DarklordKyo said:
Dirty Hipsters said:
You should just back out this argument now. You clearly have no idea how the law works and are just basing your argument on emotion rather than fact, whilst simultaneously derailing your own thread.
Ehh, fair enough, still bullcrap though.
I remember this wiretapping case, absolutely disgusting.
If we are talking about the same case, he wasn't recording his tormenters saying embarassing things or anything like that. He was trying to prove that he was being bullied. Maybe it's a different but similar case, but google pops what I thought when I typed 'wiretapping bully'.
What went down was that this special-ed student was being verbually abused and assaulted, but the school did nothing and did not believe him. So the student records himself with an Ipad being bullied in front of the class with the teacher doing absolutely nothing, The school loses its shit and calls the cops, and he gets charged with felony wiretapping.
He might have wanted to get back at the bullies, of course who wouldn't, but most importantly he was trying to save himself and wanted the school to believe him, thinking it would help. In the end, the kid had his charged reduced to disorderly conduct and was found guilty. Why weren't the bullies charged with harassment? Beats me.