Poll: XBOX ONE DRM BACK!

Recommended Videos

Stevolteon

New member
Mar 6, 2012
8
0
0
HydroFire said:
I mean seriously, who even rents games these days? I know that I rented them back in 1995. But this is 2013 most people buy games ONLINE. Through steam, xbox arcade, App Store and heaps more.
But renting games is exactly what you would have got with the X Box One. Granted probably a long term rental, but a rental nonetheless. It all depends on how long Microsoft think it's worth keeping the servers open.
 

Lilani

Sometimes known as CaitieLou
May 27, 2009
6,581
0
0
HydroFire said:
Did I ever say the online check in was a good thing?
No, but you said it was a "small price to pay," which pretty much as the same effect.

Honestly, please explain to me why Microsoft HAD to nix the sharing when they nixed the online check-in thing. Because all we asked them to get rid of was the always-online bullshit, and they went and got rid of EVERYTHING. We asked them to get rid of the bad and keep the good, but they got rid of both.

If anything, you should be bombarding Microsoft with this nonsense, not us. They're the ones who took it away, not us.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
IceForce said:
Ah, I didn't realize it was hourly in that situation.
Yeah, they explicitly stated that the 24 hour was for the primary console only.
That gets me wondering, how much does Microsoft pay its shills to join forums like this and spread good PR?

I reckon I could do a better job than the shills I've seen around here.
Yeah, but look at how Microsoft handled the situation in the first place. If their EXECUTIVES can't handle PR better than that, how can anyone else?

"You're backwards! Buy a 360! Why would I want to live in 85% of America?"

Yeah, they had some real classy folk running the show.
 

OutsiderEX

New member
Jul 18, 2011
48
0
0
mad825 said:
That time of the year when 4Chan pays a visit to the Escapist?

Say what you want, all those features can be implemented without DRM. Take gog as a small example even though it doesn't have it's own client per se. You can download what you want, when you want without having to verify the game and you can download a small program to manage the downloads as well as keeping the game up-to-date

Whatever the case may be, you don't need DRM for anything other than for control and/or restriction.
What the hell? /v/'s been adamantly against the Xbone since the first details came out.
 

Saika Renegade

New member
Nov 18, 2009
298
0
0
The difference is that Valve has made it quite explicitly clear that whenever their company comes to an end, their games will live past them and their fans will be able to enjoy what they have purchased even if Valve is not there to be able to support them.

Microsoft doesn't even guarantee that they will support their own product after a new generation comes out. Pure digital download without some kind of hard copy and the option for operation independent of the service is just asking for lost product complaints, one way or the other. There is no guarantee that we would be able to have Xbox One games after the Xbox One cloud dies, and some day it -will- die. Games should be able to live as long as people want to play them.

This cloud-calling trigger risks making an entire generation of video games 'lost games' at some point; it doesn't matter if Halo 5 turns out to be a touching drama and becomes the greatest FPS to hit the market in a decade if no one can play it for themselves to prove it, after its cloud support is gone.

DRM's record, so far, is one that has edged into unhelpfulness; pirates seem to have better luck cracking a game than a game with what I'm going to call external DRM for convenience's sake, which in this case is anything that triggers outside of gameplay. This external DRM in turn tends to inconvenience innocent end-users the most (Sony rootkit blues, anyone?). This is what the cloud is, yet amusingly, for all its comparisons to Xbox One's cloud, valid or otherwise, Steam doesn't demand the same constant external call; you can sign in once in offline mode, and be offline for a vast majority of their games, never once connected to the internet and yet still playing.

Internal gameplay DRM like Mirror's Edge and its slowdown mechanic for unlicensed copies, on the other hand, are self-contained, at much less risk to break a system, and usually end up much better-accepted, especially since they've been using in-game DRM tricks since even the NES and SNES age. Cutting the game short or deliberately glitching it because it's pirated is a pretty clever way to waste the time of the pirates, because time and effort is the one thing they can't get back.

Nothing quite like denying a person their accomplishment and letting them know they've wasted their time to frustrate or emotionally crush them.
 

ssgt splatter

New member
Oct 8, 2008
3,276
0
0
Neverhoodian said:
Phew, for a second there I thought Microsoft was actually bringing DRM back. Turns out the OP was just making a sensationalist title.
So this is a fake topic? Microsoft isn't that big of an idiot to bring it back?
 

Ed130 The Vanguard

(Insert witty quote here)
Sep 10, 2008
3,782
0
0
OutsiderEX said:
mad825 said:
That time of the year when 4Chan pays a visit to the Escapist?

Say what you want, all those features can be implemented without DRM. Take gog as a small example even though it doesn't have it's own client per se. You can download what you want, when you want without having to verify the game and you can download a small program to manage the downloads as well as keeping the game up-to-date

Whatever the case may be, you don't need DRM for anything other than for control and/or restriction.
What the hell? /v/'s been adamantly against the Xbone since the first details came out.
I think this is /b/ not /v/.

This seems more their style.
 

UnnDunn

New member
Aug 15, 2006
237
0
0
Saika Renegade said:
The difference is that Valve has made it quite explicitly clear that whenever their company comes to an end, their games will live past them and their fans will be able to enjoy what they have purchased even if Valve is not there to be able to support them.
Actually, no they haven't. They have made no such promise, and they wouldn't even be in a position to make such a promise for games they don't publish.
 

evenest

New member
Dec 5, 2009
167
0
0
If I'm not mistaken, you would still need to download the game to your friend's machine, would you not? It seems easier and quicker to me to just bring your disc and put it in the console and begin playing. This argument FOR the original Xbox's plan seems to ignore the fact that it is as easy or easier to bring the disc along with you. No download time, no delay.

Also to speak to the original poster's statement: I still rent games. We have a video store nearby where I rent a game that I am not certain I want to buy or one that I cannot purchase yet but would like to experience (even if it is only for a weekend). I've ended up buying a couple of games because I enjoyed them when I rented them. A sale that the company might not have had otherwise. The inability to rent (and therefore try) a game would result in my purchasing far fewer games than I might otherwise.
 

Traun255

New member
Jun 16, 2009
158
0
0
It is not a terrible reason. Businesses won't work with each other because they don't trust each other because of decisions they have made. It works the same for customers.
 

go-10

New member
Feb 3, 2010
1,557
0
0
I have bought 4 PS3's over the course of its life span and I have downloaded games I bought through the PSN on all 4

and you know what else PS3, has no DRM and I was still able to download my PSN games on any PS3 as long as I properly signed in to my account. Between a group of friends we all had each others accounts and were able to share games, dlc's, and whatever else we would buy through the PSN. WITHOUT DRM!!!!


also you're probably a fellow /v/irgin but I guess you didn't get the memo, we're not raiding the escapist this year. Especially when both Microsoft and Sony are launching new consoles with their own forums
also Cabella's Dangerous Hunt on the Mii Verse is where most of us are right now... so yeah, a raid doesn't work on your own
...
...
...

PS your avatar sucks!
 

prpshrt

New member
Jun 18, 2012
260
0
0
Having the DRM back would mean an always online thing or at least having the xbone call home to let you play games. No thank you. I still think that needing xbox live gold to use it for netflix and other things is absolutely retarded. Very anti consumer. It's a great device, just not too fond of the restrictions on it.
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,310
0
0
How do you use steam and say it's the same thing as the XBONE DRM? You have no clue what you're talking about, at all.

That whole amazing game sharing thing? It was highly understated that publishers CONTROL that feature, so if they only wanted a 45 minute demo or just demo that's all you could share and that's it.
So that means if you and your brother want to play a the same game you bought and he has a separate account he may not at all be able to play it despite having the disc! Some games don't have more than one save so think about that one then yeah?

The HUGE difference between steam DRM and XBONE DRM is 75% off on sales and NOTHING OFF EVER, and saying "they could have sales" doesn't factor in because it's not certain and there's been nothing said on it.

There is no amount of marketing that will cover the difference between noninvasive DRM and what XBONE has

 

Brotha Desmond

New member
Jan 3, 2011
347
0
0
I find it amusing that people are assuming that Xbox one would be like steam just because they were going all digital. There is absolutely no proof that it would be that way and not just a system where you need to be online to use. As for a console steam we already have something like that, Playstation plus. I get access to a lot of free games like gravity rush, wipeout 2048, Saints row the third, Hitman absolution, etc. Also they have sales up to 75% off. If anyone I would trust Sony to eventually turn more like steam since they show signs of it already and isn't just blind speculation.
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,473
0
0
IceForce said:
That gets me wondering, how much does Microsoft pay its shills to join forums like this and spread good PR?

I reckon I could do a better job than the shills I've seen around here.
I doubt s/he's a Microsoft's shill. The tone isn't to convince, but to provoke and annoy.
Nevermind that it is deliberately invoking overwhelmingly negative press that isn't even relevant anymore, following "Microsoft's 180" on the matter.

The topic title is a complete lie, the poll serves no purpose to the actual subject, the OP has no real argument and is only an "entitlement" away from hitting provocative buzzword bingo.

I'm calling for the topic to be locked on the grounds that it has no real discussion merit.
 

j1015

New member
Sep 6, 2012
29
0
0
OP has accomplished their goal

Has not responded for 5 hours, yet everyone is severely agitated.
 

Amir Kondori

New member
Apr 11, 2013
932
0
0
Dear sir I kindly suggest you take the bullshit you are peddling on down the road to another house more receptive of it. If the Escapist was a real neighborhood you'd be getting bottles tossed at your head until you stopped spouting lunacy in the streets and made your way down the road.
 

IceForce

Is this memes?
Legacy
Dec 11, 2012
2,384
16
13
Atmos Duality said:
I doubt s/he's a Microsoft's shill. The tone isn't to convince, but to provoke and annoy.
Nevermind that it is deliberately invoking overwhelmingly negative press that isn't even relevant anymore, following "Microsoft's 180" on the matter.

The topic title is a complete lie, the poll serves no purpose to the actual subject, the OP has no real argument and is only an "entitlement" away from hitting provocative buzzword bingo.

I'm calling for the topic to be locked on the grounds that it has no real discussion merit.
You're right.

Actually, the OP seems to have done a disappearing trick. Where did they go?
It's especially telling in their other thread, where they claimed they would "reply to everyone".