Pretty much this, snipers are a legitimate tactical option, and removing them would remove alternatives to twitchy-finger shooting and grenade spamming (I'm exaggerating some, but FPS's would lose their strategic edge).Daystar Clarion said:No, shooters have a lot in common with RPGs in regards to play style and class choices, every weapon group has it's purpose and advantages and disadvantages. Variety is the spice of life.
And this is why this poll is pointless. You want to play a game that requires a refined amount of skill, but don't want to put any effort into getting said skill. IF that's how you want to play video games, I have a disappointing reality for you: all video games operate at that level! Heck, all games period operate at that level! So you have to make a choice:awesomeClaw said:But i don´t want to learn how to play, i want to have fun, and snipers destroy my fun.
It's not valid at all, lowest ping always gets there first in the server's eyes, lagging or not.CMDR Zero C said:It seems like a kind of valid reflex test though. If i see you and you see me at the same time, who ever gets the first shots (providing they hit), should win that little skirmish (also providing the hand of god *lag* doesn't say one person fired while the other didn't).
Haha, if anybody didn't get this you should be sniped.RedMenace said:Suuuuure.
Because running and spraying bullets is the only legitimate way of playing any FPS. Anything else is for a "f*ggoty a$$ cheating n00b b*tches".
[/sarcasm]
I'm impressed theres not a lot of people around doing math jokes.RedMenace said:Than I have only 2 thing to say to you:awesomeClaw said:Because running and spraying bullets is the only legitimate way of playing any FPS. Anything else is a "f*ggoty a$$ n00b cheating".
That is acually how i see it.
1) Quote button. Use it. Love it.
2) Learn to play. Snipers are good, but they have their weaknesses. Locate a sniper and use cover strategically to get close. Than gun him down. Its as easy as 3.14159.
fix-the-spade said:It's not valid at all, lowest ping always gets there first in the server's eyes, lagging or not.CMDR Zero C said:It seems like a kind of valid reflex test though. If i see you and you see me at the same time, who ever gets the first shots (providing they hit), should win that little skirmish (also providing the hand of god *lag* doesn't say one person fired while the other didn't).
Worse for console players, host always wins in the event of two twitch shooters meeting face to face. You need ways of getting the drop on opponents or the guy with the most expensive broadband is at an advantage from the start.
True, however thats not how I like to play. In a straight reflex test, more often than not I will loose to the guy who plays more often and has spent years training his reflexes. I prefur to stay unseen and strike from a hidden location without the other player ever seeing me.CMDR Zero C said:Flames66 said:No. Without snipers to pick them off everyone would just run around like lemmings on speed. I hate how most online FPS games are turned into reflex tests of who can shoot first by the players.
It seems like a kind of valid reflex test though. If i see you and you see me at the same time, who ever gets the first shots (providing they hit), should win that little skirmish (also providing the hand of god *lag* doesn't say one person fired while the other didn't).