Poll: Woman guts horse, takes pictures in it's carcass

[Ragsnstitches]

What the fuck.

Honestly, I am not shocked by this... I have come to terms with the fucked up things people do. These people are Mad as a Hatter or incredibly stupid, or both, and have just committed social suicide in an incredibly macabre fashion.

Just 1 question though: Why did they post it on the internet, if she wanted to just experience the sensation for herself? By all means, have your sick perversions as long as you don't harm anyone, but saying that you didn't want to offend anyone AND POSTING IT ON THE WEB is fucking moronic (or simply trolling... if you can call it that).

I hope she picked up something foul inside that horse. The horse deserves some karmic justice.

 

[Blue Hero]

My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic. Season 4.

 

[DarkPanda XIII]

All I can really do is rub my head to rid it of the headache, and mutter. "Stupid Artist"

I mean, really, read the article, I've heard a great many artists say: "I always wanted to know..." and then make their work.

Should you have killed the horse? IF it really was that sick, then yes, let it not suffer anymore. Gutting it and entering it? Woo boy, that is alot of wrong. Taking pictures of it? Well, let's just say brainwaves are on the lower end of the spectrum.

 

[Mrsoupcup]

AW DUDE, fucking nasty. Read this right when I was eating too, damn my curiosity.

 

[Straitjacketeering]

Too bad it's no fap November...

 

[Robert Ewing]

Technically they haven't broken any animal abuse laws. So... as gross as it is, each to their own?

 

[Dark_Reaction]

/b/tard... That explains it alright.

A cam-whore takes the next logical step and gets inside a dead animal butt-nekkid - certainly sounds like the fodder of 4chan(the gutter of the internet)'s gutter.

Fun fact: Letting the bodily fluids of animals intermingle with your own (not hard when you're naked in a corpse or playfully nibbling a raw organ) is a great way to catch/spawn a zoonosis, so.... Yeah, if we all turn into zombies due to sexually-transmitted horse-flu, I know who I'm blaming.

 

[Laurie Barnes]

DO I agree with this? Not exactly. Do I think she broke any laws, unfortunately, no. She owned the animal, and if I wanted to gut one of my dogs, providing I did it humanely(anyone else feel a tremor in the force just now?) I wouldn't break any laws either. If you are gonna arrest this lady for this, you might as well arrest Gaga for her meat suit.

 

[Unesh52]

Pics or it didn't happen.

.>

I don't think it should be a crime. If it's ok to kill animals (humanely), then it doesn't matter what you do with them after they're dead. So the question is whether it's whether it's ok to kill animals on a whim or not.

 

[Saulkar]

***** be fucked up! But nothing illegal was done. The animal was killed painlessly before nut heads decided to go all Hannibal on its ass. Besides, how is this any different from me wearing my leather?

 

[DarkPanda XIII]

/b/tard... That explains it alright.

A cam-whore takes the next logical step and gets inside a dead animal butt-nekkid - certainly sounds like the fodder of 4chan(the gutter of the internet)'s gutter.

Fun fact: Letting the bodily fluids of animals intermingle with your own (not hard when you're naked in a corpse or playing nibbling a raw organ) is a great way to catch/spawn a zoonosis, so.... Yeah, if we all turn into zombies due to sexually-transmitted horse-flu, I know who I'm blaming.

Disgusting, but noted.

 

[CrazyGirl17]

I wanna ask this lady, "What the fuck is wrong with you?!"

I mean, yeah, she might have killed the horse humanely... but there are just some things you shouldn't do with a corpse, animal or otherwise!

 

[FenrirsWilly]

Should those 2 be strongly recommended to seek some kind of professional psychological help, yes, but so long as the horse was old and soon to die and humanly put down, not a crime.

 

[BrionJames]

Say it with me, anyone here who eats meat in any way: "Killing an animal is not abuse."

Torturing an animal is abuse. Killing it is not. We humanely kill animals all the time. I killed a squirrel with a shot to the heart. Boom, one hit, and it fell dead right there. Little to no pain, almost certainly. Do I think that's abuse? No. But if I go all Peter Wiggin on a live squirrel and chop up its skin and pin it to the ground to die, that's abuse.

Also, if you kill a horse with little pain and suffering, you can do whatever you want with its body, and it doesn't care. It's *dead*, no matter what you think of its sentience while it's alive. It certainly can't feel you doing anything to it now!

And if people are offended by someone taking a picture in its corpse, well, think about what you're doing every time you wear a leather jacket. You're taking a piece of what was once a *living cow* and wrapping it around your *body.* It's kind of the same thing, if you think about it.

So if we outlaw wrapping yourself in horse flesh and taking pictures, well, you're leading to the edge of a really slippery slope. And besides, if it's your thing, I'm not going to stop you, so long as you're not offing my horses without my permission.

This post is trolling for a number of people: people who went vegan/vegetarian because OMG the animals, people who defend cute/friendly animals to the death, and people who will be instinctively squicked out by the nature of the photo. (I went there, yes, but as a die-hard meat-eater, I tend to spurn the "but don't kill the animals" mentality.)

I'd have to agree with you. It's fucking weird and pretty grotesque, but as long as they're not torturing the animal...well there isn't a whole lot to be done except maybe shun them socially.

 

[drosalion]

I find it revolting personally, but definitely dont think it should be a crime.

 

[alandavidson]

Yes, it's sick. Yes, these people are messed up and in need of mental help.

But they didn't commit a crime.

Unfortunately.

 

[DementedSheep]

Illegal how? Should there be a law against climbing inside a dead animal?
What she did was odd to say the least but she owned the animal and so long as she put it down properly and didn't torture it?s not abuse. This comes under "wtf is wrong with them" not "they should be charged"

 

[SidingWithTheEnemy]

I wonder by which delusional mindset some commenters are driven that they judge this to be immoral or impure. What kind of presumptous character some of them have, to tell someone else what you should or shouldn't do with a dead animal. You don't need to like it, you don't need to support it but just mind your buisness...
As long as mankind exists there have been different fetishes. There are people who like Scatplay or into Pokemon porn. There are even deviants who worship eye cancer provoking pony child cartoons. As long as they don't shove it into my face they can pretty much do what they want with their spare time. Considering how slaughterhouses work and how cruel we are to animals at this day and age this example is one of the harmless things that someone can think of.

 

[Virmire]

I'm more concerned about the killing then the bizare photo shoot. They said the horse was sick, if it was suffering, and couldn't be cared for, then it is arguably fine for them to kill it. If it wasn't, and they only wanted it dead to do the photos, then it's cruel.

Also, the article says that they planned to eat the meat, if they did or planned to do so as they shot the horse, it is no different then any other livestock that is commonly eaten. What they did afterwards was just odd and disgusting, not overally morally wrong.

They said that they planned to eat the meat, and that the horse was sick. So from the only evidence about this, it is not illegal, or morally wrong. Just really, really, weird. If they lied, then it was wrong, but we don't know either way.