Rate the person's username

Recommended Videos

Asturiel

the God of Pants
Nov 24, 2009
3,940
0
0
Sounds like "Bolonium" to me. The silliest of the elements. Therefor it is great.

8/10
 

Random Argument Man

New member
May 21, 2008
6,011
0
0
SUPER MEGA RANDOM ARGUMENT:

Mcgroober is kickass
Kickass deserves a 9/10
Therefore, Mcgroober has a 9/10

Asturiel said:
The system is DESIGNED to be broken!

You dislike my name that much?

1/1
I love it, but you broke my system! I must give you a penalty.
 

Asturiel

the God of Pants
Nov 24, 2009
3,940
0
0
@R.A.M.: In that case I'll continue to break it.

Interesting. It's nice, capitalized, but I don't know what it's from.

So 7.5/10
 

Steppin Razor

New member
Dec 15, 2009
6,868
0
0
10/13
It's alright.


While he is a bloody ninja, Asturiel is a damned good name. Just to keep the broken rating system intact, I shall score you thusly:

Letter Count Not too long, not too short, but just right: 300 Escapists/12 bears
Aesthetics It lookes damned nice if I may say so myself: 12 Commies/5 Zero Punctuation fans
Saying It Out Loud Say it slowly, As - tu - riel. It sounds nice, doesn't it? For that: 55 Pokemon/33 Fridges

Final Score: drum roll please. 16 rabid anime fans/4-Chan
 

Steppin Razor

New member
Dec 15, 2009
6,868
0
0
13/13

Originality sucks and no longer exists. Everything you think of, someone has already thought up a better version.
 

Asturiel

the God of Pants
Nov 24, 2009
3,940
0
0
To the unagi, I like it.

15.8/20

To the proper person who should have been Alpha your name is coolio, and the numbers are getting less annoying as I see you.

4/5
 

Cherry Cola

Your daddy, your Rock'n'Rolla
Jun 26, 2009
11,940
0
0
I never really get the impression that you have random arguments. I've seen you have arguments, but not random arguments where you just argue something completely besides the point without anyone else mentioning the subject you are arguing.

So your name is currently misleading.

7/10
 

Random Argument Man

New member
May 21, 2008
6,011
0
0
Ha! 10/10


Hubilub said:
I never really get the impression that you have random arguments. I've seen you have arguments, but not random arguments where you just argue something completely besides the point without anyone else mentioning the subject you are arguing.

So your name is currently misleading.

7/10
In this letter, I would like to share with you some thoughts I originally organized to draw an accurate portrait of Mr. Hulibub's ideological alignment. First, the misinformation: Hulibub suggests that all major world powers are controlled by a covert group of "insiders". Where the heck did he come up with that? I confess that I don't know the answer to that question. I do know, however, that while Hulibub and other petulant nabobs of sectarianism sometimes differ on the details and scale of their upcoming campaigns of terror they never fail to agree on the basic principle and substance. Hence, it is imperative that you understand that he insists that his utterances enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness. Sorry, Hulibub, but, with apologies to Gershwin, "it ain't necessarily so." He thinks that the world is crying out to labor beneath his firm but benevolent heel. However, I am astonished by how little integrity and good judgment he possesses.

Faith is harder to shake than knowledge, love succumbs less to change than respect, hate is more enduring than aversion, and Hulibub would not hesitate to get everyone to march in lockstep with his malicious votaries if he felt he could benefit from doing so. You shouldn't let him intimidate you. You shouldn't let him push you around. We're the ones who are right, not Hulibub. The moral of the story: Whenever I ask Mr. Hulibub for proof of his claim that all literature that opposes classism was forged by wishy-washy roustabouts, he runs and hides.