I see what you did there...DevilWolf47 said:Haruhi only knows just how many galaxies there are.
I see what you did there...DevilWolf47 said:Haruhi only knows just how many galaxies there are.
To quote the movie "Contact," "It would be an awful waste of space."Wierdguy said:Just imagine this: In our galaxy there are hundreds of billions of stars, and a countless more planets. The only problem at the moment is that seeing planets is hard since they dont give of any light so next to their star theyre nearly impossible to find. But despite this scientists have observed a near 200.000 planets they think might hold atleast the nessecary ingredients for life. So, 200.000 planets with potential for life that we've found so far out of the billions upon billions of planets in our galaxy, is it unreasonable to think theres life on some of them?
I'm very wary about your 99% statistic.Wierdguy said:Actually scientists are very sure water is the number one requirement for life. There is a dessert here on earth (the name eludes me at the moment but something in style with atachama) where it litteraly NEVER rains. There is NO water there whatsoever. Yet researchers hasnt found even a trace of the most primitive forms of life.Riddle78 said:You're working under the assumption that the life MUST be on Earthlike planets. For all we know,evolution could have created a race of intelligent beings that either don't need water,or can produce their own naturally. It's impossible to truly know until we actually find more life,intelligent or otherwise.
There is life in the most unfathomable places here on earth, but the one place that doesnt have a single drop of water fails to sustain even the most basic forms. If there could be life without water they would atleast find traces of it in that dessert but there is none.
I get what youre saying that we cant be 100% sure, but Id say scientists are atleast 99% in agreement that life requires water.
Perhaps no life on Earth has ever adapted to a waterless environment simply because they already evolved far enough to rely on water. Or, they could use another chemical to fill that same role, but there is also a lack of any similar molecules in the desert.Wierdguy said:Actually scientists are very sure water is the number one requirement for life. There is a dessert here on earth (the name eludes me at the moment but something in style with atachama) where it litteraly NEVER rains. There is NO water there whatsoever. Yet researchers hasnt found even a trace of the most primitive forms of life.Riddle78 said:You're working under the assumption that the life MUST be on Earthlike planets. For all we know,evolution could have created a race of intelligent beings that either don't need water,or can produce their own naturally. It's impossible to truly know until we actually find more life,intelligent or otherwise.
There is life in the most unfathomable places here on earth, but the one place that doesnt have a single drop of water fails to sustain even the most basic forms. If there could be life without water they would atleast find traces of it in that dessert but there is none.
I get what youre saying that we cant be 100% sure, but Id say scientists are atleast 99% in agreement that life requires water.
That is a matter of opinion. I never agreed with the notion that the odds in evolution are truly so small. Yes the chance that we would exactly evolve the way we did are quiet small. But I think that the chance that some primate would eventually evolve in an intelligent lifeform is 2 in 3 at least. And otherwise some bird species might have evolved.Serving UpSmiles said:You do realize our entire existince as the human race is a once in a trillion chance right? If some predator murdered the first homo sapians (apes) We wouldn't have survived all these years.
Anyone who truly, honestly believes that there is no life anywhere else in the infinite cosmos needs to be shot for gross stupidity and lack of reasoning ability.Wierdguy said:-snip-
You are assuming that all life must be like life on Earth, and that is an inherently flawed assumption. To put it simply, we cannot assume that all life in the universe must follow the laws of evolution on Earth.Wierdguy said:Actually, there are requirements for life. Water is the most important, no water; no life. Second of all the planet cant be too close to the sun or all life will burn up and all water will evaporate. But it cant bee too far away either since life requires LIQUID water, frozen water is as useless as no water.
There is a "comfort" zone around most stars where scientists believe life can exist, and Titan and pluto is not within ours.
Actually, Ethyl-Alcohol is just one possible replacement for water. (There are two, but I left my Astronomy book at the house, since I am hanging at my girlfriend's waiting her to finish her shower.) Life is entirely possible in forms we don't recognize.Wierdguy said:Actually, there are requirements for life. Water is the most important, no water; no life. Second of all the planet cant be too close to the sun or all life will burn up and all water will evaporate. But it cant bee too far away either since life requires LIQUID water, frozen water is as useless as no water.Riddle78 said:It's quite possible for life to exist on Titan or Pluto. Just because it isn't Earth-like doesn't mean it can't sustain life;evolution works like that!
There is a "comfort" zone around most stars where scientists believe life can exist, and Titan and pluto is not within ours.
Cool. I am thinking of Astrophysicist or something definitely Astronomy based...similar.squirrel said:I don't have any fermi beliefs about extraterrestrial life.
Zing!
Extremely forced, didn't-really-make-sense Zing.
But.. I think that there's a strong possibility. I wouldn't say I believe in it, because belief is not really a good thing in the absence of evidence. But it's certainly very likely to exist. Likely enough for me to want to become an astrobiologist, mayhaps..