My goodness. Well I hope someone cures your condition then.archvile93 said:I'll consider it (TF2) when it stops boring the shit out of me.
All traces of realism went from the game when i discovered the model 1887 and the rangers in multiplayerTharwen said:...and there are people who claim Modern Warfare 2 is realistic...
You'll have to get used to it I'm afraid.OtakuNinja said:How many "MW2 complaint" treads must i wade through to find something at least slightly original, please escapist just move on and find something else to talk about
This wasn't meant to be a *****, although it may have looked like it. Honestly did wonder what other people thought of it.Vianyte said:You'll have to get used to it I'm afraid.OtakuNinja said:How many "MW2 complaint" treads must i wade through to find something at least slightly original, please escapist just move on and find something else to talk about
If you were on the forums last year, people would be bitching about Halo. This year, it's MW2. When another really popular multiplayer game comes out, there will be at least 3 threads a week of people bitching about it.
That might work on a console FPS like Halo but believe me, having perfect accuracy hip shooting a sniper rifle would be HORRIBLE on MW2 (especially on the PC).Godavari said:I think the need to quickscope is retarded. The tactic itself is just getting around a wholly unrealistic interpretation of how a sniper rifle fires. I prefer the Halo approach, where the thing is amazingly accurate even when unscoped (which can actually be pretty damn hard to aim). CoD, on the other hand, thinks that if you're not looking through the scope that your sniper rifle should shoot at a 45-degree angle from the barrlel.