And yet nobody has any hard proof of that, not even the person's family, who, by the way, wants everyone to stop politicizing his death.I didn't make the claim, the police did.
And yet nobody has any hard proof of that, not even the person's family, who, by the way, wants everyone to stop politicizing his death.I didn't make the claim, the police did.
Man, your understanding of 'hard proof' is really... just not connected to realityAnd yet nobody has any hard proof of that, not even the person's family, who, by the way, wants everyone to stop politicizing his death.
I've read the articles. The only evidence that the officer who died was the officer who was hit by the extinguisher is unnamed LEO sources.Man, your understanding of 'hard proof' is really... just not connected to reality
Yet your first article did just that.And yet nobody has any hard proof of that, not even the person's family, who, by the way, wants everyone to stop politicizing his death.
Apart from what the police said.So still no hard proof, nothing has changed. The officer didn't report the alleged wounds to the family, only pepper spray, and still died of a blood clot. There is no evidence to suggest trauma was the cause of his death
And it was investigated.The death of Officer Sicknick will be investigated by the Metropolitan Police Department’s Homicide Branch, the USCP, and our federal partners. "
They knew about the clot when he was put on the ventilator before his death. That was not the result of the investigation, which one assumes is still ongoing.And it was investigated.
And they said it was a blood clot.
Eh, what happened to calling it road rage? That was popular for a bit.Ahh, so we're going into full "she died because her heart stopped beating, the car hitting her had nothing to do with it" territory then?
Given the contexts of posts #62 and #63 that your comment was directly following on from, that claim is obviously dishonest.Well I think you need to go back and notice Kwak was referencing the Christ Church shooter and his actions to support his argument.
White supremacist recruitment guides online specifically recommend concealing their real affiliations during intitial contact because awareness of such beliefs makes people wary. Instead using milder conservative talking points to form a connection, generate trust and sympathy, before attempting to draw them into the real stuff.Also how does fetishizing them as some kind of dangerous fringe group warranting special coverage of basically anything they do help stop them again?
It's how ISIS was able to recruit by spinning press against them to show themselves as some dangerous rebels and how some I.S. brides were pulled into it too.
What do you think happens when you hit someone?The attack could cause elevated stress and heart rate, which could make a blood clot more likely to kill, and therefore, so would exercise, but I don't think you can punch a blood clot into someone, though I'll defer to the medical experts on that one.
Sure, it could be.What do you think happens when you hit someone?
This causes damage. Damage ruptures blood vessels: a bruise, for instance, is caused by blood leaking out of blood vessels into the surrounding tissue. This causes clotting processes to go into effect to create a "haemostatic plug" - to temporarily fill the rupture in the blood vessel and prevent further blood loss until full repair can occur. In other words, you pretty much cannot avoid causing blood clots when you punch someone. Punch them in the head, and it's likely to cause damage to blood vessels in the brain itself.
The thing is that the blood clots are not usually fatal, because they are very small, or in peripheral tissues and do not get to somewhere really important like the brain. But sometimes they do, and sometimes they are sufficiently serious they kill someone.
So if the result of a deliberate assault, this is murder.
Unfortunately their follow up attempt to make dabbing a white supremacist symbol didn't stick as well. Or the chart of American Sign Language with every letter being a hate symbol.It doesn't really matter what the origin of the "ok symbol is a white supremacist sign" came from. Even if it started wotj just 4chan trolling, if the symbol got adopted by actual white supremacists and is actively being used by them then it's a white supremacist symbol when used by them, regardless of the origin.
Realistically, he'll almost definitely get away with a self defense argument for the first shooting, maybe one of the others, but not the rest.only to end up shooting a few guys in "self defence",
That's the one that started his spree with "Subscribe to PweDiePie" thus verifying that PewDiePie supports spree killing Muslims and claims he was radicalized by Candace Owens (but that "the extreme actions she calls for are too much, even for my tastes"), that Spyro the Dragon 3 taught him ethno-nationalism, that Fortnite trained him to be a killer, and who decided to "contact the reborn Knights Templar for a blessing in support of the attack", right?Yeah, that's what the christchurch mass-murderer was signalling.
Seen people pull that with the guy who was burned to death in a pawnshop two days in during the Minneapolis George Floyd protests, with things like "just because they found his body in the remains of the building, he died from smoke inhalation and burns, and there's video of a protester pouring what appears to be accelerant in the building and watching it burn" somehow not suggesting he had anything to do with it.Ahh, so we're going into full "she died because her heart stopped beating, the car hitting her had nothing to do with it" territory then?
I was talking about your claim of ‘died by paperwork’I've read the articles. The only evidence that the officer who died was the officer who was hit by the extinguisher is unnamed LEO sources.
Not his family.
Not himself.
Not official named sources.
So no, not hard proof.
Your attempt at gaslighting has failed.
Then you are confused.I was talking about your claim of ‘died by paperwork’
Then you are confused.
Do you have any evidence this was true?Or he was sitting down for too long doing paperwork and developed a blood clot? An autopsy would need to be done to determine if the clot was due to trauma or any other reason.
Nope. Does anyone have any proof that the blood clot was due to his injuries?Do you have any evidence this was true?
YesNope. Does anyone have any proof that the blood clot was due to his injuries?