Poll: Would you time-travel and kill Hitler?

Recommended Videos

New York Patrick

New member
Jul 29, 2009
462
0
0
mattttherman3 said:
BarbaricGoose said:
mattttherman3 said:
BarbaricGoose said:
It's good to see that the Aryan Brotherhood has such a strong presence on The Escapist.

Or you know, something like them.
You don't know what effect killing hitler would have on the present my fellow escapian. And not wanting to commit murder makes me part of the Aryan Brotherhood? Thats some nice logic.
Yeah. I was being COMPLETELY serious when I said that. COMPLETELY not joking at all. I definitely wasn't being sarcastic at all. COMPLETELY meant what I said. Again, not trying to be funny. You're totally a racist, and I'm not joking. That was not sarcasm at all.

I'm very glad that you understood how not-sarcastic I was being. My joke definitely didn't go over your head.
I have to say, unless you use caps like you just did, there is no way to know if your being sarcastic or not. . .
There is. I believe it is called 'rational logic.' No one on the Escapist is serious about ridiculous claims, unless they are bashing Fox News...
 

Dwarfman

New member
Oct 11, 2009
918
0
0
I read somewhere that the Allied generals decided against assassinating Hitler, due to the fact that Hitler's appalling tactics and military decisions started to aid the Allies in future offensives.

So, no.
 

BarbaricGoose

New member
May 25, 2010
796
0
0
mattttherman3 said:
BarbaricGoose said:
mattttherman3 said:
BarbaricGoose said:
It's good to see that the Aryan Brotherhood has such a strong presence on The Escapist.

Or you know, something like them.
You don't know what effect killing hitler would have on the present my fellow escapian. And not wanting to commit murder makes me part of the Aryan Brotherhood? Thats some nice logic.
Yeah. I was being COMPLETELY serious when I said that. COMPLETELY not joking at all. I definitely wasn't being sarcastic at all. COMPLETELY meant what I said. Again, not trying to be funny. You're totally a racist, and I'm not joking. That was not sarcasm at all.

I'm very glad that you understood how not-sarcastic I was being. My joke definitely didn't go over your head.
I have to say, unless you use caps like you just did, there is no way to know if your being sarcastic or not. . .
If someone comes off as completely and overtly moronic, maybe consider that it's sarcasm.

Me suggesting that everyone who voted "No" is a racist didn't strike you as... I don't know... maybe not entirely serious?
 

Admiral Stukov

I spill my drink!
Jul 1, 2009
6,943
0
0
New York Patrick said:
Stukov961 said:
No, Red Alert showed what happened when Einstein removed Hitler.
Stalin would conquer Europe!
But then the Americans would win it back!
But then Yuri would take over the world using the Russians as a proxy!
But then the Americans would go back in time to fight Yuri!
But the Russians would steal their time machine and go back and fight Yuri!
But then they would try to fix everything and accidentally make Japan a major superpower!
But it was all a metaplot by Kane to make sure that Nod would not be defeated in the Tiberian Wars by using the amount of paradoxes to sheild the worlds from the Tiberium Meteor Shower event, instead developing the cleaner, safer Chrono-Chrystaline powersorce!
Yeah it would be pretty chaotic.
Love your name, Patrick is a good name BTW, though I spell mine without the c.
 

Keepitclean

New member
Sep 16, 2009
1,564
0
0
No, the world learned a lot from that war and following events.
Pips said:
I wouldn't do it. Believe it or not, Hitler was not the worst person who could have assumed power. Under his leadership, the Nazis were terribly disorganised, and spent a great deal of their energy on in-fighting. If Hitler was dead/had never been born, the power vacuum would be filled by someone else, and they would possibly be even worse than he was. (A level history FTW!)
Also this.
 

bulbasaur765

New member
May 1, 2010
505
0
0
No. Some things would have never taken off without it, such as the Civil Rights Movement- As well as all the medical information/discoveries that were taken from the Nazi's experiments on the Jews (sad, but true)
 

Littlee300

New member
Oct 26, 2009
1,742
0
0
Pips said:
I wouldn't do it. Believe it or not, Hitler was not the worst person who could have assumed power. Under his leadership, the Nazis were terribly disorganised, and spent a great deal of their energy on in-fighting. If Hitler was dead/had never been born, the power vacuum would be filled by someone else, and they would possibly be even worse than he was. (A level history FTW!)
Disorganized? There formations gave Poland and France no chance at all. If anything the USSR were disorganized. "We will bury them in our dead."
 

Littlee300

New member
Oct 26, 2009
1,742
0
0
Plurralbles said:
No. A communist germany would also be terrible.

The US had a bunch of commies show up in the Great depress and it could have turned the nation into a communist state all the same. Heck, the war actually did destroy America's soul a little, for examplee Japanese internment... Of course, the nation never really had a soul, with slavery lasting, I think, a thirty years or more years longer than Europe and requiring a war to get rid of it.
Fixed
 

susvox

New member
Dec 22, 2010
8
0
0
No i wouldnt go back because if we erase events from the past we lose what we learned from them
 

Double A

New member
Jul 29, 2009
2,270
0
0
No, but I would time travel to kill Hitler and Karl Marx. That's like, a bear and an eagle with two stones. Which is still pretty decent.
 

Blatherscythe

New member
Oct 14, 2009
2,217
0
0
emeraldrafael said:
Blatherscythe said:
Ah Russia, an excellent point to prove Hitler's shit strategy and preparation. Hitler wanted to press into Russia when it would soon be winter. His generals told him it was too late to enter Russia and to wait for next year, he ignored them. He sent in his troops with summer attire believing it would make them want to work harder to get home to avoid Russian winter. He made the biggest fucking mistake in the entire fucking war, Napoleon made the same god-damn mistake he did and to make matters worse he dragged Russia into was against him.
Cant Deny that. Hitler got too greedy, but really, when is it ever a good time to invade Russia? Besides, no one was touting him as a Military genius. Just a really passionate speech. But the fact remains, if Russia wasnt involved, Germany could have held out. Russia wanted nothing to do with America or the British, and Japan just needed to not screw with the border of China/Russia, since Hitler pretty much begged them not to draw in America.

Blatherscythe said:
That was the problem with the fucking Axis forces, they took on too many foes at one time, Russia was piss scared of Hitler and wanted to avoid contact and America had no love for Britan and only got involved when Japan bombed pearl harbour.
Actually, America covertly supported the British and allies in both World Wars, cause that was a major ally and trading partner. They sent everything just short of soldiers (including guns and munitions) to help the British and in larger scope, the Allies. And FDR was pretty much begging for an excuse to get in there and break America's foreign policies, but he couldnt just come out and say it and risk his re-election.

Blatherscythe said:
Hitler sucked massive balls when it came to foresight with his plans, want another example? He stormed into a room and shot a pistol shot into the roof and declared his party was taking over the German Government, he claimed he had the support of the police (a fucking lie) as well as his own party, the Prime Minister was there and he decided to pretend to bow to Hitlers will and as soon as the police showed up had him and the party leader arrested for treason.
Well, Hitler won that war in the end, now didnt he? Look, say what you will about the guy, but he was GENIUS politician. In fact, if you studied him and his book Mein Kampf, you could have a rather successful and aspiring career in politics. Besides, the Prime Minister must have liked something in him, since he put him pretty high on the totem pole of politics under him. If you stopped that, you probably would have never had WW2. Its like Japan, Germany was under so much debt/international control/sanctioned that it either had to go to war and risk its economy going through a collapse. Say what you will, but Hitler saved Germany.

... He just fucked it up again before he was done.
Yeah, I'll admit that he was a good politition (oxymoron there) and gave one hell of a speech. He could work a crowd and I bet if I can take out the rambling bullshit about Jews, communists and his perfect race crap then I would probably get some insight in how to be a decent public speaker. Also, fun fact, Hitler decided when the war was going sour for Germany that they burn everything in Germany because, in his mind, the German people had failed him, not the other way around. Good politition (just doesn't fucking feel right to say that without a no in front of it), racist asswipe and Austrias number one crazy, arrogent bastard.
 

Blatherscythe

New member
Oct 14, 2009
2,217
0
0
BarbaricGoose said:
It's good to see that the Aryan Brotherhood has such a strong presence on The Escapist.

Or you know, something like them.
Dude, my family is from Germany and I have blonde hair and blue eyes and even I, someone who wouldn't be so terribly screwed by Hitlers Regime, think Hitler can rot in hell for the fucked up atrocities he commited and allowed to be commited. Granted what you saying is sarcasm but still, fuck Chris, everybody hates Hitler.
 

Callate

New member
Dec 5, 2008
5,118
0
0
It's tempting. That's a lot of innocent lives lost, directly relatable to one man. But it's a very real question whether killing Hitler would have made things better. If World War II had progressed anyway, under the leadership of someone who was a more competent military leader and less of a wild-eyed, all-over-the-place fanatic, we might be looking at a very different Europe today. Or if Germany had put off the war for five years and as a result developed atomic weaponry before the United States. Or if the powderkeg of post-WWI resentment had exploded in some completely different way.

No, I don't think I'd kill Hitler if I had to snap back in time to see the results of my ill-considered actions. But if I could stay in that time period and get away clean to see and perhaps influence the results, I might consider it.
 

mattttherman3

New member
Dec 16, 2008
3,105
0
0
BarbaricGoose said:
mattttherman3 said:
BarbaricGoose said:
mattttherman3 said:
BarbaricGoose said:
It's good to see that the Aryan Brotherhood has such a strong presence on The Escapist.

Or you know, something like them.
You don't know what effect killing hitler would have on the present my fellow escapian. And not wanting to commit murder makes me part of the Aryan Brotherhood? Thats some nice logic.
Yeah. I was being COMPLETELY serious when I said that. COMPLETELY not joking at all. I definitely wasn't being sarcastic at all. COMPLETELY meant what I said. Again, not trying to be funny. You're totally a racist, and I'm not joking. That was not sarcasm at all.

I'm very glad that you understood how not-sarcastic I was being. My joke definitely didn't go over your head.
I have to say, unless you use caps like you just did, there is no way to know if your being sarcastic or not. . .
If someone comes off as completely and overtly moronic, maybe consider that it's sarcasm.

Me suggesting that everyone who voted "No" is a racist didn't strike you as... I don't know... maybe not entirely serious?
Man, you never know these days, I've met some pretty crazy people in my time, I have met a few on here as well. Sorry I guess
 

Trivun

Stabat mater dolorosa
Dec 13, 2008
9,831
0
0
No. Because of two reasons. One, the effect on the timeline would be completely unpredictable and killing him may actually do more harm than good. Two, it creates a paradox, because if I go back and kill Hitler then I exist in a timeline where Hitler is dead, so I have no reason to go back and kill him, so I don't do so, so Hitler survives, so I go back and kill him... you see the pattern here?

Messing around with time is bad, m'kay?
 

Irony's Acolyte

Back from the Depths
Mar 9, 2010
3,636
0
0
I don't mess with timelines as a general principle. You never know what will happen when you do, and something as important as that will affect the future tremendously. I would kill someone similar in the present before the whole thing got started, but I don't want to mess with the past. And if it "already happened" (as in no matter how hard I try, my actions in the past will cause the same thing) then there is no point in trying.