Pop: Why all the hate?

Recommended Videos

LiftYourSkinnyFists

New member
Aug 15, 2009
912
0
0
mistergobbles said:
So, there seems to be a lot of animosity towards electronic pop music on these boards. Granted, most of the Top 40 stuff is absolutely horrible...

But, and I'm speaking as a huge metalhead here, sometimes I just have the need to put on something danceable, catchy, and simple. It makes me feel good to listen to it, in a different way than anything else. I don't really listen to any Top 40 stuff, but the indie things like Breathe Electric I'm a big fan of, and it really makes you wonder why that stuff isn't on the radio and Far East Movement is...

But what do you guys think? Do you not like pop as a genre, or is it only the Top 40 stuff that irks you? And do we have anyone who actually enjoys the *ahem* more questionable parts of the Top 40 (we won't judge)?

EDIT: I sincerely apologize for the thread duplication, the forums went down and I didn't see the notification until after I had already tried it a couple times. Please don't report me =(
Pop is misunderstood... top 40 doesn't count as pop, Pop is a genre not a specific bracket that requires songs to meet certain criteria to gain the brand pop.
 

MisterGobbles

New member
Nov 30, 2009
747
0
0
LiftYourSkinnyFists said:
mistergobbles said:
So, there seems to be a lot of animosity towards electronic pop music on these boards. Granted, most of the Top 40 stuff is absolutely horrible...

But, and I'm speaking as a huge metalhead here, sometimes I just have the need to put on something danceable, catchy, and simple. It makes me feel good to listen to it, in a different way than anything else. I don't really listen to any Top 40 stuff, but the indie things like Breathe Electric I'm a big fan of, and it really makes you wonder why that stuff isn't on the radio and Far East Movement is...

But what do you guys think? Do you not like pop as a genre, or is it only the Top 40 stuff that irks you? And do we have anyone who actually enjoys the *ahem* more questionable parts of the Top 40 (we won't judge)?

EDIT: I sincerely apologize for the thread duplication, the forums went down and I didn't see the notification until after I had already tried it a couple times. Please don't report me =(
Pop is misunderstood... top 40 doesn't count as pop, Pop is a genre not a specific bracket that requires songs to meet certain criteria to gain the brand pop.
Well yes, I mean things like Pet Shop Boys and arguably The Bravery are pop. And there's a wide range of things that can be considered pop or poppy or have pop elements, it's a genre label more than anything else. I think the people who are posting in the thread are more interested in talking about Top 40's pop, however, although I just mean any sort of modern pop, whatever your interpretation of it may be.
 

Bender Rodriguez

New member
Sep 2, 2010
352
0
0
Its not musical anymore, thats why pretty much everything ends around 1995 for me.
Then again I'm a prog rock guy.

Depresses me how people like Simon Cowell doesn't see a pattern, so many people are singing old songs in the auditions.
People are turning to the older stuff, and until modern music gets more musical its going to stay that way.

Listen to Sledgehammer by Peter Gabriel, and then Kesha.
Judge yourself.
 

gunheads

New member
Sep 6, 2010
62
0
0
As a English metaler, I grew up around the gods of heavy metal, Iron maiden, Sabbath, Judas and many more ect. So as most would guess I find most modern pop to be unbearable to listen too, I just frustrates me, But I will say that I enjoy a very small number of songs from pop. I honestly have no problem with others musical taste, but on the Internet, everything you like will be challenged as much as possible. So Thats why I think theres hate.
 

white_salad

New member
Aug 24, 2008
567
0
0
lacktheknack said:
IBlackKiteI said:
The way I see it the only thing worse than generic rock is pop.

Thats all I have to say about that.
Why?

I understand people hating this (I certainly do):

<youtube=3taEuL4EHAg>

But what's wrong with this?

<youtube=qrO4YZeyl0I>
I find myself listening to more lady gaga more and more each day. She's quite enjoyable. Plus I find her strangely hot....please don't judge me
 

TeeBs

New member
Oct 9, 2010
1,564
0
0
Bender Rodriguez said:
Its not musical anymore, thats why pretty much everything ends around 1995 for me.
Then again I'm a prog rock guy.

Depresses me how people like Simon Cowell doesn't see a pattern, so many people are singing old songs in the auditions.
People are turning to the older stuff, and until modern music gets more musical its going to stay that way.

Listen to Sledgehammer by Peter Gabriel, and then Kesha.
Judge yourself.
http://www.cracked.com/article_1898...dern-life-that-are-statistically-b.s._p2.html

Skip to one.
 

Gildan Bladeborn

New member
Aug 11, 2009
3,044
0
0
The problem with asking questions like "Do you dislike Pop as a genre?" is that agreeing on just what constitutes that genre is going to be problematic. If you suppose that Pop is "music that is popular", well that could be all sorts of things (usually not very good things, but a wide variety nonetheless). We could decide that Pop is music where the 'artist' plays no instruments and in fact writes none of the material, and it is in fact quite safe to classify anything that fits that description as "Pop", but how then would you account for all the music that sounds just like it (or quite similar) where those things aren't true? For that matter, what the hell do "Pop Rock" or "Pop Metal" mean? Is the perception that Pop embodies simplicity and commercialism a given so we can apply it as a qualifier/slur when describing music from any genre that trends in a certain direction?

But in the interest of providing something that vaguely resembles a coherent opinion, I do not much care for what is generally agreed upon as "Pop", and the Pop that I do like probably isn't actually Pop from any viewpoint other than my own. I don't much care for simplicity as a general rule, and I don't dance or otherwise care about how well music lends itself towards dancing, so suggesting that music is "fun" is going to fall on deaf ears here. Catchy hooks are more often a liability than a virtue, as they can ensure that almost insultingly stupid lyrics get stuck in your head forever, and Pop is basically nothing but hooks.

In essence, I don't care for Pop because it's an almost uniformly shallow genre, abounding with crap lyrics, crap melodies, crap take-your-pick; even when it's good I probably won't like it, and there are few things more annoying than crappy pop songs that you cannot escape. At least with say... wretchedly awful deathcore (pretty much all of it) the one bright side is that you're unlikely to ever have to sit through it against your will, unless you have crappy friends or government agents are torturing you for some reason - Pop is everywhere though, you have to really work to not hear it.
 

Kenko

New member
Jul 25, 2010
1,098
0
0

Proper 80's pop is usually awesome. The stuff thats being made today is just garbage, theres a few gems here and there however.

I know its a rock-song. But its quite pop'y.
 

ChaoticKraus

New member
Jul 26, 2010
598
0
0
Because people feel the need to complain about anything popular that they are not personally a fan of. Either to feel "cool" or simply some search to validate themselves. Unfortunately this "validation" leads to arrogance and the perception that they are "above" the "stupid sheep" that listens to "crap mainstream music". Elitism is pathetic.

I don't judge pop as a whole since i like and dislike different artists from the genre. And i don't complain about the ones i don't like.

Personally i do adore meself some Lady Gaga. That woman makes the music equal to heroin in addictiveness.
 

Anarchemitis

New member
Dec 23, 2007
9,102
0
0
It's because it's all so heavily doctored up. The ratio of Sound Engineers to performers is above 0.25, which is more than too much.

Autotune was designed to make a perfect singer out of an excellent singer, not make a singer out of a not singer. This is why I enjoy classical music and opera: not only is it impossible for autotune to 'repair' an intertonal sound source such as instruments, but it would be scandalous if such implementations were employed to give a performance. Either you can play and you get famous, or you can't and you don't. It doesn't depend on appearance at all.

I mean really, which do you think should garner more respect and knowability:

Teenage youtube kid

Old jewish guy
 

Evil Teddie

New member
Feb 7, 2011
52
0
0
Like all genres,there's bad and good and it is also up to personal taste. If you don't like mordern, recent stuff you can go to the oldies or just wait it. The Internet flame hate is just because of the 'fanboy' culture.
 

Bender Rodriguez

New member
Sep 2, 2010
352
0
0
TeeBs said:
Bender Rodriguez said:
Its not musical anymore, thats why pretty much everything ends around 1995 for me.
Then again I'm a prog rock guy.

Depresses me how people like Simon Cowell doesn't see a pattern, so many people are singing old songs in the auditions.
People are turning to the older stuff, and until modern music gets more musical its going to stay that way.

Listen to Sledgehammer by Peter Gabriel, and then Kesha.
Judge yourself.
http://www.cracked.com/article_1898...dern-life-that-are-statistically-b.s._p2.html

Skip to one.
Your missing the point, the song i mentioned was a good example of melodic music.
Todays music sure has a melody, but its electronic and stale.

Thats my problem, not that I'm cursing new POP music like an old man - I just don't like its technique and sound in general.
Sure we have good stuff in the other genres, but POP...as in POP isn't very good.
Ain't got soul.
 

Jekken6

New member
Aug 19, 2009
1,285
0
0
Because modern pop is almost everywhere and most of them aren't really artists, more, "recorders" and the sound engineering guys at whatever label probably put in more effort than the "musicians".
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
white_salad said:
I find myself listening to more lady gaga more and more each day. She's quite enjoyable. Plus I find her strangely hot....please don't judge me
Well, I certainly pick the right video for that... >_<

It's okay. I've seen her in her pre-Lady Gaga days, and she's actually not unpleasant to look at at all. Of course, she kinda wrecked everything with the meat dress...
 

FamoFunk

Dad, I'm in space.
Mar 10, 2010
2,628
0
0
It's not music I love, but like you I can listen to it and enjoy it. It's easy, catchy and can be quite enjoyable.
 

MisterGobbles

New member
Nov 30, 2009
747
0
0
Gildan Bladeborn said:
The problem with asking questions like "Do you dislike Pop as a genre?" is that agreeing on just what constitutes that genre is going to be problematic. If you suppose that Pop is "music that is popular", well that could be all sorts of things (usually not very good things, but a wide variety nonetheless). We could decide that Pop is music where the 'artist' plays no instruments and in fact writes none of the material, and it is in fact quite safe to classify anything that fits that description as "Pop", but how then would you account for all the music that sounds just like it (or quite similar) where those things aren't true? For that matter, what the hell do "Pop Rock" or "Pop Metal" mean? Is the perception that Pop embodies simplicity and commercialism a given so we can apply it as a qualifier/slur when describing music from any genre that trends in a certain direction?

But in the interest of providing something that vaguely resembles a coherent opinion, I do not much care for what is generally agreed upon as "Pop", and the Pop that I do like probably isn't actually Pop from any viewpoint other than my own. I don't much care for simplicity as a general rule, and I don't dance or otherwise care about how well music lends itself towards dancing, so suggesting that music is "fun" is going to fall on deaf ears here. Catchy hooks are more often a liability than a virtue, as they can ensure that almost insultingly stupid lyrics get stuck in your head forever, and Pop is basically nothing but hooks.

In essence, I don't care for Pop because it's an almost uniformly shallow genre, abounding with crap lyrics, crap melodies, crap take-your-pick; even when it's good I probably won't like it, and there are few things more annoying than crappy pop songs that you cannot escape. At least with say... wretchedly awful deathcore (pretty much all of it) the one bright side is that you're unlikely to ever have to sit through it against your will, unless you have crappy friends or government agents are torturing you for some reason - Pop is everywhere though, you have to really work to not hear it.
Things like Fall Out Boy and Panic at the Disco, and really even Paramore also count as pop, but it's really hard to draw the line. When I say/think of "pop", at least in modern terms, I think of simple, catchy (hopefully), electronic stuff. That's a pretty shallow definition of pop, because it doesn't have to be electronic or even simple. It can work in other genres. And there's a lot of indie pop stuff that's much better than what's normally on the radio. I wasn't necessarily referring to only the radio stuff, I was curious about people who actually hated all conceivable forms of pop (some metalheads and classical music junkies), but mostly people just wanna talk about the radio stuff, which I suppose is what enters most people's minds when they hear the word "pop".

As for deathcore, I enjoy Suicide Silence and Veil of Maya, and that's about it.
 

KalosCast

New member
Dec 11, 2010
470
0
0
I just don't like it because it all sounds the same to me.

But simply, things that a lot of people listen to, are going to have more people who are both (a) not fans of it and (b) are familiar with it, when compared to things that few people listen to.