Porn and the Art of Rape

Recommended Videos

Clearing the Eye

New member
Jun 6, 2012
1,345
0
0
Gunner_Guardian said:
Clearing the Eye said:
Gunner_Guardian said:
Eamar said:
[small]As for myself, well... despite all my feminist views I'd be lying if I said I'd never been turned on by "rough" porn[/small]
Seems common amongst feminists so some odd reason.


Anyways to answer the OP, not porn isn't inherently sexist. At the end of the day it's 2 people, a man and a woman (or 2 women or whatever), having sex in front of a camera for money. What's inherently sexist about it? This carries the assumption that the act of sex itself is degrading to women which I think is a sexist opinion.
You think it's common for feminists to enjoy rough porn? You're gonna have to give me some explanation here, lol. In so far as I can tell, the majority of feminists are either indifferent to porn or staunchly against it--more the former than the latter.
Perhaps I should have worded it better, a lot of the feminists I've met seem to have a "rape fantasy" or submissive fantasy or whatever. I'm just commenting on a trend I'm noticing. No idea if it's actually true.
Well that's weird. I'd have to assume it's not a broad trend. Would raise a few questions if it was, lol.

Eamar said:
Gunner_Guardian said:
Eamar said:
[small]As for myself, well... despite all my feminist views I'd be lying if I said I'd never been turned on by "rough" porn[/small]
Seems common amongst feminists so some odd reason.
I have no idea if that's true or not, but see my original post for a theory about sexual dominance/submissiveness subverting a person's "day to day" persona.

Clearing the Eye said:
You think it's common for feminists to enjoy rough porn? You're gonna have to give me some explanation here, lol. In so far as I can tell, the majority of feminists are either indifferent to porn or staunchly against it--more the former than the latter.
What about all the feminists who advocate porn as part of sexual empowerment, or who want women not to be ashamed of watching it? The OP refers to the "other side of the schism," as it were, in the 1980s. (As an aside, way more women than most people think watch porn.)
Oh, don't get me wrong, I've looked into and understand that there is an entire section of feminist belief that says women should embrace their sexuality and see it as a form of empowerment. I was simply stating that I find it hard to believe it would be common among feminists to enjoy the idea of being used and abused by a man. It may exist and you've just proven it actually does, but it'd be something of an amazing feat should it be anything less than uncommon.
 

Clearing the Eye

New member
Jun 6, 2012
1,345
0
0
Geo Da Sponge said:
Clearing the Eye said:
Geo Da Sponge said:
Well what would you rather they called it? A 'surprise sex' fantasy?
God I hate that term.

They should call it what it is--rough sex. It's impossible to want to be raped, because the very definition and spirit of the word are in direct contrast to one's will. Wanting to be roughed up, pushed around or otherwise "used," isn't rape and it's a disservice to real victims and the word to use it.
Ehh, I can see your point and I pretty much agree with it, but I'd rather not push it further. This looks like one of those subjects were any debate eventually breaks down into just trying to convince the other person to accept your defintion of a phrase.
Good idea. A phrase really isn't worth any heat.
 

zidine100

New member
Mar 19, 2009
1,016
0
0
Theres so many types of porn, that you really have to go threw them one by one.

Anyway i just have to say, im not talking about what would be classed as 'extreme', im not talking about her definition of extreme here.

But i must point out if what she says is true its sexist to both men and women, and not just women as she points out. If what she says is true and all porn shows women being submissive liking pain and humiliation, that would also say that all porn shows portrays men are big huge burly monsters that want to dominate every woman they sleep with, cause pain and humiliate them on every conceivable level.

Tell me whats the more offensive image here?
 

Clearing the Eye

New member
Jun 6, 2012
1,345
0
0
willer357 said:
What about gay porn then? I don't suppose that men having sex with other men for the enjoyment of men in a video created by men is objectifying women, but I could be wrong.

Oh no, wait, that's obviously just an example of men trying to keep women out of society at large and hold them down by not even acknowledging their existence, right?
It's funny that you say that jokingly, but I'm not certain such a belief isn't held by at least a small fraction of crazies out there, lol.
 

Clearing the Eye

New member
Jun 6, 2012
1,345
0
0
zidine100 said:
Theres so many types of porn, that you really have to go threw them one by one.

Anyway i just have to say, im not talking about what would be classed as 'extreme', im not talking about her definition of extreme here.

But i must point out if what she says is true its sexist to both men and women, and not just women as she points out. If what she says is true and all porn shows women being submissive liking pain and humiliation, id say that all porn shows portrays men are big huge burly monsters that want to dominate every woman they sleep with, cause pain and humiliate them on every conceivable level.

Tell me whats the more offensive image here?
Well, men are thick, brutish thugs that do enjoy humiliating and dominating women, so it's hardly sexist to tell the truth.

[small][small]I kid, I kid![/small][/small]

There is actually more truth to your idea there than a lot of people would think.
 

Clearing the Eye

New member
Jun 6, 2012
1,345
0
0
kingpocky said:
Thomas Guy said:
Yes it's sexist. Women get paid normally double what a man does.
That's called supply and demand
I'm pretty sure even straight women enjoy the female aspect of pornography more than the male. Gay men are really the only demographic of porn consumers who don't wanna see women, lol.
 

Dastardly

Imaginary Friend
Apr 19, 2010
2,420
0
0
Eamar said:
As a feminist who watches porn, I'd be pretty hypocritical if I believed porn was, in and of itself, sexist. I'm sure arguments could be made that some porn is sexist, but personally so long as everyone involved has given informed consent I couldn't care less what they get up to.

Sexual fantasy is a strange, strange thing. You do have to bear in mind that the "violent" porn several have mentioned is not watched exclusively by men... Rape is one of the most common female sex fantasies (**DISCLAIMER** I am not in any way saying that women actually want to be raped or that rape is ever acceptable. The fantasy rape I'm referring to bears little resemblance to the real thing, and since the women involved are fantasising about it the sex they're imagining isn't really "rape" at all **/DISCLAIMER**) It's an extension of general submissiveness in sex, which is something that appeals to a lot of people, many of whom you'd never expect it from (I've heard that people who are sexually submissive are often pretty dominant in day to day life).

So yeah, porn is designed to fulfil fantasies. Some of these fantasies may seem unsavoury to people who do not share them, but that doesn't make them wrong. Just so long as everything is consensual. Can't emphasise that enough.

[small]As for myself, well... despite all my feminist views I'd be lying if I said I'd never been turned on by "rough" porn[/small]
Gotta say, very thoughtful and insightful post on the matter. Just had to respond.

What do you feel are the origins of the phenomenon of the "female rape fantasy?" Some might argue there's a natural component (as in many species, males are dominant -- even forceful -- during mating), while others might argue that it's a result of some of the 'social programming' we've put women through in our culture.

You suggest that it's a subversion of one's everyday personality -- kind of "breaking out of your normal role." This leans more on the idea that the fantasy is socially influenced. To me, that means the door is wide open for the self-fulfilling prophecy to take root.

A woman is expected, by (the darker side of) Society, to not be a sex-seeking creature. But she should, of course, remain sex-serving. This is ingrained in her from an early age. (Make no mistake, Disney sells sex. It's just fully clothed and more colorful.) As a woman naturally discovers her own sexuality, perhaps feeling a bit of socially-induced shame (even subconsciously), the "rape fantasy" provides an outlet. She can indulge that side of her desires while not having to view herself as initiating.

Over time, she also learns (through even casual exposure to porn) that men like certain things -- submissive women, being "conquerors," etc. -- so she might feel that these avenues are her best shot of "scratching that itch" for herself. (It's no big secret that, as empathetic creatures, our desires are at least partially shaped by what we believe the other party's reaction will be.)

All this is to say, is it possible that some of these fantasies, while not necessarily destructive in and of themselves, are an outgrowth of the negative social pressures of the system?
 

kingpocky

New member
Jan 21, 2009
169
0
0
Clearing the Eye said:
kingpocky said:
Thomas Guy said:
Yes it's sexist. Women get paid normally double what a man does.
That's called supply and demand
I'm pretty sure even straight women enjoy the female aspect of pornography more than the male. Gay men are really the only demographic of porn consumers who don't wanna see women, lol.
Someone told me once that most gay pornstars self-identify as straight, and are only in the business because they make ten times as much as they would in straight porn.
 

Eamar

Elite Member
Feb 22, 2012
1,320
5
43
Country
UK
Gender
Female
Clearing the Eye said:
willer357 said:
What about gay porn then? I don't suppose that men having sex with other men for the enjoyment of men in a video created by men is objectifying women, but I could be wrong.

Oh no, wait, that's obviously just an example of men trying to keep women out of society at large and hold them down by not even acknowledging their existence, right?
It's funny that you say that jokingly, but I'm not certain such a belief isn't held by at least a small fraction of crazies out there, lol.
That honestly wouldn't surprise me. After all, there was the whole "political lesbianism" thing- women (some of whom may have actually been lesbians) denouncing straight relationships and rejecting any woman who pursued one as being anti-women and slaves to the patriarchy. Because "all heterosexual sex is rape," apparently >.<

It saddens me that these are(/were) the people whose standards everyone judges the rest of us by.
 

Clearing the Eye

New member
Jun 6, 2012
1,345
0
0
kingpocky said:
Clearing the Eye said:
kingpocky said:
Thomas Guy said:
Yes it's sexist. Women get paid normally double what a man does.
That's called supply and demand
I'm pretty sure even straight women enjoy the female aspect of pornography more than the male. Gay men are really the only demographic of porn consumers who don't wanna see women, lol.
Someone told me once that most gay pornstars self-identify as straight, and are only in the business because they make ten times as much as they would in straight porn.
I would believe that. never thought about it, but when you do, it actually seems possible.

Eamar said:
Clearing the Eye said:
willer357 said:
What about gay porn then? I don't suppose that men having sex with other men for the enjoyment of men in a video created by men is objectifying women, but I could be wrong.

Oh no, wait, that's obviously just an example of men trying to keep women out of society at large and hold them down by not even acknowledging their existence, right?
It's funny that you say that jokingly, but I'm not certain such a belief isn't held by at least a small fraction of crazies out there, lol.
That honestly wouldn't surprise me. After all, there was the whole "political lesbianism" thing- women (some of whom may have actually been lesbians) denouncing straight relationships and rejecting any woman who pursued one as being anti-women and slaves to the patriarchy. Because "all heterosexual sex is rape," apparently >.<

It saddens me that these are(/were) the people whose standards everyone judges the rest of us by.
I don't think people like that should be allowed to vote... Or at least their votes shouldn't count for us much as yours or mine :p
 

Britisheagle

New member
May 21, 2009
504
0
0
Violent pornography has no place on the internet or the world. Even the banner ads on normal regular porn sites are sometimes unwatchable.

Normal pornogrpahy is harmless. The woman consents, along with the man, and both are paid for their actions on screen.
 

irmasterlol

New member
Apr 11, 2012
178
0
0
I don't know, but I can't get it up anymore unless someone is crying or bleeding. Menstrual blood doesn't count.
 

Clearing the Eye

New member
Jun 6, 2012
1,345
0
0
Britisheagle said:
Violent pornography has no place on the internet or the world. Even the banner ads on normal regular porn sites are sometimes unwatchable.

Normal pornogrpahy is harmless. The woman consents, along with the man, and both are paid for their actions on screen.
To be clear, do you mean actual violence, wherein the offending party causes harm to a non-consenting victim? Or do you just mean rough porn and roleplay? Because I don't really consider the former to be porn any more than I would a snuff film.
 

peruvianskys

New member
Jun 8, 2011
577
0
0
"Pornography" as a general concept is not sexist. However, it's impossible to deny that the vast, vast majority of media produced by the modern porn industry is terribly degrading and violent.

Pornographers are like Republicans; there's nothing inherently evil about them, and I'm sure there are some nice ones out there doing good stuff, but you have to wade through so much shit to find them that it's understandable why you would just write the entire thing off.

If more "good" producers came out and said that they didn't like the violence and slurs and objectification, I would be far more likely to say there was something worth salvaging in today's porn industry. But right now it seems like it's comprised mostly of people either making terribly sexist shit or the people who make only slightly sexist shit with the money that comes from other people's sexist shit. It's 90% trash and the other 10% isn't essential or valuable enough to try and salvage.
 

Terramax

New member
Jan 11, 2008
3,747
0
0
thaluikhain said:
I wouldn't say it was just a one way thing.

Yes, cultural things reflects society, and porn along with it (inter-racial porn was a massive taboo until relatively recently, for example).

However, people are greatly influenced by the culture they have grown up with/live in. Pornography is very important in our culture's relation to sex. Now, to claim that such and such cultural thing directly caused such and such result is an over-simplification, but they can certainly encourage things. Like you say, it can't tell you what to like, but it's not bad at persuading.

For example, nobody says a magazine full of thin girls causes any specific young women who aren't unusually thin to turn to anorexia, but a media that constantly depicts attractive women as thin has led to an increase of body issue problems amongst young women.
This pretty much nails it.

And I'd like to suggest that the answer is education. If we are taught that it is nothing but fantasy, we will treat it as such.
 

Clearing the Eye

New member
Jun 6, 2012
1,345
0
0
peruvianskys said:
"Pornography" as a general concept is not sexist. However, it's impossible to deny that the vast, vast majority of media produced by the modern porn industry is terribly degrading and violent.

Pornographers are like Republicans; there's nothing inherently evil about them, and I'm sure there are some nice ones out there doing good stuff, but you have to wade through so much shit to find them that it's understandable why you would just write the entire thing off.

If more "good" producers came out and said that they didn't like the violence and slurs and objectification, I would be far more likely to say there was something worth salvaging in today's porn industry. But right now it seems like it's comprised mostly of people either making terribly sexist shit or the people who make only slightly sexist shit with the money that comes from other people's sexist shit. It's 90% trash and the other 10% isn't essential or valuable enough to try and salvage.
I wouldn't agree that the majority of porn is violent. Perhaps it's just the sites I know of, but I rarely see any violence and more often than not, the central focus is the woman's body and her "orgasm."