oh yes i compleatly agree, what i meant with legislation is the like of tolerance and management zones, they are a very effective method at the moment, if not currently implemented badly, but i wasn't talking about legislation in regards to sex slavery, i think the law at the moment covers that quite well, i was just talking common prostituesVerlander said:To an extent maybe, but the studies in Amsterdam ahve proven that sexual slavery and pimping don't stop, regardless of the law. In fact, in certain case, it was made worse, as pimps tried to compete with the legalised brothelsjamiedf said:actually it would be very easy to legislative, but its an unwillingness, no political party wants to touch the subject, atleast not possibility of legitimising it, its why so many tolerance and management zones proposals are turned downVerlander said:Sex slavery=bad
Sex working=fine, potentially liberating
Unfortunately, it's hard to legislate, so it's generally banned on grounds of safety etc. Which doesn't necessarily work
Yeah, I agree, and would back it wholeheartedlyjamiedf said:oh yes i compleatly agree, what i meant with legislation is the like of tolerance and management zones, they are a very effective method at the moment, if not currently implemented badly, but i wasn't talking about legislation in regards to sex slavery, i think the law at the moment covers that quite well, i was just talking common prostituesVerlander said:To an extent maybe, but the studies in Amsterdam ahve proven that sexual slavery and pimping don't stop, regardless of the law. In fact, in certain case, it was made worse, as pimps tried to compete with the legalised brothelsjamiedf said:actually it would be very easy to legislative, but its an unwillingness, no political party wants to touch the subject, atleast not possibility of legitimising it, its why so many tolerance and management zones proposals are turned downVerlander said:Sex slavery=bad
Sex working=fine, potentially liberating
Unfortunately, it's hard to legislate, so it's generally banned on grounds of safety etc. Which doesn't necessarily work
Yeah, I agree, and would back it wholeheartedlyjamiedf said:oh yes i compleatly agree, what i meant with legislation is the like of tolerance and management zones, they are a very effective method at the moment, if not currently implemented badly, but i wasn't talking about legislation in regards to sex slavery, i think the law at the moment covers that quite well, i was just talking common prostituesVerlander said:To an extent maybe, but the studies in Amsterdam ahve proven that sexual slavery and pimping don't stop, regardless of the law. In fact, in certain case, it was made worse, as pimps tried to compete with the legalised brothelsjamiedf said:actually it would be very easy to legislative, but its an unwillingness, no political party wants to touch the subject, atleast not possibility of legitimising it, its why so many tolerance and management zones proposals are turned downVerlander said:Sex slavery=bad
Sex working=fine, potentially liberating
Unfortunately, it's hard to legislate, so it's generally banned on grounds of safety etc. Which doesn't necessarily work
see now yours is an attitude i like, but according to opinion poles and social studies, that attitude is in the minority, that's why they remain criminalised, but from the 60 something posts here there's only been one against it, so that makes me question these studies (my entie reason for starting this thread)Verlander said:Yeah, I agree, and would back it wholeheartedlyjamiedf said:oh yes i compleatly agree, what i meant with legislation is the like of tolerance and management zones, they are a very effective method at the moment, if not currently implemented badly, but i wasn't talking about legislation in regards to sex slavery, i think the law at the moment covers that quite well, i was just talking common prostituesVerlander said:To an extent maybe, but the studies in Amsterdam ahve proven that sexual slavery and pimping don't stop, regardless of the law. In fact, in certain case, it was made worse, as pimps tried to compete with the legalised brothelsjamiedf said:actually it would be very easy to legislative, but its an unwillingness, no political party wants to touch the subject, atleast not possibility of legitimising it, its why so many tolerance and management zones proposals are turned downVerlander said:Sex slavery=bad
Sex working=fine, potentially liberating
Unfortunately, it's hard to legislate, so it's generally banned on grounds of safety etc. Which doesn't necessarily work
This. As long as they get check ups or tell their clients beforehand that they may be at risk for something it should be legal. It is their right to do what they want if it doesn't endanger others. I've had the question before and I stick by my suggestion that a brothel would be a perfectly legal institution that should be allowed to exist as long as they pay taxes. Maybe even government owned brothels. Who would it hurt if they did this?darth.pixie said:If it's a personal choice, not forced, it's fine. It should be legitimized as a business mostly because that way, they can get health check ups without lying and get them more often.
It's one of the oldest jobs in the world and let's be honest, sometimes they're more available.
It is because the main age group on here is 17-24. We are a lot more opened minded than older people.jamiedf said:see now yours is an attitude i like, but according to opinion poles and social studies, that attitude is in the minority, that's why they remain criminalised, but from the 60 something posts here there's only been one against it, so that makes me question these studies (my entie reason for starting this thread)Verlander said:Yeah, I agree, and would back it wholeheartedlyjamiedf said:oh yes i compleatly agree, what i meant with legislation is the like of tolerance and management zones, they are a very effective method at the moment, if not currently implemented badly, but i wasn't talking about legislation in regards to sex slavery, i think the law at the moment covers that quite well, i was just talking common prostituesVerlander said:To an extent maybe, but the studies in Amsterdam ahve proven that sexual slavery and pimping don't stop, regardless of the law. In fact, in certain case, it was made worse, as pimps tried to compete with the legalised brothelsjamiedf said:actually it would be very easy to legislative, but its an unwillingness, no political party wants to touch the subject, atleast not possibility of legitimising it, its why so many tolerance and management zones proposals are turned downVerlander said:Sex slavery=bad
Sex working=fine, potentially liberating
Unfortunately, it's hard to legislate, so it's generally banned on grounds of safety etc. Which doesn't necessarily work
not illegal in the uk to get paid for sex, its illegal to advertise, solicited, kerb crawl and beckoningKlepa said:I think it's funny how getting paid for sex is illegal, unless you do it on film.
Not the case in my country though, prostitutes are alright, pimps not so much.