ZippyDSMlee said:
Zephirius said:
Didn't ruin the movie for me. But then I'm one of those filthy heathens who doesn't appreciate Deadpool's comic status as I have never read a single Marvel comic in my life (How dare I?).
Not meant as an attack on you or anything. Just sayin', haven't read the comics so really wouldn't know/care.
And yet most of the comic films that sht on the comics wind up being bad films.... all but for the zombies who only watch and pal1ly for the eye candy and nothing else....
"pal1ly"? ...Your whole sentence kinda fell apart there. I have no idea what that means.
Anyhow. I thought it was a pretty good movie, the special effects weren't all that impressive. I was kinda disappointed that a cool character like Wade just up and got killed by Victor and that it is further only alluded to in a couple lines. Then he gets brought back as computer-controlled supermutant guy, I was kinda... "What."
Overall, whether they "took artistic license" or "sht on the comics", I thought it was a pretty good movie. Really, you should be glad more people are taking an interest in the franchise, even if it is through movies that bend the canon a bit. They could find all the comics and take an interest and learn how the story
initially (not truly, work of fiction people) went. Or would you rather have no movies at all and the entire franchise just stagnates where it is now? I'm sure a ton of movies are based on older works and bend the stories a bit, but most people don't mind that. I suppose it is because comics are much younger and used to be very popular with a generation that is still alive that people are so vocal about this.
But enough ranting about comics and movies inspired by them. Safe to say fancy special effects don't impress me, and I liked the movie, because it gave me a more complete image of Wolverine as portrayed by Hugh Jackman, who frankly, is pretty badass.