Poll: Would you embrace a shift to purely digital distribution of games?

Recommended Videos

aaronobst

Needs a life
Aug 20, 2010
245
0
0
You may be surprised by the amount of people who game without internet, therefore without a way of aquiring DD games

Physical FTW
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
FUCK NO

half the reaosn I got a conolse was so I could buy the game..put it in..and play

I dont want to spend hours upon hours downloading crap
 

PureChaos

New member
Aug 16, 2008
4,990
0
0
i mainly game on my Wii and i like having disks. though i'd get used to having to download all the games, i'd prefer to have the disks
 

Blade_125

New member
Sep 1, 2011
224
0
0
I think the only game I have bought a hard copy of for my PC in the past two years was starcraft 2, and that was because I coulnd't buy it online. It is so much nicer and easier to download games, plus I no longer have to store the physical media. I don't even have to worry about backing things up since I can download copies of my games form Steam or impulse if I get a new computer. I think this will be the way of the future.

I woulnd't get your hopes up about the price going down though. Disks and shipping costs are a very small percentage of the cost of a game. Plus in economics, everything is worth what the buyer is willing to pay.
 

getoffmycloud

New member
Jun 13, 2011
440
0
0
No way I love having my physical copies and it would become too much of a monopoly for a handful of digital distribution services to sell all games as at the moment I can go to video games stores supermarkets computer shops and various other places to pick up my games and it keeps competition in check. I will admit DD is good for smaller companies to get there games to the masses in ways they couldn't before and without it things like amnesia would never have been as successful but there should always be an alternative
 

Pandabearparade

New member
Mar 23, 2011
962
0
0
No chance.

Not just because I buy used games, though I do, but because I like having a tangible collection. Digital experiences are great, but I just enjoy seeing a huge stack of games on my shelf as proof of my addic- hobby.
 

teqrevisited

New member
Mar 17, 2010
2,343
0
0
No. For a start, my connection is mediocre at best. It seems with the two main ISPs available I have to choose between speed and line quality. Secondly, I do like to have a physical collection. I can start them up any time I like, make backups that will run no problem at all. With services like Steam, as much as I use it, that's another barrier between not playing a game and playing a game.

Regardless of my personal opinion, if the industry is going to go digital it's going to have to wait for the internet services to catch up first.
 

Doom-Slayer

Ooooh...I has custom title.
Jul 18, 2009
630
0
0
Fishyash said:
Okay, then it must be a problem on my end.

I have had a couple of periods where I had no internet connection. I had no possible way of running my steam games during those times. Whenever I clicked "start in offline mode" I got an error saying I could not run steam in offline mode. Fortunately I still had quite a few games that could be played offline.

That was what she meant by "offline mode". Obviously there was probably a way around it, but when I don't have the internet, I should be able to play these games offline.
To be fair I can udnerstand how thats annoying. But the point of the online mode is essentially one more step to stop pirated games. The thing with ofline mode is to play any game, you need to go online and play that game once so that you can play it offline. From what I understand its so Steam can basically verify your game files and cdkey to check you arent running a hacked version.

Yes I can understand its annoying, but to be fair long lasting connection problems..ie ones that mean you CANNOT get on for like a day or so, are very rare. If you have an on/off internet connection, all you would do is wait for it to connect briefly..then sign in and go into offline mode and your sorted. Actual long period connection issues are becoming less and less frequent as internet speed and knowledge increases, so I dont really see it as a total deal breaker.
 

Zac Smith

New member
Apr 25, 2010
672
0
0
Boris Goodenough said:
Zac Smith said:
100% DD? No way, I still prefer to have an actual psychical copy of something, even CDs by my fav bands, even if it's easier and cheaper to buy on Itunes, I like to collect the CDs themselves, same with games, + Used game market is a plus for someone like me who doesn't have masses of disposable income.

That's by no means saying I don't buy any games from steam though
CDs is another thing all together, the ACCs and MP3s you get from DD are pretty compressed compared to the real deal and with a good sound system you can easily hear the difference.
It was just an example because music has been digital for some time now. The point I was making was that there are some things, be it games or music that I want an actual real copy of, not just a line of text on the computer saying I own it
 

Appleshampoo

New member
Sep 27, 2010
377
0
0
I've not bought a boxed game in years. I think it's time people stopped living in the past and started to embrace the glorious digital ages.
 

galdon2004

New member
Mar 7, 2009
242
0
0
I do not agree with a total shift. While digital has it's advantages in ease of access and lower costs since they don't need to make disks and packaging, we never actually get to see these savings passed on to us. the steam download of a game is almost always the same cost as buying the hard copy. It would also cause the wide shutdown of game stores across the globe if there was no physical medium for games. As well, there's a security in owning something physical. This digital distribution thing ties your purchases to licensing connected to your account, or worse, to your computer.

Get banned; lose 600 dollars worth of games? Get a new computer, lose all those games because you aren't allowed to copy them over? Too much potential for abuse by the game companies. I feel that there should always be the choice to get a physical copy of the game.
 

Domehammer

New member
Jun 17, 2011
180
0
0
If it became digital only I would either stop gaming or become a pirate. Next gen of consoles I plan to NEVER connect to internet by any means possible. PC games I am making effort to do my best to locate a hard copy of game. I will fight against one system of purchase coming out as only one. I look forward to age where digital and physical are more in harmony with as close to 50/50 as possible. If dark future of oppression of gamer rights that comes hand in hand with digital distribution being king then I don't want to be gamer. Some might say that digital distribution isn't that bad but of course it isn't right now it still has to compete with physical purchases. Once it's all alone it will lead to control unimagined in hands of people that see consumers as walking credit cards to bleed dry. Right now digital distributors have to play nice. I don't see it as impossible that first thing that would be killed by publisher pushing digital distributors would be modding by causing any modding software on computer equal account lockout of all games purchased.
 

Beryl77

New member
Mar 26, 2010
1,599
0
0
I pretty much only use Steam for my games, when it's not Steam then I buy in retail but that happens very rarely. I just pre-ordered Mass Effect 3 on retail but not on Origin. Other than that, I don't remember the last time I bought a game retail. It's been quite a while.
 

Vivace-Vivian

New member
Apr 6, 2010
868
0
0
No. At least I know what I own with a physical copy. Servers shut down, companies go bankrupt. It all just seems sketchy to me.
 

Jinxzy

New member
Jul 2, 2008
445
0
0
There's good and bad to the digital download. I love using steam and recently I started buying books in digital download. Yet there are some digital downloads you have to be careful about. Some digital downloads give you a copy, it's your copy but if you lose it you have to buy another one at full price. Even some digital downloads say that you don't own the item. It's still there's. When you own a physical item it's yours. You don't have to go threw loops to prove it's yours.

Example: I bought a few games on my phone for fun. I loved playing them but when my screen broke on my phone I had to get another one. When they transferred the data to my old phone to my new one. All my games were gone, I told them they were missing and that I wanted them back because I payed for them. They told me they couldn't get them back and that I can't prove that I had them. So I would have to buy them all over again.
 

LilithSlave

New member
Sep 1, 2011
2,462
0
0
s69-5 said:
Luxuries. They are not necessities. Food, water, shelter. That's the priority. Or did you not yet learn Maslow's pyramid?
The internet used to be a luxury. Now it is a necessity considering how many things depend on having an internet connection and how it is bordering the usefulness of an automobile.

A good portion of jobs out there today require you to apply online. Leaving those without an internet connection very disadvantaged in terms of looking for a job. And that's just one of the many important advantages of having internet access.

Having a job is definitely not a luxury.
s69-5 said:
No. Virtual HD. There's a difference. As per the way DD is shaping up, you will not be allowed to DL the content on your personal HD. You will have to save it on servers (virtual HD) at a seperate location. Storage costs money. Since you don't own DD games, but are only licensing their use (I noticed you had no retort for that) there will come a time that all you will be able to do is access the content - not save it to your personal HD.
This is quite an extraordinary claim. Source?