As long as my wife was okay with an abortion, I'd say YESYESYES. I don't mean to be cruel, but I just don't have what it takes to raise a kid like that. I wouldn't be one of those people who say their handicap is an advantage, I'd just be miserable.
Well unless you're also talking about killing the mother then I think the motive is pretty clear if you hired a killer to enter her abode and execute the child. Sure you could make the scene *look* like a bungled robbery but what "trespass to commit grand larceny eventuating in dual homicide" case have you heard of that involved a robber executing a child given they aren't going to beable to provide much of a testimonial and most robbers are just in it for the money.HG131 said:Well, the mother shouldn't be the only one with any say. Besides, who would find out if I hired a hired gun to abort it with a bullet?PaulH said:You know, if a woman wants to have her child and she 'accidentally' miscarriages due to your 'misadventures' then I think people may have a good cause to put you away for 8 years. Okay but my point was where do you draw the line?HG131 said:Well, unless the fetus is "accidentally" killed. Plus, something that will only be on the level of a 1 year old for the rest of it's life =/= Midget.
In the end it's about what the parents want (or more specifically the mother).
It's not a 'thing' and what hired killer are you going to find that's willing to execute a baby? Not only this but how exactly are you going to make it look like a bungled mugging that ends up killing them both? The hired killer is just going to stand there, point a gun and say "Look *****, if you don't start wrestling with me I'll kill you both"?HG131 said:Make it look like a mugging gone bad where the bullet just "happens" to kill the thing.PaulH said:Well unless you're also talking about killing the mother then I think the motive is pretty clear if you hired a killer to enter her abode and execute the child. Sure you could make the scene *look* like a bungled robbery but what "trespass to commit grand larceny eventuating in dual homicide" case have you heard of that involved a robber executing a child given they aren't going to beable to provide much of a testimonial and most robbers are just in it for the money.HG131 said:Well, the mother shouldn't be the only one with any say. Besides, who would find out if I hired a hired gun to abort it with a bullet?PaulH said:You know, if a woman wants to have her child and she 'accidentally' miscarriages due to your 'misadventures' then I think people may have a good cause to put you away for 8 years. Okay but my point was where do you draw the line?HG131 said:Well, unless the fetus is "accidentally" killed. Plus, something that will only be on the level of a 1 year old for the rest of it's life =/= Midget.
In the end it's about what the parents want (or more specifically the mother).
So you have motive, money and means (which mostly comes from having money) ... the big 3 that usually put people behind bars with sufficient investigation.
just hire someone to punch her and give her a miscarrige, no need fo a piece.HG131 said:But forcing the father to bend to her will is so humane. Also, make it look like a mugging where he accidental pulled the trigger. And yes, it is a thing. A genderless parasite.PaulH said:It's not a 'thing' and what hired killer are you going to find that's willing to execute a baby? Not only this but how exactly are you going to make it look like a bungled mugging that ends up killing them both? The hired killer is just going to stand there, point a gun and say "Look *****, if you don't start wrestling with me I'll kill you both"?HG131 said:Make it look like a mugging gone bad where the bullet just "happens" to kill the thing.PaulH said:Well unless you're also talking about killing the mother then I think the motive is pretty clear if you hired a killer to enter her abode and execute the child. Sure you could make the scene *look* like a bungled robbery but what "trespass to commit grand larceny eventuating in dual homicide" case have you heard of that involved a robber executing a child given they aren't going to beable to provide much of a testimonial and most robbers are just in it for the money.HG131 said:Well, the mother shouldn't be the only one with any say. Besides, who would find out if I hired a hired gun to abort it with a bullet?PaulH said:You know, if a woman wants to have her child and she 'accidentally' miscarriages due to your 'misadventures' then I think people may have a good cause to put you away for 8 years. Okay but my point was where do you draw the line?HG131 said:Well, unless the fetus is "accidentally" killed. Plus, something that will only be on the level of a 1 year old for the rest of it's life =/= Midget.
In the end it's about what the parents want (or more specifically the mother).
So you have motive, money and means (which mostly comes from having money) ... the big 3 that usually put people behind bars with sufficient investigation.
What hired killer is going to be willing to leave trace evidence at the scene such as blood, hair or skin of himself to 'prove' that it wasn't a hit and just a mugging gone "wrong"?
How exactly are you going to make it look like it was an 'accident'? A simple enough forensic examination of both bodies would show the trajectory of the bullet's path ... so a mother with her stroller are not going to get hit by any 'accident' unless they are struggling on the ground.
The best way of doing it would be to make it look like a kidnapping, but that poses more problems because the first thing ivestigators examine would be the family in said occurrences.
And no ... I'm pro-choice ... but at the same time it should be the mother that has any final decision given that in the end it's her body, and if she says she wants to keep it and the father says 'no' you just end up in a he says she says situation. Whereupon you have to ultimately decide what should be done, in whch case it would fall to the mother anyways, because if she desperately wishes to keep the child any means to force her to bend to the will of the father would be inhumane and grossly unconstitutional.