Poll: Would you rather live in a world with vampires and no nukes, or nukes and no vampires?

Recommended Videos

un533n

New member
Nov 24, 2008
116
0
0
All the fag teenagers don't know what a vampire is outside of Twilight. You need to specify whether we're talking about Dracula, or Edward Cullen. We're already living in this world with nukes (right..?) and it's pretty boring as of right now, so I'm all for living in a giant castle and playing the piano in my spare time. Sign me up for the Vampire Squad.
 

bluepilot

New member
Jul 10, 2009
1,150
0
0
I`d rather have Vampires.

At least Vampires have rules and can be disposed of. Radiation cannot be reasoned with

Vampires also cost less tax money.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
Isn't the question redundant? We're already living with nukes and no vampires, and we're all doing just fine. If there were vampires they'd be forced to suck ze blood, so it would be worse for us.
 

Sewblon

New member
Nov 5, 2008
3,107
0
0
Nukes and no vampires. When nukes hit people, they usually just die. When vampires bite people, they become the eternal lackeys of a more powerful vampire.
 

Snowalker

New member
Nov 8, 2008
1,937
0
0
Erana said:
Snowalker said:
I'm an irriated werewolf... you bastard.
A rather fluffy and puffy one, if your avatar is to be believed. Can I use you as a pillow?

Also, I'd rather Vampires.
In the old sense. I've always wanted to jam a brick in someone's mouth...

I suppose..
 

AvsJoe

Elite Member
May 28, 2009
9,055
0
41
Edjustneedstomakeitregistermealready said:
Motti said:
Edjustneedstomakeitregistermealready said:
So it's "Twilight" or Today.

Today, please
What he said.
haha god help me if i ever see a vampire "sparkle"
Whatever happened to vampires? They used to be evil and scary. They would kill you and drain your blood, turning you into one of them for all of eternity or just flat out killing you. Sure Dracula was just looking for love, but he was slaughtering a bunch of innocents along the way.

Now vampires are not to be feared or hunted down, but loved and hugged? What happened? I blame Anne Rice.
 

bushwhacker2k

New member
Jan 27, 2009
1,587
0
0
I've never had much interesting in gigantic bombs that destroy everything and leave massive amounts of radiation... then again STALKER is a good game and that is the result of massive amounts of radiation but I'm getting off-topic... I think vampires are cool.
 

Chibz

New member
Sep 12, 2008
2,158
0
0
Vampires and no nukes. They'd say something against twilight and get ripped apart by the rabid, scary fan base.

Problem solved.
 

AvsJoe

Elite Member
May 28, 2009
9,055
0
41
Zeeky_Santos said:
AvsJoe said:
Edjustneedstomakeitregistermealready said:
Motti said:
Edjustneedstomakeitregistermealready said:
So it's "Twilight" or Today.
What he said.
haha god help me if i ever see a vampire "sparkle"
Whatever happened to vampires? They used to be evil and scary. They would kill you and drain your blood, turning you into one of them for all of eternity or just flat out killing you. Sure Dracula was just looking for love, but he was slaughtering a bunch of innocents along the way.

Now vampires are not to be feared or hunted down, but loved and hugged? What happened? I blame Anne Rice.
Yeah I know right, What the hell kind of love story involves a vampire that "sparkles"? kind like the gayest vampire ever. Bring on the blood of the innocents Love story now!
And not just Twilight. These new House of Blood novels (or whatever) are further destroying the image of vampires, as well as movies like Modern Vampires (at least that one's got some killing, but it's still a love story).
 

Buschmaki

New member
Apr 16, 2009
110
0
0
Vampires cause then i could host a realistic theater version of true blood where people really die. Yes dance my puppets and say Sookie strangely muahahahaha. and you forgot to add lycanthorpes weresharks werebears werewolves and werebunnies to get eateen by weresnakes who are eaten by werehumans.
 

Deacon Cole

New member
Jan 10, 2009
1,365
0
0
Country
USA
MiserableOldGit said:
I've got a theory that the reason the horror genre doesnt really scare like it used to is because real life boogy men make made up monsters look like a right bullshit operation- with vampires, at least you have a chance to leg it while they suck on someone else, or stab em with a bit of old stick or something. What do you do about a nuke, other than turn into a lightbulb and leave a silouhette on the nearest wall?
Not really. The problem is that the vampire has been bastardized. Since, at least 1897 when Dracula was first published, the vampire was an allegory for sex. Most can tell you about the trepidation they felt about their first sexual encounter, unless they lie. But this has been abandoned in favor of a D&D player's irrational obsession with irrelevant details. 30 Days of Night using UV lights being a good example.

It's sad to think that for all its awfulness, Twilight at least keeps the sexual element of the vampire in place while other productions fail to keep this core element. A vampire is a sexual predator. We can relate to this because we all feel a bit like predator and prey when seeking sexual partners.

But the vampire has been overused and misused to the point where it would be difficult to make it work anymore. I think it has more to do with this than any new horror replacing old horror.

But there is something to your theory. new horrors crop up as the zeitgeist changes (hey guys! fancy word!) The 50's saw an influx of atomic horror films. Mostly giant things, like Godzilla, as an allegory for the threat of nuclear war.

But fear of global destruction gets boring after a while, so as the 60's gave way to the 70's, a new genre of environmental horror came about. These movies often had an environmental message of some kind. Often the killer whatsit was created by pollution but sometimes it was just nature itself striking back or running amok. Most of these movies were, of course, terrible with the most recent being M. Night Shyamalan's The Happening.

So what concerns people and would make for good, timely horror can change over time. These days, fast-spreading diseases might be scarier than mythological bogey men. But it all still boils down to a matter of taste.
 

Superbeast

Bound up the dead triumphantly!
Jan 7, 2009
669
0
0
Nukes - it's highly unlikely they'll be used ("dirty bombs" might be done by terrorists, but the area of effect is smaller - I assume we're talking ICBM-launched warheards when you say "nukes"). Vampires can grab you anywhere at night (especially if they're the 30 Days of Night vampires that kill instead of turn, and generally just ruin your day).

Neonbob said:
quiet_samurai said:
Odd poll. I picked vampires though, you can't reason with a nuke.
Have you ever tried?
Surprisingly, if you know the language, they can be swayed easily enough.
This is reason that humanity should never, ever develop full "artificial intelligence".

Can you imagine the counselling self-aware nuclear missiles would need?