Neofag was a comedy gold mine, it was nice to put faces to the simping cornballs who run around Neogaf shitting up any thread regarding political, gender, and race matters like they have life all figured out.
"Harm" is a difficult thing to measure. If a fat person got on that subreddit, I imagine that would be pretty not-fun for them. If they were of the sort of disposition, they could do something drastic in response. Highly unlikely, sure, and by no means should reddit coddle sensitive people, but I'm just pointing out that it "not causing anyone harm" is probably not true. Words hurt. That's a fact of life.spartenX said:arbitrary considering that it was banned for violating this rule "Keep Everyone Safe: You agree to not intentionally jeopardize the health and safety of others or yourself." despite the fact that there has been no actual reports of that sub (either individual posters, or as a whole) violating said rule or even harassing anyone, while other subs like r/shitredditsays have been known to actually go out of there way to brigade other subs, send threats, and even directly get people fired.Kolby Jack said:I'm not the sort of guy who would refer to basic human decency as an "arbitrary reason" and it's mildly worrying that you apparently are.spartenX said:who cares if its not government induced censorship? the fact is that they decided to ban a subreddit that was not actually harming anyone, for arbitrary reasons. that is still censorship, and it is still a problem, especially on a site that allows other subreddits that actually do directly harass people.BloatedGuppy said:The degree to which this is "censorship" is irrelevant, because we're basically picking nits about where it falls on a completely meaningless scale. It's not government induced censorship. No one's rights are being violated. There is no dangerous chilling effect on the populace's right to dissent. It's the owner of a private website exercising their right to modify their TOU. It happens every day. It's an utter non-event, and should be treated as such.spartenX said:so the reason that saying that freedom of speech is alarmist in this situation, where a subreddit that mainly keeps its stuff to its subreddit and does everything it can to ensure that there is no harassment done to the people it mocks and that it doesn't brigade any other subs and is clearly labeled so you what to expect in there, is because of a situation in which a person is intentionally causing a disruption in a government building (assuming you mean public school) that would be a direct insult to multiple people that have no reason to expect anything like that would happen there.
while I don't come close to thinking highly of the people who used that sub (hence my quote in the threads second post) they did not cause anyone harm, and did not violate the rule they are being accused of violating while, while other subs that are much closer to violating those rule are still being left alone.
Mocking a user very directly, maybe. It's probably rather easy to mock a certain opinion or attitude and not catch much for it. But I'm not particularly incensed by it considering most groups of that nature will be private and inaccessible to almost everybody so it stays away from anywhere it can do any greater harm. IIRC, mods can also no longer look into private groups to see what's going on unless they're members of that group.Bat Vader said:I'm pretty sure mocking another user on here while in a user group is against the rules and can get that person moderated if it is reported.
you'll get no argument from me about words hurting, but I don't particularly think that visiting a sub and getting hurt feelings from comments that aren't even being directed at you (assuming this isn't the once in a blue moon chance that you find a picture of yourself has been posted there at a time that you were also on there) causes enough harm to justify killing an entire sub.Kolby Jack said:"Harm" is a difficult thing to measure. If a fat person got on that subreddit, I imagine that would be pretty not-fun for them. If they were of the sort of disposition, they could do something drastic in response. Highly unlikely, sure, and by no means should reddit coddle sensitive people, but I'm just pointing out that it "not causing anyone harm" is probably not true. Words hurt. That's a fact of life.spartenX said:arbitrary considering that it was banned for violating this rule "Keep Everyone Safe: You agree to not intentionally jeopardize the health and safety of others or yourself." despite the fact that there has been no actual reports of that sub (either individual posters, or as a whole) violating said rule or even harassing anyone, while other subs like r/shitredditsays have been known to actually go out of there way to brigade other subs, send threats, and even directly get people fired.Kolby Jack said:I'm not the sort of guy who would refer to basic human decency as an "arbitrary reason" and it's mildly worrying that you apparently are.spartenX said:who cares if its not government induced censorship? the fact is that they decided to ban a subreddit that was not actually harming anyone, for arbitrary reasons. that is still censorship, and it is still a problem, especially on a site that allows other subreddits that actually do directly harass people.BloatedGuppy said:The degree to which this is "censorship" is irrelevant, because we're basically picking nits about where it falls on a completely meaningless scale. It's not government induced censorship. No one's rights are being violated. There is no dangerous chilling effect on the populace's right to dissent. It's the owner of a private website exercising their right to modify their TOU. It happens every day. It's an utter non-event, and should be treated as such.spartenX said:so the reason that saying that freedom of speech is alarmist in this situation, where a subreddit that mainly keeps its stuff to its subreddit and does everything it can to ensure that there is no harassment done to the people it mocks and that it doesn't brigade any other subs and is clearly labeled so you what to expect in there, is because of a situation in which a person is intentionally causing a disruption in a government building (assuming you mean public school) that would be a direct insult to multiple people that have no reason to expect anything like that would happen there.
while I don't come close to thinking highly of the people who used that sub (hence my quote in the threads second post) they did not cause anyone harm, and did not violate the rule they are being accused of violating while, while other subs that are much closer to violating those rule are still being left alone.
I don't recall if it was that subreddit specifically, but, I recall one of the fat-people subreddits had a "Fat to thin Friday" where members spoke about their previous weight and how the sub shocked them into doing something about it.Kolby Jack said:"Harm" is a difficult thing to measure. If a fat person got on that subreddit, I imagine that would be pretty not-fun for them. If they were of the sort of disposition, they could do something drastic in response. Highly unlikely, sure, and by no means should reddit coddle sensitive people, but I'm just pointing out that it "not causing anyone harm" is probably not true. Words hurt. That's a fact of life.
shitredditsays is well known (very well known) for harassing and doxxing people, while FPH was known for having very strict rules in regards to not doing either of those.VanQ said:Here's a list of subreddits that are apparently okay and have not been banned.
/r/picsofdeadkids
/r/coontown
/r/sexyabortions
/r/watchpeopledie
/r/BurningKids
/r/ShitRedditSays
/r/malepeoplehate
/r/watchpeopledie
The bans are less about free speech and more about people actively organizing doxxing and harassment campaigns. Which are things that the banned subreddits actually had a hand in by the looks of it.
Oh, so then the bans were more about feelings than the rules then? How does that not surprise me. Reddit is a site designed from the ground up to promote groupthink, it was only a matter of time before the unpopular opinions got the permanent boot.spartenX said:shitredditsays is well known (very well known) for harassing and doxxing people, while FPH was known for having very strict rules in regards to not doing either of those.VanQ said:Here's a list of subreddits that are apparently okay and have not been banned.
/r/picsofdeadkids
/r/coontown
/r/sexyabortions
/r/watchpeopledie
/r/BurningKids
/r/ShitRedditSays
/r/malepeoplehate
/r/watchpeopledie
The bans are less about free speech and more about people actively organizing doxxing and harassment campaigns. Which are things that the banned subreddits actually had a hand in by the looks of it.
VanQ said:Snip
Here's a thread from Reddit, with some posts explaining the official reason the admins gave. Remember, that subreddit had been around for a long time, but was only banned now.spartenX said:Snip
Mass Effect 3 controversy was dumb, but in hindsight it doesn't make me as frustrated as I thought it would. When I read about them mocking an album of pictures of a deceased, overweight woman's body in a morgue, my blood boils.Shanicus said:Ah, but you're forgetting about the golden internet rule - 'It's different when it can apply to me'. Freedom of Speech according to the internet means 'I can say mean things about people but woe be unto you if you say mean things about me', so seeing people get up in arms over a private site saying 'fuck this particular noise' to a handful of subreddits and jumping on the Censorship Train isn't surprising in the least.Compatriot Block said:I don't even know how to respond to the people willingly comparing themselves to horrifyingly racist subreddits. How can you possibly think that "Oh yeah? If you ban us then why didn't you ban the subreddits about hating black people?" would be met with anything other than "Yeah, those are both awful things, they should both be banned"?
Jesus Christ, this is a group literally standing up for their "right" to hate people. Their name was fatpeopleHATE. They were harrassing individual Imgur staff. The CEO came to them to talk, was relentlessly mocked and immediately banned. Their response to being shut down for spreading their hate outside of their own corner was to spread even more hate in an even larger area.
Is this really the hill people want to make their stands on? If this was a group ridiculing gamers (with pictures and names) and talking about how disgusting they all are, would you be standing up for them?
EDIT: I also love the free speech angle coming from a subreddit who literally had a "no dissent" rule.
Hell, this isn't even the pettiest hill I've seen people die on on the internet. *Thousand Yard Stare as I remember the Mass Effect 3 Ending threads*
I'm only vaguely familiar in that I had a look around there when it was fairly new. Trust me, imageboards and traditional forums are a much better place to discuss things. The biggest problem with Reddit is the upvote system, which means that only the most popular opinions rise to the top while all others naturally sink to the deep depths of the thread where they'll likely never be seen or heard. It's groupthink on an organized scale.Casual Shinji said:Wow... I was never really familiar with Reddit, and now I thank God for that.
Even if you flash in great big neon lights 24/7 people will still say it is. If this is censorship to some people does that mean schools saying don't swear is censorship?BloatedGuppy said:Not a freedom of speech issue.
I think they alway forget they can do that. If they did that it at least make the internet at least a little better.Angelblaze said:OT: The same reason I don't care and, am actually really happy about this, is the same reason this isn't censorship; those people can go someplace else, build themselves a website. They haven't had their freedom of speech taken away, they've been told to stop screaming in the middle of a popular street.
Well I mean, there's hate and circlejerking (we have plenty of that here), and then there's pics of dead kids and sexy abortions!? Like, what the fuck?! Far be it from me to look down on others, but God-fucking-dammit that's revolting!VanQ said:I'm only vaguely familiar in that I had a look around there when it was fairly new. Trust me, imageboards and traditional forums are a much better place to discuss things. The biggest problem with Reddit is the upvote system, which means that only the most popular opinions rise to the top while all others naturally sink to the deep depths of the thread where they'll likely never be seen or heard. It's groupthink on an organized scale.Casual Shinji said:Wow... I was never really familiar with Reddit, and now I thank God for that.
The real problem with this is while anonymous imageboards can provoke brutal honesty, which isn't always the best policy and forums can promote circlejerks, posts are always viewed in the order they were posted rather than being sorted by popularity. So you will at least run into opposing opinions. Something that you wouldn't see on a subreddit. And when you have a subreddit devoted specifically to hate. Well then it can be easy to convince people that that hate is a popular opinion.