What so the government will be able to see what the heck were doing at every moment? SICK! I mean I'm going to go and take a piss and I gotta worry about government shitheads watching me? No! Hell No!
You know what they say about assumptions?AgentNein said:Yeah, I think it's safe to say that you have no idea what you're talking about.jthm said:I do, we just call it a democracy.
No idea what you're talking about - that song was coolKukul said:To those morons, who voted "yes". Watch this video and imagine it's your father at 1.09
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_exZCp40x9w&feature=related (you probably won't like the song so you can mute it)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7949785.stmBBC World
A few days ago, a report by the official North Korean news agency KCNA declared that the US was the worst human rights violator in the world - and said that US workers were deprived of the elementary right to food and clothing.
If by "those people were rioting to begin with" you mean that the Solidarity movement was posting workers' strikes to induce economic reform, and the State Council responded by unconstitutionally declaring martial law for over a year, during which opposing viewpoints were completely removed from the media, then yes. We can certainly see who was really at fault when Solidarity won with a landslide against the Communist Party in 1989, when free elections were allowed again.Ozu08865 said:Those people were rioting to begin with so who really is at fault the government or the people?
With all due respect, I work with what you give me. But I do appreciate the well thought out response.jthm said:You know what they say about assumptions?AgentNein said:Yeah, I think it's safe to say that you have no idea what you're talking about.jthm said:I do, we just call it a democracy.
Fact is, the U.S. is more of a police state than most would like to admit. We have two candidates chosen for us to act as figureheads of govt. Why only 2? Surely there are more ideas and idealogies than can be boiled down to Democrat or Republican.
Our Press is ranked 53rd most free by an independent Swiss media watch group. Why? Because it is influenced, controlled and owned by wealthy members of our society who have ties to govt. and a personal stake in which news stories are aired and how much time they are given. As such our decisions are made based on erroneous information provided to us by people in power.
Certainly we are free to work or not to work. For most of us that means we are free to work or free to starve and lose shelter. What we actually have in this country is an elaborate system of wage slavery, allowing us to buy our own chains. Think that isn't a police state? Try missing a few payments or refusing to pay your taxes. You'll meet up with the police eventually in that conflict between citizen and state.
Our decisions are made for us as to what we eat and drink or otherwise consume, based on what is made available in our area, what is commercialized and what is legal. Further what is legal isn't decided on a basis of what is healthy or good for us, it's decided by wealthy special interests with an interest in selling certain things and not allowing competition. Do you know why marijuana isn't legal in this country? Because back in the 1800s rope manufacturers petitioned the government to make the Hemp plant illegal because Hemp rope (higher quality rope I might add) was putting them out of business. Cigarettes are still legal despite having no positive benefits and many negative ones. And lest you think I'm some crazy, pot smoking conspiracy theorist, I don't use pot or any other illegal substance. I just see bullshit for what it is.
Our communications are routinely monitored by the government, both through wiretapping and digital means. Not everyone clearly, but quite a number of dissenting opinions. This is done under the guise of crime fighting or protecting us from remote or vague "terrorist threats".
Read the patriot act if you disagree.
Our civil liberties are curtailed by a sense of morality that is expressly forbidden by the very constitution we are supposed to uphold. Disagree? See Prop 8.
I realize you were only giving a flippant response to a flippant comment that you disagreed with, but try not to assume the level of education or awareness of another person based on one sentence, m'kay?