Uh, why would you link to buzzfeed. that website is a horrible leech with no original content.
Secondly, seriuosly are "weight loss pills" really a thing? i mean, a legal thing? Just how much you have to be unable to control yourself to need such pills to starve? Why would you want to starve to begin with? Not that either of the ads in that link show a starving person. The girl does not look anorexic (though its pretty thin) and the guy clearly has to eat a lot to keep that muscle mass alive or it would atrophy.
It's getting backlash from feminists saying they're treating the female body as a commodity, and it's getting backlash from body positivity campaigners for essentially being an ad campaign which weaponizes fat shaming.
Is it? Where? Because the backlash i saw in that article you linked was that of vandalism and not feminism. Besides, what does equality among sexes has to do with the so called "Fat shaming" to begin with?
She then says "Because adverts like yours add to the external voices telling young girls they're not good enough as they are," and they reply with "and it's ok to be fat and out of shape instead of healthy? We are a nation of sympathizers for fatties." Remember, this isn't a hacked account, this is actually how their social media people are responding to this. Even the CEO of the company said regarding Juliette, "it sounds like Juliette had a lot of issues well before she saw the PW ad," completely missing the point of her response.
While the response was admittedly rudely handled, it is not wrong. Being fat is unhealthy and thus objectively bad for anyone that considers "living" a good thing. The CEOs response was also correct - you yourself pointed out Juliettes problems in the paragraph before.
Protein World is supposed to be a place for people who want to improve their health. It seems to me they shouldn't be hating on the unhealthy. To me, their ad campaign isn't encouraging, it's anti-exercise. To me, it says if my body doesn't look like that, I shouldn't be on the beach. When I feel that way, I don't want to get out and do what's best for me, I just want to stay in and hide my shameful body. It's judgement like what Protein World is dishing out which makes me stay inside and not run in the light.
I dont know what Protein World is supposed to be other than a product depicted in those ads. I never heard of them beforehand. They do not hate on unhealthy, the worst thing you managed to show is them pointing out that being unhealthy is indeed unhealthy. The campaign is definatelly not anti-exercise - just look at how ripped the guy is. that takes A LOT of exercising. and the female one isnt bad in muscle tones either (muscle tones work different on females, they dont bulge as much as for males - different hormones do that).
Twintix said:
OK, listen here people, "tough love" is not an excuse to act like a right dick.
Look, guys, encouraging healthy lifestyles is one thing, but it is not achieved by bullying fat people or dismissing those who work really hard trying to lose weight.
Good thing those ads werent doing that then, right?
Also what is a "right dick", is there a "left dick"? what kind of animal is that?
Lilani said:
I'm just asking to not be treated like shit for not being thin. Or at least for it to be acknowledged that treating fat people like shit does the exact opposite of motivating them to no longer be fat.
You're not.
KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:
Hell until the 19th century and even then, being pudgy, or out right fat was the standard for attractiveness. It meant you were wealthy and ate well, in some places it still is the standard for beauty.
No, it was a standard for wealthy. Being fat meant you were wealthy enough to overeat. Fat people were "Desired" not because they were attractive, but because they were wealthy. When it came outside of the wealthy circles think still were king. We are hardwired by evolution to find healthy attractive, because it allows easier transfer for genes (higher chance of children surviving). Evolution is slow and does not change fast enough for our civilization to affect it. Especially not when we dont have the majority of the "other side" children dying out so evolution does not need to do selection of genes.
The reason wealthy people were fat back then is the same reason Brittish wealthy people have posh accents - they were looking for an easy identifiable way to differentiate from the common worker so you could look at him and know "Hes royalty". It has nothing to do with attractiveness.
KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:
Not everyone who is fat did it to them selves. Some people have glandular issues that actually make it difficult in the extreme to maintain a healthy weight of any kind. For some with the glandular issues it's out right impossible. People with depression also often eat, just because it makes them feel better. They often can't help being overweight if not outright morbidly obese, because their coping mechanism is food. Some others have inherited habits of awful diets from the way they grew up, and that's hard as hell to change. Finally some people are in situations where healthy food is simply not an option due to an inability to cook, lacking equipment to cook decent food with, or just can't afford it. So check your judgemental attitude there.
Glandular issues exist, but are so rare they would not be responsible for even 1% of people classified as overweight or above.
Depression Does have an effect, but once again people who have legitimate chemical inbalance depression is rare and in no way could account for "60% of US citizens being overweight".
The other situations you describe are the case of "Doing it to themselves" whether out of habit or out of lack of food preparation skill. Ive had a discussion couple years back regarding affordance and the end result were that you can eat healthy for as much as an average overweight person spends on food. eating healthy is not equivalent to buying prepared fruit baskets all the time you know.
Queen Michael said:
I'm so freakin' fed up wiht this. Why does so many health campaigns have to imply that fat people are ugly? Sure, being fat is unhealthy, but that's my point. They could focus on the health benefits, but instead they have to make it about looks.
Well its a good thing that this campaign did not do it then?
Queen Michael said:
Okay, but that doesn't really change things. They're still bringing looks into a discussion that should be about health.
A company that sells products meant to get people thin has a thin person in their advertisement? OH THE HORROR!
Queen Michael said:
Sure, pics of good-looking people sell more products than pics of ugly people, and yes, many consumers feel that slim people look better than fat people. But that doesn't make it well-mannered to imply that if you're slim or not determines whether you're "beach body ready."
"Beach body" is a term that is refereed to people who work on their bodies to be more slim for summertime. it is the term to imply if you are slim or not. thats the sole purpose of the term. it has nothing to do with the actual beach.