That gave me a migraine.felltablet said:Here is an amusing example of one of English's most atrocious sentences:
http://buffaloremix.ytmnd.com/
I fully agree with you're points.Nigh Invulnerable said:Something that annoys the hell out of me is people not knowing how to use 'their' 'they're' and 'there' properly. They're eating their dinner over there. So many people use there instead of they're and it drives me crazy. Too many people also have trouble with 'you're' and 'your'. Every time I read these misuses I want to punch my monitor, but then I don't because it would be expensive and painful.
Your just being mean theirfedpayne said:I fully agree with you're points.Nigh Invulnerable said:Something that annoys the hell out of me is people not knowing how to use 'their' 'they're' and 'there' properly. They're eating their dinner over there. So many people use there instead of they're and it drives me crazy. Too many people also have trouble with 'you're' and 'your'. Every time I read these misuses I want to punch my monitor, but then I don't because it would be expensive and painful.
And may I suggest getting a monitor lizard to punch for whenever you get aggravated?
Nasty! Once, in Britain, when I was rather tipsy (borderline drunk, but I'd like to deny it) someone made me say "The sick sixth sheik's sixth sick sheep's sick."Graustein said:Chad and Shad both sat an English test. One of the questions was regarding the usage of "had" versus "had had". Chad, where Shad had had "had", had had "had had". "Had had" had had the approval of the teacher.
It's grammatically correct, as far as I know. Now try saying it out loud, without the benefit of quotation marks.
Ugh, I even felt annoyed as I wrote it.Wicky_42 said:Your just being mean theirfedpayne said:I fully agree with you're points.Nigh Invulnerable said:Something that annoys the hell out of me is people not knowing how to use 'their' 'they're' and 'there' properly. They're eating their dinner over there. So many people use there instead of they're and it drives me crazy. Too many people also have trouble with 'you're' and 'your'. Every time I read these misuses I want to punch my monitor, but then I don't because it would be expensive and painful.
And may I suggest getting a monitor lizard to punch for whenever you get aggravated?![]()
already postedfelltablet said:Here is an amusing example of one of English's most atrocious sentences:
http://buffaloremix.ytmnd.com/
yes it's true that english assimilates a lot of words, however it's one of the most difficult languages to learn in the world due to the complexity of it's grammar and also the amount of words in itHowever, I believe English is a simple language; it just has the habit of assimilating everything it comes into contact with. Therefore, you end up with an overly large vocabulary and several ridiculous instances where nothing can be put to "rule". BUT, these exceptions are not needed to be competent in speaking the language.
Hmmmm...that too may become expensive and painful. Perhaps I shall have to content myself with punching a bag of marshmallows instead. Stress relief plus sugary sweet pillows!fedpayne said:I fully agree with you're points.Nigh Invulnerable said:Something that annoys the hell out of me is people not knowing how to use 'their' 'they're' and 'there' properly. They're eating their dinner over there. So many people use there instead of they're and it drives me crazy. Too many people also have trouble with 'you're' and 'your'. Every time I read these misuses I want to punch my monitor, but then I don't because it would be expensive and painful.
And may I suggest getting a monitor lizard to punch for whenever you get aggravated?
Yup and im still amazed of everyone who really can include this into words. I managed some of them seperatly , but some zulus tried to teach me a song, i failed so utterly.GloatingSwine said:"clicking" is a phoneme, not a language.Flap Jack452 said:what about that crazy clicking language that people speak in the jungles?
A phoneme is a unit of spoken language structure. We are essentially born with all of them built in and "forget" the ones that aren't used around us. Learning a new phoneme is a monumentally difficult thing to do.
Not to mention we spell things entirely differently depending on where you're from, which for foreigners learning it can prove annoying and difficult I'd imagine!Cadren said:There are a bunch of reason that English is hard to understand.
Mainly, English spelling makes no sense at all.
Seriously, have you ever thought for a while about the concept of silent letters? Letters are supposed to represent sounds, but some of them represent nothing. If that's the case, why have them at all?
Or could you ever imagine having to teach how to read 'ough' to somebody and making sense of it? Dough, rough, through, cough, bough... none of them sound anything a like.