Poll: Woman guts horse, takes pictures in it's carcass

Recommended Videos

Jedisolo75

New member
Aug 12, 2009
194
0
0
The title actually says it all. Take a look at this article

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45142278/ns/us_news-weird_news/#.TrP-KUOa9tM

What do you think, should this be a crime?

Edit:
I just want to make clear, I never said it should be a crime, I just saw the article and had to post it.
 
Dec 14, 2009
15,526
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil said:
Why should it be a crime?

Animal abuse is already a crime.
Ding ding!

We have a winner!

This kind of thread is very similiar to the Chinese toddler one.

I haven for outraged individuals to be outraged about something or other...
 

Rofl-Mayo

New member
Mar 11, 2010
643
0
0
They killed it humanely before doing that so they didn't break any laws. I'll be honest and say that the idea of it disgusts me and isn't right but there was any law infringement and so I voted no.
 

Tyrant T100

New member
Aug 19, 2009
202
0
0
The girl from the pictures is quite attractive, they shot a crippled horse they owned, no problem here.
 

Tanakh

New member
Jul 8, 2011
1,512
0
0
They killed the animal as painlessly as possible.

If anything she and the bf looks like sad bored sobs looking for a cheap thrill, but a crime? No way.
 

JochemDude

New member
Nov 23, 2010
1,242
0
0
Well morally it's pretty sick, but they didn't hurt anyone doing it.
A 32 year old horse wouldn't be going on for much longer anyway.

Still, sick people.
 

dorkette1990

New member
Mar 1, 2010
369
0
0
Rofl-Mayo said:
They killed it humanely before doing that so they didn't break any laws. I'll be honest and say that the idea of it disgusts me and isn't right but there was any law infringement and so I voted no.
Exactly this.
Killing an animal isn't considered cruelty. In most states, if you shoot someone's pet, the worst they can do is demand repayment for the worth of the animal. Animals are considered property in that regard. Unless the animal is tortured, it's not considered cruelty or neglect. Although her actions were morally questionable, she did not break the law.
 

iLikeHippos

New member
Jan 19, 2010
1,837
0
0
Well...
*puffs on cigar*

Bitches be crazy.
Do mind, dicks be crazy, too. Just not in this story.

OT; There'll probably be a weird-ass law popping up in a year or so saying "You may not purchase a horse, gut it, strip naked and climb into it." in Oregon, US.
 

Sam Warrior

New member
Feb 13, 2010
169
0
0
Animal abuse is illegal but putting down an animal which you own humanely is fine, what you do with the corpse afterwards is up to you. I think the woman is seriously weird but isn't doing anything illegal.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
Jedisolo75 said:
What do you think, should this be a crime?
Linking back to your article: First comment

The Oregon Authorities are NUTS! YOu don't need LAWS for this type of behavior, you need STRAIGHT Jackets! This woman is loony-than loony and only a Mafia RAN instutition would say it's all right because I don't have a lAW THAT SAYS IT ISNT!!! Crazy Government! WOW - No wonder children are being STOLEN from their homes - in Oregon - one out of 25 familes, will have the LIVES invaded by Oregon DHSH , for the more children they take, the more money they get. Oregon, once was kind of cool, kind of hip - now it is JUST N.U.T.S!!!! along with this woman who did NOTHING WRONG. SATAN Himself KNOWS this is WRONG....but not the government...not without a freekin' law to tell them!!! Heads up their arses!

This is why you need police to police the police - because NO ONE CAN THINK ANYMORE and certainly - there is no sense anymore when you have DEVIANT Leaders!
This should be a crime.
 

Colour Scientist

Troll the Respawn, Jeremy!
Jul 15, 2009
4,722
0
0
I like how she attributes her want to do it to her love of Star Wars. As far as reasons go it's pretty surreal.
As disgusting as I find her getting in the horse is, it was old and was scheduled to be put down anyway. All I can think of in the eyes of the law is desecration of a body but that doesn't seem to extend to animals.

Although there is nothing legally wrong and the horse didn't suffer it's still pretty fucked up.
 

Slash Dementia

New member
Apr 6, 2009
2,692
0
0
It's very disgusting, but...I don't see laws being broken, so no.

They killed a horse that they took care of for years. The horse was old and they did it painlessly. I don't agree with taking pictures inside of it, but it's not up to me. I say no.
 

Cowabungaa

New member
Feb 10, 2008
10,806
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil said:
Why should it be a crime?

Animal abuse is already a crime.
Apparently the horse was simply slaughtered for consumption, at least that's what I read. Then they started playing around with the carcass.

So yeah, not a case of animal abuse. Doesn't make it any less twisted of course. A shame because she looks darn cute. Seeing her wrapped in horse intestines and blood does make her quite a bit less attractive.
 

Iron Lightning

Lightweight Extreme
Oct 19, 2009
1,237
0
0
I don't see why it should be illegal. It's not like they killed the horse particularly painfully and who care what happens to a lifeless corpse?

Some people have so much empathy for the dead, it's weird.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
Today I have seen Emmett Till's bloated, mutilated face after he was murdered, and now I've just seen a naked woman posing with - and inside of - that.

I think its best if I just go and watch the Care Bears for the remainder of the afternoon.
 

Aurora Firestorm

New member
May 1, 2008
692
0
0
Say it with me, anyone here who eats meat in any way: "Killing an animal is not abuse."

Torturing an animal is abuse. Killing it is not. We humanely kill animals all the time. I killed a squirrel with a shot to the heart. Boom, one hit, and it fell dead right there. Little to no pain, almost certainly. Do I think that's abuse? No. But if I go all Peter Wiggin on a live squirrel and chop up its skin and pin it to the ground to die, that's abuse.

Also, if you kill a horse with little pain and suffering, you can do whatever you want with its body, and it doesn't care. It's *dead*, no matter what you think of its sentience while it's alive. It certainly can't feel you doing anything to it now!

And if people are offended by someone taking a picture in its corpse, well, think about what you're doing every time you wear a leather jacket. You're taking a piece of what was once a *living cow* and wrapping it around your *body.* It's kind of the same thing, if you think about it.

So if we outlaw wrapping yourself in horse flesh and taking pictures, well, you're leading to the edge of a really slippery slope. And besides, if it's your thing, I'm not going to stop you, so long as you're not offing my horses without my permission.

This post is trolling for a number of people: people who went vegan/vegetarian because OMG the animals, people who defend cute/friendly animals to the death, and people who will be instinctively squicked out by the nature of the photo. (I went there, yes, but as a die-hard meat-eater, I tend to spurn the "but don't kill the animals" mentality.)
 

JoJo

and the Amazing Technicolour Dream Goat 🐐
Moderator
Legacy
Mar 31, 2010
7,170
143
68
Country
🇬🇧
Gender
♂
What she did wasn't normal certainly, but should it be illegal? Since she wasn't harming anyone I see no reason for that.