Heres a fun one. Someone was showing me something on her phone and i got caught with it. So doing the whole i am a good friend thing i remove the battery and give it to the teacher. Apparently thats grounds for suspention.
With the school making it into a big issue they only make certain that the students will be more distracted. Phones ringing in class should be dealt with a quick slap on the wrist (figuratively speaking) before it is forgot, so the teachers can actually get around to do what they are supposed to do, namely teach!ohnoitsabear said:On one hand, there is absolutely no reason why you need your phone in class. There is no benefit to having them in the classroom, and they only serve to distract and annoy the people around the student using the phone (or everyone, if it goes off).
On the other hand, the school has no rights to go through personal information like that. It is a definite violation of privacy, and it needs to be stopped.
Oops! My mistake. I thought it was only the assistant-principal. I suppose either parents or publicity is the way to go then.Mortai Gravesend said:From the first post it seems the principal is the one who started the entire business. I suppose the assistant-principal just helped.
I probably should have rephrased that. I meant like, if you have an extracurricular event or something where you need to call for a ride later on, stuff like that. But yeah, I think in actual emergency, someone would call the school.Orange12345 said:I never really understood the whole "for emergency" excuse. I mean if there was an incident with a family member being hospitalized or the like, they would call the school.Chemical Alia said:Nobody even had cell phones when I was in school. I had one for emergencies by the time I was a junior in high school. My thoughts are, if we could get through the day without using a cell phone in school, so can you kids. If you don't want it confiscated or searched when there is a disciplinary incident, don't bring it in or leave it in your locker/car/whatever.
As for the OP this is unacceptable you should really tell an outside authority about this.
Your best option will be to tell your parents and have all your friends do the same. Regardless of what rules they put in place at the school it does not give them the right to violate actual laws. Which is what they are doing.MaoExE said:I've always been okay with my school being allowed to take phones and such, seeing as it was against the rules. But today that has all changed.
I was sitting in a class, and we hear a phone go off. No one confesses to it, so the principal decides to take EVERYONE'S phone in the class. Not only did they take our phone, but they go through your messages, your Facebook and anything else they feel like doing. It just doesn't seem right, and there has to be SOME other way to avoid what they do now.
So I ask you Escapist, how do you feel about school privacy?
EDIT: They can get pass our passwords which is what brought this whole incident up.
[joking]Ah yes, I fully agree that a teacher who confiscates an ipod because somehow someone might call it is someone that I would not call developed enough to make 100% intelligent decisions. [/joking]erttheking said:It depends, on one hand privacy is important, on the other hand high schools are filled with people at the point in their lives where most of them have not developed enough to make intelligent decisions 100% of the time but have the strength and capability to do some damage. Depends on the situation.
Actually, punishing a group for the actions of one is a pretty often used re-training method. The idea behind it being the individual's rely on the support of the rest of the group to get through whatever is going on. By punishing the whole group, that individual must decide between risking being alienated from the group or having a little moral fortitude and owning up to the wrong doing.henkalv said:furthermore, punishing an entire group for the action of one individual is just plain idiotic as well. Credit should be given where due.
Divide and Conquer my friend, Divide and Conquer.Fatboy_41 said:Actually, punishing a group for the actions of one is a pretty often used re-training method. The idea behind it being the individual's rely on the support of the rest of the group to get through whatever is going on. By punishing the whole group, that individual must decide between risking being alienated from the group or having a little moral fortitude and owning up to the wrong doing.henkalv said:furthermore, punishing an entire group for the action of one individual is just plain idiotic as well. Credit should be given where due.
Yeah, there is no way to simply 'get past' phone passwords... unless you're all using 0000 as your code. This would need a really really computer literate technician to pull off, (if it is indeed possible) and from my experience of teachers, well, let's just say Mircosoft Word may as well be the enigma machine.Kendarik said:Unless you use the school's wi-fi connection for your data transfer this should be impossible with a password in place. If they are hacking your password then in many places they are committing a criminal offense (and are more technically inclined than any teachers I know)...
I'm starting to smell something unpleasant in this story.
Well most kids probably do use their wifi, but their proof on if you did it is based on if any of your messages match the time on it.Kendarik said:Unless you use the school's wi-fi connection for your data transfer this should be impossible with a password in place. If they are hacking your password then in many places they are committing a criminal offense (and are more technically inclined than any teachers I know).MaoExE said:No idea, and that's what bugs me the most. I have no idea how, but they can. Because they'll tell you exactly when you sent/recieved a message. With a password, or without a password.Kendarik said:And how exactly do they get past the password on your phone?MaoExE said:I should have added that they get past the password on your phone.Kendarik said:I feel you are pretty stupid to not have a password on your phone.MaoExE said:So I ask you Escapist, how do you feel about school privacy?
I also feel its pretty stupid to bring your phone to school if its not allowed.
I'm having a difficult time believing this.
Well most kids probably do use their wifi, but their proof on if you did it is based on if any of your messages match the time on it.
I'm having trouble believing this too. A single phone goes off in one class and its a matter for the two senior administrators of the school?manic_depressive13 said:Oops! My mistake. I thought it was only the assistant-principal. I suppose either parents or publicity is the way to go then.Mortai Gravesend said:From the first post it seems the principal is the one who started the entire business. I suppose the assistant-principal just helped.
I'm starting to smell something unpleasant in this story.
**blinks**MaoExE said:One guy in my class, chose to have the guts to do this. He said, "I don't have my phone so it wasn't me." And the assistant-principal made him empty all his pockets, and picked up his back-pack searched through it, and took his IPod.