Poll: World War Three.

Recommended Videos

TornadoADV

Cobra King
Apr 10, 2009
207
0
0
Jedi-Hunter4 said:
TornadoADV said:
So the US would win, NATO is just there to slow down the Soviets.
You do know the US is in NATO right?
I was talking of a direct comparison between US and the USSR, excluding both NATO and WARSAW.
 

LtWigglesworth

New member
Jan 4, 2012
121
0
0
TornadoADV said:
The surest way to lose a battle is to underestimate your enemy.
Says the man who thinks that committing B-52s to a high intensity European conflict is a sensible decision.
 

TornadoADV

Cobra King
Apr 10, 2009
207
0
0
LtWigglesworth said:
TornadoADV said:
The surest way to lose a battle is to underestimate your enemy.
Says the man who thinks that committing B-52s to a high intensity European conflict is a sensible decision.
The B-52 showed itself capable of handling extremely dangerous bombing missions straight into the teeth of hostile ADEZs in Vietnam. The NVA completely expended their SA-2 stockpiles for extremely underwhelming results against Stratofortressess. In a 1980's conflict, with EF-111As and F-4Gs protecting them even further, the Soviets would stand almost no chance of knocking down bombers from the ground.
 

Stuntcrab

New member
Apr 2, 2010
557
0
0
BurnedOutMyEyes said:
Yuri, because he is fucking OP as shit against both the allies and the soviets.
He's got a counter to literally everything they can throw at him, for cheaper, and he's got mind control on top of that.
Fuck that guy.
Holy crap someone else who actually remembers Yuri, fucking mastermind tanks.

OT: Honestly I think its a tie between NATO and Warsaw, all the other choices might be blown to hell withing five minutes, even the cockroaches, no offense.