chuckman1 said:Don't you know they're part of the gay agenda and the globalist zionist islamist lizard jewish banker conspiracy that got obama the socialist electedlax4life said:No, doing something that sounds like it would require some amount of effort. Also Alex Jones told me that trans people have super cooties, and nobody wants super cooties.Ah Alex Jones what an interesting figure for the people to put their trust in to. BUY MY WATER FILTER THE GOVT WATER IS COMMIE MIND CONTROL.
Idk I just think trans people are sexy, it's like genitals that can seem disgusting on a guy are somehow cute to me on them, and the post op ones can be pretty great to. Hopefully one day I can be part of the jewish islamic gay lizard consspiracy of bankers and try something with a trans girl![]()
Hmmm, I kind of fall into that category given Klinefelter's. But if you are talking Klinefelter's (XXY) specifically, you're still talking males in most biological contexts. But in situations of specifically XXY, etc, it's not technically intersex for the great majority. Your average, run of the mill human has 44 autosomes (regardless of male or female), and a pair of sex chromosomes. 22 pairings of autosomes, 1 pairing of XX or XY. In Klinefelter's where you have increased number(s) of X chromosomes.Kilyle said:I think I could marry an intersex man. I don't believe that God meant for the entire group of intersex people to be celibate, nor indeed to marry only other intersex people, so it makes sense that they should be acceptable in normal marriages and I shouldn't have a problem with it. Intellectually, I think it shouldn't be any weirder than marrying a guy with any other genetic abnormality or deformity... though I don't know how I'd feel about it if I actually were in that situation, and sometimes our feelings don't match our rational understanding of things (you can be disgusted by something that you reasonably shouldn't find disgusting). And in my understanding, intersex covers not only visibly weird stuff between the legs, but also just having a genetic setup that doesn't clearly indicate either male or female (XXY, XXXY, etc.).
It doesn't matter if you suspect or not, you're still running a risk, because your average woman is not going to be particularly happy to have someone ask her whether she was born a man or not, even if it comes with a caveat like "I'm asking because you're really tall", or "I'm asking because your leg spacing seems different than most women", or "I'm asking because you have broad shoulders". What you're basically saying is "you have masculine characteristics", and most folks of either gender don't like being asked why they have stereotypical characteristics of the other gender.KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:Well I was speaking specifically in the case if someone has suspicions, so thanks for taking a small part of my post out of context. As things go there are ways to tell if someone is trans. The leg spacing on biological men is different from biological women. So that could be used to spur the question in that case.Ihateregistering1 said:Ok, gonna strongly disagree with you on this one. Seriously, tell any guy to go up to the next woman he meets and ask her whether she was born male or female, and let me know how it turns out for them.KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:...if you have suspicions it's perfectly okay to ask if someone is trans, or not.
I think the context would be "under any circumstances." So presuming that you found a trans person attractive, would you date them or would you not due to the fact that they are trans, though I think I can figure out your answer from what you've already said!BloatedGuppy said:Where's the "it depends" answer?
Because it would depend on whether or not I was attracted to them.