gender is irrelevant in my decision, than again i would also never hit a man unless he would hit me
Have fun dying if a woman takes advantage of that and knifes you in the neck!Lagao said:Under no circumstances would I hit a woman. I was raised as a gentleman and follow a code of chivalry.
Yes, chivalry isn't dead.
I don't know hitting is not okay.magicaxis said:I believe I acted properly. Do you?
Smaller vs weaker is a rather big difference though, and drastically changes your meaning. That's like if I were to say "when I said 'blacks are inferior,' I really meant 'blacks are darker.'" World of difference.manic_depressive13 said:You completely ignored the point of my post and jumped on my loose wording (smaller rather than weaker)
Actually, the point was smaller does not mean a loss. Your accusations of condescension are amusing, but false. I suppose you are free to infer what you want (since you're doing it anyway), but just pretending to know my intent does not make it so.as an excuse to condescendingly explain that a small person with martial arts training could beat a larger person. No fucking shit.
"Can be" being a REALLY FUCKING IMPORTANT POINT HERE.However, most people don't have martial arts training and size can be a significant advantage.
It rather obviously wasn't, as you have twice made concessions to that end. As such, accusations of nitpicking are ridiculous.I could've chosen my words better but I think my post was perfectly clear.
Pot, meet kettle.So yes, I am patronising you because you are being childish and unnecessarily hostile
Not to be condescending, but you do understand how internet forums/message boards/whatever work, right? You posted something in public, someone in the public saw it and commented.something like that when I wasn't even addressing you to begin with.
Hahahahaha what? Equating smaller muscles with weakness is comparable with equating dark skin tone with inferiority? This is just getting fucking stupid. No one misunderstood my initial meaning except you. Cry some more if you must but I won't be replying again. I see no need to keep resurrecting a thread for this stupid bullshit.Zachary Amaranth said:Smaller vs weaker is a rather big difference though, and drastically changes your meaning. That's like if I were to say "when I said 'blacks are inferior,' I really meant 'blacks are darker.'" World of difference.