Poll: Would you buy a console without ability to sell used games?

Recommended Videos

Saika Renegade

New member
Nov 18, 2009
298
0
0
No. Several times over, no.

I like the option to purchase secondhand games precisely because it allows me to occasionally come across gems long after the original publisher's stock has had its run of the shelves. I own a physical copy of God Hand only by the virtue of the secondhand market, along with several other games I only learned about long after the fact. Unless they keep intending to make small unit production runs on demand for gamers like me who stumble onto good games by accident long after the fact, such a model won't have my business.
 

ksn0va

New member
Jun 9, 2008
464
0
0
Myndnix said:
I probably wouldn't buy a console that couldn't play used or rented games. I don't buy (or rent) them often, but it's a principle thing.
And if every console up and decided to do this, I'd just switch over to PC gaming full time.
That's kinda funny don't you think?
 

Kaymish

The Morally Bankrupt Weasel
Sep 10, 2008
1,256
0
0
i would not buy a console anyway i am a member of the glorious master race however i did have a PS2 fond memories of which led me to buying a PS3 which now sits on the shelf in the living room playing DVD's and the occasional blu-ray movie so i don't think i will make the same mistake of buying a console again and blocking used games would be a definite deal breaker for me even though 8 out of 10 games i own for console are brand new
 

Auron

New member
Mar 28, 2009
531
0
0
Nick Mason said:
Draech said:
Batou667 said:
I'd bloody well think twice about supporting a company that had that level of undisguised contempt for their customers.
Like Valve and all their bloody contempt for their customers. Not allowing me to resell my games.
Steam Market now allows you to auction or sell your games.
Are you drunk? No, you can sell gift copies and that's it. And they've always been tradable as long as you didn't activate them.

Anyway, I get the "let's boycott them because they're toiling our freedom" point, I totally do except the general public will not care one bit and it will be pointless. Then again, what the hell's different about console gamers? Most Steam users I know would rather get more games and increase their libraries, replayability, extra options, multiplayer and what-not.



I would like to get rid of Chivalry though, those are my worst 4 dollars ever spent on something, the game's completely terrible and the people who acclaimed it and convinced me it was good(aka the general public.) are all obviously on massive quantities of drugs.
 

Alexi089

New member
Jun 26, 2011
96
0
0
Not a chance.

I'd be asking to get screwed over if I shelled out £200-300 (maybe more for this generation) to buy a console and basically trusted my media supplier to 'fairly' set the price of the games I play on it. They bumped up the price of games by ~ 1/3 of their original price between the PS1 to PS2 generations (£30 went up to £40). Given complete control over the price of games, I really wouldn't be surprised if many publishers tried for £50- £60/ copy. Afterall, in this scenario, your only option as the cosumer is to not buy games; in which case you've just bought yourself a very expensive bluray player. The game industry's contempt for their customers is quickly catching up with football clubs and night clubs, so I think it's good to give these companies a metaphorical slap once in a while and remind them that they sell entertainment to customers, and we are the ones who are meant to be pleased.

Anywhoo, I think this claim of damage to the industry from used games is grossly overplayed. Devs/ Pubs speak as if these used games just materialise and swoop in to steal all their profits. They don't. Someone has to buy the game new, and if they don't care for it all that much; or simply bore of, they sell it, usually for far less than they pay for it. A memorable game with decent replay value will not have a large used market because people who own it will want to keep it rather than regret selling it at a loss later. You see this on amazon all the time: Popular games hold their price, and the difference between the used price and new is rarely that great (who wants peanuts for a game they really like, after all). The one and 2 star games are the ones that go for a few £. Them and games that are several years old, and if I can wait 3 years for a game, chances are I would never have bought it full price. Hence, I suggest that the companies suffering huge losses from a flood of used copies entering the market a month or 2 after release start looking at the customer feedback on their games in case it's because hardly anyone really liked it. Just seeing this at the bottom of my window: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/122056-Game-Dev-Claims-Demos-Hurt-Game-Sales makes me think that the problem is indeed developers refusing to acknowledge that they've made some poor products. How can a game that most bore of after the demo be good?

I'm wondering if it's worth us gamers dropping a couple of lines of email to dev's customer service when we hear of a new game we would buy if it weren't for the associated DRM/ other nuisances they want us to accomodate after paying for our game. Maybe I'm too hopeful but a few thousand emails with 'I'm not buying X because DRM annoys me' in the subject line may get them to re-think their attitude.
 

spartandude

New member
Nov 24, 2009
2,721
0
0
Yes but only if game prices are lower... much lower

see the reason i dont mind no used games with the PC is because new releases are (usualy) cheaper and we can also get new copies of other games really cheap as well

heck i picked up Fallout new vegas, both bioshocks and the entire jedi knight series for £25, i cant do that on consoles

most of my console games are used because i simply cant afford to buy them new, sure they go down in price eventually but that seems to be happening slower with smaller price drops, at least in my area.

so with new used sales i wouldnt be able to afford them
 

Batou667

New member
Oct 5, 2011
2,238
0
0
Draech said:
You just parrot the old "I want cheaper games and that will make the industry better". No. It will just get you more games.
Bit rude. Fine, we'll agree to disagree.
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,310
0
0
Draech said:
Snotnarok said:
A lot of people are mistakenly saying "well steam does it and everyone is okay with that"
The reason being that many are fine with Steam doing is because the games are on sale so often at ranges from 25%-75% off so you wind up buying games at 2.50-10 bucks a pop vs 60 bucks. When do you see console games go on that kind of sale?
Right now with playsation+
Till your sub runs out then your game list is instantly gone, it's not the same. And I don't exactly feel comfortable with a service that can pull the rug from under your feet, potentially removing games whenever they want
 

Maevine

New member
Feb 4, 2013
59
0
0
There has been but one time in my life I've purchased a *new* game, and that was the Wii Fit Plus, which I got with my birthday money because my family gave me a Wii for Christmas that year. Everything else in my collection was either bought used, traded, or handed down to me. So, would I buy a console that didn't play the only games I ever get? ._. No.
 

Macgyvercas

Spice & Wolf Restored!
Feb 19, 2009
6,103
0
0
I've thrown my hat in with the master race, but for what it's worth, if it can't play used games, I wouldn't buy it.
 

an annoyed writer

Exalted Lady of The Meep :3
Jun 21, 2012
1,409
0
0
I wouldn't buy a console that couldn't play used games for one reason: what about those games that went out of print five years ago that you can't find new anymore, even if you tried? I didn't get The Darkness when it first came out, since I didn't have a next-gen console back then, so I bought it last year at a local used game shop for $6. That $6 led to a $60 purchase of the new game. If I can't do that, then what's the point of buying the new consoles? I don't like being screwed over, so I only buy new after educating myself about the game. If I can't educate myself by seeing the past of the game in question, then I can't build an understanding of the game that I'm considering buying.
 

Quadocky

New member
Aug 30, 2012
383
0
0
All glory to PC gaming.

And honestly, Consoles are pretty much the worst choice for gaming unless you want some of that sweet sweet Nintendo juice.

Though I would buy a console that had no ability to play used games if the games sold were 20 dollars or less each.
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,310
0
0
Draech said:
Snotnarok said:
Draech said:
Snotnarok said:
A lot of people are mistakenly saying "well steam does it and everyone is okay with that"
The reason being that many are fine with Steam doing is because the games are on sale so often at ranges from 25%-75% off so you wind up buying games at 2.50-10 bucks a pop vs 60 bucks. When do you see console games go on that kind of sale?
Right now with playsation+
Till your sub runs out then your game list is instantly gone, it's not the same. And I don't exactly feel comfortable with a service that can pull the rug from under your feet, potentially removing games whenever they want
Technically Steam can do the same thing. Pull your account away. But yeah it isn't steam lvl yet but it is pretty damm close.

The thing is also that PS+ doesn't have the new release thing going for it like Steam have. My personal theory is that if there were a service on the consoles that was as identical to what steam steam is (within what is technically possible) then the physical market would die out the same way it has for PC.
But it's different still, PSN+ you don't actually own the game, you have it because your subbed to them. Steam has removed games however if you purchased the game you still 100% own it. EA removed Crysis 2 and if you had bought it you still had full access to downloading it/playing it. They cannot remove the game from your ownership because you licensed it.


s69-5 said:
Snotnarok said:
No, never because the games would stay expensive as console titles typically do.

A lot of people are mistakenly saying "well steam does it and everyone is okay with that"
The reason being that many are fine with Steam doing is because the games are on sale so often at ranges from 25%-75% off so you wind up buying games at 2.50-10 bucks a pop vs 60 bucks. When do you see console games go on that kind of sale?
I've purchased plenty of games on PSN (not plus) on sale for 90% off. That's right it cost me $1 to buy nearly every Pixeljunk game (regular $10). $1 to buy Dungeon Hunter Alliance (usually $12 I believe). There are weekly deals (not PSN+) of both 30% and 50% (or more) off the price.

Also, with Steam, you're already living in the era of no used game sales, so IMO, Valve and Steam can fuck off. I can't figure out why people praise that service so much. It's a fucking rip off and people just seem to bend over for it, take it up the ass and like it - then try to denounce Sony and Microsoft as evil for MAYBE doing the same thing in the future. It's fucking weird.
What are you talking about with Steam/Origin? I hate to be so blunt but you've NEVER been able to sell your PC games. This is not new, I've had consoles & PC games for ages and PC games you bought in 1997 were worthless in any store. They require a serial number and often have a registering option so the game would always be worthless, if a shop DID buy from you, your game would be valued at 1 dollar & you'd be breaking some EULA where the person could lose access to the game. Steam & Origin have only made games easier to share your games, give my friends across the country my user & password and they can play my library easily. It's not defending, it's just the first thing PC gamers have had a chance at REAL sales and the sales are unbelivable, you're talking about titles 5-10 bucks on the PSN right? I got 60 dollar games for 10 bucks. Game gets removed from the steam/origin network? You still have full access to downloading the game you bought. I'm not defending the service, I don't hold loyalty to some dumb company I'm just saying don't get your mind twisted up that there was some magical land you could sell your PC games to, it's never been something you can do.

What the new consoles would bring in is a $60 physical game that you cannot sell, would potentially be locked to the SYSTEM not your email address. Because after all, want to play a game at your friends house but it's locked to your console? Well just unplug that ethernet cable and you probably could. Think that sounds weird? Look at the WiiU, the piece of shit that it is locks games to the device and NOT your email or such, so if your system goes belly up, you get a big "Sorry but look at the EULA, that's what you agreed to."

The problem with this is, what I said you can get 60 dollar titles often on insane sales & often if they're multiplayer you can buy a pack of 4 for the price of 3 even if they're on sale. Torchlight 2 on sale for 10 bucks? The four pack would be listed for 30 instead of 60, meaning 1 is free the rest are on sale. Can't sell them? Never could sell your pc games in the first place.
 

JoesshittyOs

New member
Aug 10, 2011
1,965
0
0
Depends. If Microsoft/Sony had downloadable offers for every game that's going to get released, and if they actually started having sales on said downloadable games with actual cheap prices, I'd consider it.

But we all know that's not gonna happen. They love their money too much. So no, I wouldn't buy it.

Right about now, I'm just holding out for the Steam box. I've liked what I've heard so far, and I've already got a sizable build up of Steam games that don't work on my current computer.
 

JEBWrench

New member
Apr 23, 2009
2,572
0
0
s69-5 said:
Also, with Steam, you're already living in the era of no used game sales, so IMO, Valve and Steam can fuck off. I can't figure out why people praise that service so much. It's a fucking rip off and people just seem to bend over for it, take it up the ass and like it - then try to denounce Sony and Microsoft as evil for MAYBE doing the same thing in the future. It's fucking weird.
Well, for liking Steam? Personally it's because I don't have a decent retail option, and the quality of titles on Steam is better than on Desura.