don't really understand why he even mentioned this, because it just about completely undermines his credibility. Perhaps he thought this was a good place for hyperbole (or it's actually true)... If it helps, I'm a software developer who shared his experiences over the course of days/weeks and none of my software developer coworkers like Windows 8 either. We're all pretty much used to it now, but you can get used to anything.

I'm only mentioning this because you also brought up that you were a computer professional and I don't want people to think that Windows 8 is universally liked by computer people. Furthermore, I don't think our experiences are the most relevant because we are very far from being average Windows-users. And I really get the vibe that most of the Windows 8 lovers just don't get that, because you've already gone far beyond what the average user is able or willing to do if your arguments are based around fixing the UI with third-party software, reverting everything back to resemble the Windows 7 UI, spending 10 minutes to find out how to do something that used to be super simple and even effectively searching the internet. Everything used that used to be easy, now takes effort to relearn and the average user finds that frustrating because they don't give a shit about your new-fangled UI technology and just want to get work done.

Grandma is going to open the mail app and get stuck when she wants to do something else. When she somehow opens a Word document (say, from an attachment), it will start in "Desktop-mode" and she won't be able to go back to her e-mail, because there is no icon in the task bar. When she finally figures out she needs to press the Windows button to get to the start screen (because the start button is gone), she's going to forget what she wanted to do because it's fullscreen so the context in which she thought of her goal is no longer visible to aid her memory. Etc. Even if she's going to figure it out eventually, it will be frustrating and she might give up before that.

devotedsniper said:
I am in no way a fan boy of 8, but I don't think bashing a OS for trying something new is right. If you spend an hour maybe two getting used to it you would find it actually works well, metro works well with a desktop, instead of swiping you just use the mouse wheel, it works well. Hell you don't even have to use Metro for the majority of use, once you open a regular program (none app) your back on the desktop.
Do you honestly believe that it will take the average user only two hours to get used to Windows 8? So then why are this many people still complaining? Do you think most of them haven't actually used Windows 8 for more than two hours and are just making up stories? Then you are just as bad as the person I quoted above.

The reality is that Microsoft was extremely ambitious and changed the interface a lot with Windows 8. These changes mess with the intuitions people have accrued over the years. Furthermore, Microsoft violated textbook usability theory in almost every conceivable way. Most notably, their changes aren't easily discoverable, because the corner functionality and keyboard commands are invisible. And yes, it will take time to learn to use this.

I disagree that the Metro interface works well with desktop. I'm not sure if you mean on computers that aren't tablets, or with the desktop-environment, but I disagree in both cases. For non-tablets, fullscreen apps are terrible especially if you have a HD screen (which you admitted). The fact that all menus are always at the side or corner of the screen (instead of conveniently near your mouse with a right click) is a violation of another staple of usability theory: Fitts' law (which basically says you shouldn't need to move the mouse too far). This is especially bad with a touchpad. I dislike the fact that there's no constantly visible taskbar and that you can't multitask in Metro.

As for the interaction between the desktop and Metro part of the OS, that's just an abomination. It really seems they just stapled together the two OSes and basically called it a day. The taskbar in desktop mode doesn't show Metro apps. The sidebar in Metro mode doesn't show desktop apps. For all intents and purposes, they are two different worlds (although Alt+Tab mixes it up and does show both). As a user I shouldn't need to remember if something is an app or a program. I just want to have a bunch of software open to do the things I need to do and easily switch between that. I can't drag files from an explorer window to an app or copy-paste most things. There is almost zero integration.

devotedsniper said:
I also put 8 on my sisters 6 year old laptop (which is slow, single core, 1gb ram, need i go on?) and it runs great, what's more surprising is that after a 2 days of light use my sister (who cannot use a computer for anything other than web browsing to save her life) was using 8 as if it was XP/Vista/7, so it is user friendly even for those who aren't computer experts. One final thing there is still a start button, granted it takes you to metro but again if it really bothers you you can fix that.
If you say your sister can only browse the web and she can now do that as well in Win8 as in other Windows versions, you realize it really just means she can click one button to open the browser, right? I don't really find that a huge testimony to the usability of the OS. But even if she can do more: people are different in how they deal with having to learn new stuff and some of the frustration that comes with it. People have different attituted towards computers to begin with. Some really just want to accomplish the task at hand and don't appreciate a new OS delaying that. Small children learn faster and may not yet have the bagage/intuition of years of earlier Windows. Even if your sister could learn to expertly use Windows 8 in an hour, the fact that these topics exist should tell you that clearly this isn't the average experience.

Damn that got long...

TL;DR: Windows 8's UI is a horrible mess.
 

Fluffythepoo

New member
Sep 29, 2011
445
0
0
Hmm maybe this is actually a good spot to ask, wanting to upgrade my desktop to win 8 b4 i upgrade it, i wanna get the win8 pro student offer, but cant because im canadien (i got in on the 70 for an upgrade for anyone b4 feb offer on 2/3 of my comps). So i am a student at a uvi but edu accounts are only for us students.

Any american students mind lending me their .edu account? :eek:
 

The Artificially Prolonged

Random Semi-Frequent Poster
Jul 15, 2008
2,755
0
0
I don't like it very much from what I've used. The new metro thing is very unintuitive to use to me even when I kind of got used to it that doing anything feels like more work than it should. I have no problem to adjusting to new desktop layouts, I used Linux also for years now and I could have a different desktop environment every day of the week and still be able to use the computer effectively, however metro feels like a giant step back when I have to google how to find the shut down button. Granted it does get more flack than it deserves because people don't like change very much, Unity and Gnome 3 got similar reactions when they where released, however they did prove useful in the end unlike how I feel metro will.

The biggest thing for me is I find the apps useless on a desktop when generally opening a web browser to use the apps functions is quicker and runs better, eg. netflix. The snapping of apps along side your desktop sounds good until you find most don't scale well and you can't have the app and desktop take up an even amount of screen space, just one in large focus and one squished into the side, defeating the purpose of such a feature in the first place.

Aside from that I quite happy sticking to Win7/Linux and given that the performance of Win 8 is only slightly better than 7, plus the fact Win 8's secure boot thing doesn't like to play nice with Linux installs I see no reason to use it myself.

Souplex said:
I haven't liked a Microsoft OS since Bill stopped running the place. (Screw you 7!)
I hate Apple, and I'm afraid to use Linux for fear of messing something up irreparably, so I guess I'm stuck waiting for the Google OS to come out and reach mainstream saturation.
Do not fear the Linux. Behold the mighty GNU. Embrace it. Become one with the it. And you will see a garden without walls or windows. A garden of clay to mold as you see fit. :p

Or try a burning a live cd to try a linux os without making any changes to your system. Also check out the Escapist's Linux Group for all your Linux talk and help /shameless plug.
 

CrimsonBlaze

New member
Aug 29, 2011
2,252
0
0
I just have two gripes with Window 8.

The first is the following:
Windows, get your damn tablet OS out of my damn desktop and laptop computers.

Sure it might seem like a blast if you have a touch screen interface device (or nothing that resembles a sensible computer), but for all of us who just want a competent OS for our "giant machines" that are questionably portable, we like to have something that works, we're familiar with, and that we can jump right in without having a tutorial chained to our ankle.

The second is that this just wreaks of laziness. Yes, I get that Windows feels it needs to create a new OS every few years, despite people being happy with what they are currently using, but what happened here? They just ported the tablet OS and repackaged it as the new desktop and laptop OS. It's like the PSP interface being ported into the PS3; yeah, it functional, but it just seems silly and a bit unimaginative.

All I ask is that Windows 8 takes a lesson from Apple and allow us to have two modes to work with (i.e. regular Apple desktop and a PC desktop). The first mode will be the standard Windows 7 desktop for sensible PC users and the second can be the Windows 8 OS for douchy, pretentious "Look at me! I have the latest of something so that means I'm popular and relevant!" consumers.
 

Tufty94

New member
Jul 31, 2011
175
0
0
CrimsonBlaze said:
All I ask is that Windows 8 takes a lesson from Apple and allow us to have two modes to work with (i.e. regular Apple desktop and a PC desktop). The first mode will be the standard Windows 7 desktop for sensible PC users and the second can be the Windows 8 OS for douchy, pretentious "Look at me! I have the latest of something so that means I'm popular and relevant!" consumers.
You can do that though
 

McKitten

New member
Apr 20, 2013
74
0
0
Boris Goodenough said:
MorganL4 is acutally right, to some extent.
Vista during its developtment phase was called Longhorn, which was ended prematurely (due to having spent too much time developing it) and you ended up with Vista and Win 7 is Longhorn in its full glory.
I'm not saying he's wrong, just pointing out that on release, Vista was a horrible mess on the order of ME. ;) And the difference between release Vista and patched Vista is just about as large as that between Vista and 7.