That's basically the thing I wanted to say. I'd get her head examined.Colour-Scientist said:Although there is nothing legally wrong and the horse didn't suffer it's still pretty fucked up.
I was with it at the beginning. This isn't illegal or even really immoral, but if you consider the intent and the execution, there is some kind of either raging, dangerous stupidity or just straight psychosis involved. ***** be nuts.The_root_of_all_evil said:Crazy person snip
Animal corpse desecration however, is not.The_root_of_all_evil said:Why should it be a crime?
Animal abuse is already a crime.
At 32, although old can still be of use. I treat a 42 year old ex racer. She's is retired but still full of beans.JochemDude said:Well morally it's pretty sick, but they didn't hurt anyone doing it.
A 32 year old horse wouldn't be going on for much longer anyway.
Still, sick people.
Yeah. Taking a dead horse, boiling its skin and other connective tissues, then sweetening it and feeding it to your children, that's weird. Neither should be illegal though. Seriously? Who came up with the idea for Jello?Vrach said:Animal corpse desecration however, is not.
exactly. they owned it, it was sick, they put it down. then she got nekkid in it. that's a little weird...Tyrant T100 said:The girl from the pictures is quite attractive, they shot a crippled horse they owned, no problem here.
Probably because the girl already covered that one herself...Sober Thal said:No Empire joke yet? Huh...
From the Seattle Weekly Blog said:The reason for climbing inside the animal was later explained to deputies as Lottin's desire to "be one with the animal."
That and her love of Star Wars.
From the police report:
Lottin said in the movie Star Wars the character Han Solo cut open and animal with his light saber and placed Luke Skywalker inside the animal. This was due to Luke freezing to death in cold weather. Lottin said there was nothing religious about what she did and didn't intend to offend anyone.