Different design teams, apparently in entirely different buildings. We'll have our Diablo 3 eventually.pantsoffdanceoff said:Oh no, new content? Sure a new game would be fun but don't forget Diablo 3.
Let me summarize the story in as few sentances as i can:Gxas said:If you find WoW's story hard to follow, learn to pay attention. It is very simple to follow. The story progresses as you level. And no, a WoW 2 would never be a good idea and Blizz knows this.Sev said:Do you think that Blizz is going to far with World of Warcraft by adding yet another expansion? Instead of making it a new game entirely. By now, the story of the world is so convoluted, it's practically impossible to follow. With every new expansion comes a whole new set of story archs and changes to previous expansion quests up to the point where Outlands is an actual and current threat to the world whilst at the same time, people are pissing there pants for another current threat that's actually taking place years in the future (Lich King) And now they're expecting new players to follow? I mean, those of us that have been there for years can probably follow easily. But new players are totally screwed.
Should Cataclysm just go beyond being an expansion and become World of Warcraft 2? Or are you satisfied with it cluttering up the game even further?
Take the time to read quest text, its not hard to follow in the slightest.
Terrible idea. I vote no.
Yes. WoW has a great story. Several quest storylines are epic, well worth time and effort spent on them.Woodsey said:Why would they spend years getting the game to this stage, and with the players spending years getting their characters to whatever stage, only to make a new game?
And has anyone ever played an MMO for the "story"?
they are making gnomeregan a city. problem solved.ma55ter_fett said:I hope WOW2 is in a steampunk future setting.
actually thats one of the maing points of why i was hesitant to actually start playing WOW, the lore is so extended and convoluted i thougth "damn, i`m never going to get the game"Sev said:Do you think that Blizz is going to far with World of Warcraft by adding yet another expansion? Instead of making it a new game entirely. By now, the story of the world is so convoluted, it's practically impossible to follow. With every new expansion comes a whole new set of story archs and changes to previous expansion quests up to the point where Outlands is an actual and current threat to the world whilst at the same time, people are pissing there pants for another current threat that's actually taking place years in the future (Lich King) And now they're expecting new players to follow? I mean, those of us that have been there for years can probably follow easily. But new players are totally screwed.
Should Cataclysm just go beyond being an expansion and become World of Warcraft 2? Or are you satisfied with it cluttering up the game even further?
Personally I would have set World of Warcraft 2 in that world's future so that there is little lore from the first game to come as well. Sort of like 200 years after the Lich King was defeaten, a new enemy rises and a whole new set of races and alliences must come and conquer it. There would still be an Allience and a Horde, but a lot of new races like the ones already coming to Cataclysm and some others. Make WoW 2 the endgame so that after the Lich King in Wow 1, there could still be less massive, but very important events.HentMas said:Boatload of text