I see. I did have this feeling that we were debating from the same side of the fence. When you reiterated the same thing I thought you were... Nevermind -_-malestrithe said:Never said it was about popularity. The purpose of my column is to correct a false perception that MOST anime lovers have. And I do mean most Anime lovers. To a lot of them, at least the ones I bothered to ask, the Anime movement began in North America in 1998. It is not my fault that people have this perception, but they do. The first took offense to my statement and wanted to correct me for simply saying it. You took offense to that and argued something that I was not even think of when I first posted. I'm sorry that I got carried away.XcrossX said:If your going for saturation, I can see that. But Toonami was just a step on the ladder. I'll still say the internet has had a far greater impact on anime... Popularity wise. That's my experience and opinion though. Let's not make this one of those, your opinion is different than mine, therefore inherently wrong arguments though.
Regardless of how you feel and regardless of any corrections you might want to heap upon me, my column is talking directly to people that feel the following about Anime:
1. It began in 1998 with Toonami and Pokemon.
2. Nothing before that time is worth remembering.
3. That pre Toonami stuff was better than what came after.
I get the giant sticking point is me using Toonami and 1998 as the cutoff, but that is for my benefit. It allows me a chance to specialize and focus on the pre 1998 Anime. It will make my writing better and it will give me more time to research what I'm writing about. Also, more people know Toonami and have a perception of it. This whole debate we had proves how divisive a force it is. (and that's the angle I'm taking regardless of Internet. Sorry, but the Internet is beyond the scope of my column)
That is my intent with the column: To highlight pre 1998 anime. If you don't like that, feel free to write your own. I will gladly read it.
Completely agree on your premise then. And I had a classmate years ago *cough* 2001 *cough*, that did a write-up on the (soon to be) explosion of online media and its possible effects on the movie industry. It was just really interesting. Wasn't trying to derail your expose though. Part of the confusion.
Good luck with the article though. Oh... and Gigantor. I read all of the other posts and I didn't see him. So Gigantor. Very relevant. *looks up*
If I could squeeze another sentence into that first paragraph, and fix those fragments. We could call this a story. Oh well.