Poll: You Discover Your Child Will Be...

Recommended Videos

Queen Michael

has read 4,010 manga books
Jun 9, 2009
10,400
0
0
As long as my wife was okay with an abortion, I'd say YESYESYES. I don't mean to be cruel, but I just don't have what it takes to raise a kid like that. I wouldn't be one of those people who say their handicap is an advantage, I'd just be miserable.
 

Brandon237

New member
Mar 10, 2010
2,959
0
0
I think I would have to abort. I just couldn't handle something like that.

If you abort, it depresses you and leaves its mark for about a year.
If you keep it, it leaves its mark for the rest of your life. It also wouldn't have any life, it would be perpetual torture. I couldn't keep the baby alive, and it would help it more to prevent suffering.

the decision would be hard and sad, but some things must be done.
 

Dapsen

New member
Nov 9, 2008
607
0
0
Abort. No thought to it. It would be cruel to everyone involved, to let the child live.
If my partner then disagreed with me, I don't know what I'd do. I would of course work my ass off trying to persuade her, but if that didn't work... Damn.
 

RanD00M

New member
Oct 26, 2008
6,947
0
0
Abort it in an instant.Although I would want for my mate to have an abortion as soon as she were to find out that she is pregnant.I have no fucking interest in having a child.Not in this lifetime.
 

EightGaugeHippo

New member
Apr 6, 2010
2,076
0
0
I dont want to have any kids YET, so if it will be born with metal disablities I choose to abort. Its not that im a selfish dick, I just dont want to support a child before I can fully support myself and if it has retardation it would be a painful existence for me, the mother and most importantly the baby.
 

irtaco

New member
Dec 2, 2009
139
0
0
I'd feel like a monster for the rest of my life, but I would abort it. It wouldn't be right letting him go through life in a world that mocks and hates him.
 

Addendum_Forthcoming

Queen of the Edit
Feb 4, 2009
3,647
0
0
HG131 said:
PaulH said:
HG131 said:
Well, unless the fetus is "accidentally" killed. Plus, something that will only be on the level of a 1 year old for the rest of it's life =/= Midget.
You know, if a woman wants to have her child and she 'accidentally' miscarriages due to your 'misadventures' then I think people may have a good cause to put you away for 8 years. Okay but my point was where do you draw the line?

In the end it's about what the parents want (or more specifically the mother).
Well, the mother shouldn't be the only one with any say. Besides, who would find out if I hired a hired gun to abort it with a bullet?
Well unless you're also talking about killing the mother then I think the motive is pretty clear if you hired a killer to enter her abode and execute the child. Sure you could make the scene *look* like a bungled robbery but what "trespass to commit grand larceny eventuating in dual homicide" case have you heard of that involved a robber executing a child given they aren't going to beable to provide much of a testimonial and most robbers are just in it for the money.

So you have motive, money and means (which mostly comes from having money) ... the big 3 that usually put people behind bars with sufficient investigation.
 

Addendum_Forthcoming

Queen of the Edit
Feb 4, 2009
3,647
0
0
HG131 said:
PaulH said:
HG131 said:
PaulH said:
HG131 said:
Well, unless the fetus is "accidentally" killed. Plus, something that will only be on the level of a 1 year old for the rest of it's life =/= Midget.
You know, if a woman wants to have her child and she 'accidentally' miscarriages due to your 'misadventures' then I think people may have a good cause to put you away for 8 years. Okay but my point was where do you draw the line?

In the end it's about what the parents want (or more specifically the mother).
Well, the mother shouldn't be the only one with any say. Besides, who would find out if I hired a hired gun to abort it with a bullet?
Well unless you're also talking about killing the mother then I think the motive is pretty clear if you hired a killer to enter her abode and execute the child. Sure you could make the scene *look* like a bungled robbery but what "trespass to commit grand larceny eventuating in dual homicide" case have you heard of that involved a robber executing a child given they aren't going to beable to provide much of a testimonial and most robbers are just in it for the money.

So you have motive, money and means (which mostly comes from having money) ... the big 3 that usually put people behind bars with sufficient investigation.
Make it look like a mugging gone bad where the bullet just "happens" to kill the thing.
It's not a 'thing' and what hired killer are you going to find that's willing to execute a baby? Not only this but how exactly are you going to make it look like a bungled mugging that ends up killing them both? The hired killer is just going to stand there, point a gun and say "Look *****, if you don't start wrestling with me I'll kill you both"?

What hired killer is going to be willing to leave trace evidence at the scene such as blood, hair or skin of himself to 'prove' that it wasn't a hit and just a mugging gone "wrong"?

How exactly are you going to make it look like it was an 'accident'? A simple enough forensic examination of both bodies would show the trajectory of the bullet's path ... so a mother with her stroller are not going to get hit by any 'accident' unless they are struggling on the ground.

The best way of doing it would be to make it look like a kidnapping, but that poses more problems because the first thing ivestigators examine would be the family in said occurrences.

And no ... I'm pro-choice ... but at the same time it should be the mother that has any final decision given that in the end it's her body, and if she says she wants to keep it and the father says 'no' you just end up in a he says she says situation. Whereupon you have to ultimately decide what should be done, in whch case it would fall to the mother anyways, because if she desperately wishes to keep the child any means to force her to bend to the will of the father would be inhumane and grossly unconstitutional.
 

CobraX

New member
Jul 4, 2010
637
0
0
Abdoption. I don't want to raise the kid. It's a terrible thing to say, but there ya go. I wouldn't abort it because, I'm pretty sure the Kid would prefer to be alive, even if he ends up having a crap life.
 

Blackmagic1515

New member
Jul 6, 2009
778
0
0
Abort it. Nobody deserves to live like that and my life would be horrible looking after it. Besides that I never want children anyway, so it would be terminated regardless.
 

Lizmichi

Detective Prince
Jul 2, 2009
4,809
0
0
I've always been pro-abortion, because of cases like this (well and rape cases) is why I stand for it. Why let a child live a life of suffering and why make you suffer as well? Putting it up for adoption just pushes the suffering to someone else. So yes I would have an abortion and I'm sure my boyfriend or husband would agree with me. I can have another child but why birth one that can't have a life?
 

RadiusXd

New member
Jun 2, 2010
743
0
0
Good god people! abort that thing!
Not if i had a billion dollars would i subject my seed to that torture, I'm not sure if I would want to live if i had less than average intellegence, letalone full blown mega tard.
not only that, but the embarrasment of having such bad seed, think about it.
Everyone would know you as the guy with the retard kid, you would lose most other identity.
Screw life being sacred, even monkeys can be as intelligent as 5 year olds.
 

RadiusXd

New member
Jun 2, 2010
743
0
0
HG131 said:
PaulH said:
HG131 said:
PaulH said:
HG131 said:
PaulH said:
HG131 said:
Well, unless the fetus is "accidentally" killed. Plus, something that will only be on the level of a 1 year old for the rest of it's life =/= Midget.
You know, if a woman wants to have her child and she 'accidentally' miscarriages due to your 'misadventures' then I think people may have a good cause to put you away for 8 years. Okay but my point was where do you draw the line?

In the end it's about what the parents want (or more specifically the mother).
Well, the mother shouldn't be the only one with any say. Besides, who would find out if I hired a hired gun to abort it with a bullet?
Well unless you're also talking about killing the mother then I think the motive is pretty clear if you hired a killer to enter her abode and execute the child. Sure you could make the scene *look* like a bungled robbery but what "trespass to commit grand larceny eventuating in dual homicide" case have you heard of that involved a robber executing a child given they aren't going to beable to provide much of a testimonial and most robbers are just in it for the money.

So you have motive, money and means (which mostly comes from having money) ... the big 3 that usually put people behind bars with sufficient investigation.
Make it look like a mugging gone bad where the bullet just "happens" to kill the thing.
It's not a 'thing' and what hired killer are you going to find that's willing to execute a baby? Not only this but how exactly are you going to make it look like a bungled mugging that ends up killing them both? The hired killer is just going to stand there, point a gun and say "Look *****, if you don't start wrestling with me I'll kill you both"?

What hired killer is going to be willing to leave trace evidence at the scene such as blood, hair or skin of himself to 'prove' that it wasn't a hit and just a mugging gone "wrong"?

How exactly are you going to make it look like it was an 'accident'? A simple enough forensic examination of both bodies would show the trajectory of the bullet's path ... so a mother with her stroller are not going to get hit by any 'accident' unless they are struggling on the ground.

The best way of doing it would be to make it look like a kidnapping, but that poses more problems because the first thing ivestigators examine would be the family in said occurrences.

And no ... I'm pro-choice ... but at the same time it should be the mother that has any final decision given that in the end it's her body, and if she says she wants to keep it and the father says 'no' you just end up in a he says she says situation. Whereupon you have to ultimately decide what should be done, in whch case it would fall to the mother anyways, because if she desperately wishes to keep the child any means to force her to bend to the will of the father would be inhumane and grossly unconstitutional.
But forcing the father to bend to her will is so humane. Also, make it look like a mugging where he accidental pulled the trigger. And yes, it is a thing. A genderless parasite.
just hire someone to punch her and give her a miscarrige, no need fo a piece.
 

Yureina

Who are you?
May 6, 2010
7,098
0
0
Abort, sadly. There are fates worse than death, and living in that manner would be one of them. Even so, I would have some serious difficulties with making that kind of decision.
 

Mr. Gency

New member
Jan 26, 2010
1,702
0
0
I picked abortion so quick, it's scary. I already know I have limited tolerance for such people. I can't even consider raising a child like that for the rest of my life.