FolkLikePanda said:
You could say I'm facist for not liking some foreigners coming into the country and not adapting to our customs (how the crap is Christmas racist and why should people be fired and have their job given to some non-English speaking Polish arse) but you could say I'm communist for thinking people should have equal rights (to a certain degree) but I disagree because in the end some people will become more equal than others in the long run so it can never work. BTW don't call me evil or cruel hearted, you need foreigners in a country otherwise the country would be isolated from the world, plus there would be no culture I just believe British jobs for British workers and kick people off the dole, and also the aparthied in South Africa was bad, South Africa is a black people's country. My stepdad thinks BNP have some good ideas (he votes UKIP for not being over the top) but he worked in South Africa on a labour trade and he said the way they treated the black workers was horrible, the white minority laughing at them when they fell off a piece of scaffholding nearly smashing their skulls. And the EU is balls, why should we let Romanian bloody rapists live in our country no questions asked? So really what I'm saying is after this pointless speech is I don't know my politcal views, they are probably centered but WOOP GO MONSTER RAVING LOONY PARTY! NO COAL SHOES FTW!
Your very far right.. but not racist, fortunately. You sound rather like a rather radical Daily Mail reader. Your a right-wing conservative, in favour of isolationism and you would vote either UKIP or Tory.
Well in some aspects i'm virtually the opposite matey. I am generally center wing, with perhaps left leaning tendencies. For instance I'm in favour of tighter and better assessed government benefits for individual's, but still think that government benefit is a good thing. I believe the role of the government is to ensure that there are the necessities for society to function fairly and efficiently, and act as a referee within a free market. That mean's the government provides education and health care, as well as unemployment and retirement benefit. The government could also provide infrastructure and transport, although ideally this would compete against private companies, along with private companies providing health care and education. The government should ensure that private companies are competing fairly against each other, and attempt to keep a fairly balanced "free market" by various "watch-dogs" and agencies.
The government should play a minimum role in the personal lives of it's citizen's, only stepping in when one citizen compromises the right's of another. (These right's being right of life, safety, property etc). The state's laws should be based around this philosophy.
In terms of international politics's i'm in favour of state's actively co-operating with each other in economic, political and militarily affair's, sharing politics's and economics's with each other leading to closer ties and integration between nation's. This lead's to a stronger global economy and annihilates the possibility of war between nation's. After all, your obligation to your country falls secondary to your obligation towards the betterment of humankind as a whole. Your nationality should not be a barrier in this world.
