For the first guy: Nope. I wouldn't. But like I said, I wouldn't do anything to help him escape. And considering the situation, it looks like the police have him. He has to pay for his crimes and hopefully he understands that. The only reason why I wouldn't turn either of them in (as in go to the police and tell them I have them) is because of their apparent change and guilt (but like I said, only if I feel it's genuine). I'm not forgiving these people, I'm just understanding that they seem to regret what they've done and because of that, I'll stay neutral when it comes to action.ravensheart18 said:Let's try changing this up.Irony said:Because of his apparently guilt over what he did and his kindness over the years, I wouldn't turn him over to the police.
A catholic priest had sex with little girls and boys (say infant to 8 years old) at a church orphanage from the time he was a priest in training at 18 until he was 30. He was introduced to it by his bishop and all the priests at the orphanage did it. They said god wanted them to have sex with the kids. At 30 he was transferred somewhere else where there was no access to kids and he started feeling guilty. He spent the rest of his being a truly perfect/giving person who did nothing wrong and was what everyone would consider an ideal human being.
When he is 80 one of the victims comes forward, the rush starts, he confesses that he did it but was a changed man, haunted by his past.
Do we forgive him for raping those hundreds of little kiddies?
Now lets talk about the one priest in the orphanage that didn't touch a child, but knew what was going on and did nothing to stop it, and even helped cover it up. Do we forgive him after his 50 years of feeling bad?
Yeah whenever i here american, russian or any soldier speak those words after having committed atrocities i become disgusted.HG131 said:They couldn't do anything about it. They were fools, and have changed. One exception. If the words or phrase "I was just following orders." come out of their mouth, I'm turning them in. To quote The 9th Doctor: "And with that sentence, you just lost the right to even talk to me."
No I suppose not, but you know what does absolve him? The fact that 99.5% of the people on this forum would commit atrocities in order to survive. It's human nature, everything we do is to stay alive and reproduce. (well stuff like suicide isn't but you get the point)ravensheart18 said:And the fact that other war criminals exist doesn't absolve this guy.slowpoke999 said:I personally believe what the Russians and Japanese did in the war and after was much worse then what the Nazis did,the Russian troops raped and killed a shit-ton of post war civilians and the Japanese committed so many war crimes it'd make the worst video game enemies blush.
I'm not sure if this has been brought up or not but if you feel like that you should read up on Zimbardo's prison experiment and also Milgram's famous electrocution experiment. I think you'll find them interesting.HG131 said:One exception. If the words or phrase "I was just following orders." come out of their mouth, I'm turning them in. To quote The 9th Doctor: "And with that sentence, you just lost the right to even talk to me."
Crimes of obedience are still crimes. Sure he didn't want to commit genocide, but he still did. If he really didn't want to do it, he could have run like so many other people escaping the Nazis. He could even have fought, and tried to save as many as he could. But no, he put his own safety over those of so many other people. He's nothing but a coward. And he'd have to pay the price.Drake_Dercon said:snip