See Arkham Origins Multiplayer Chaos

[Buizel91]

Was that Robin Tim Drake or Dick Grayson? I thought Arkahm Origins was going to take place before Batman worked with Robin.

I thought all the villains were supposed to be working together to try and take down Batman in Arkham Origins though. I feel like this should have been used with Arkahm City instead of Origins. Personally, I think the idea of multiplayer in a Batman game is silly.

It's possible the Multiplayer itself has a story after the events of Arkham Origins, seems to be a trait with Multiplayer games these days.

It's possible that during the story, Bane and Joker turn on eachother, and its up to Batman and the newly appointed Robin to stop them.

 

[Buizel91]

so robin has a bullet proof shield. well, balancing is going to be great.

but most people will be pissed that bats just flies around and gives surprise facial reconstruction surgery so they'll demand he be nerfed, when suddenly the god of logic flies down and slaps them for being so stupid.

He had it in AC, the shield brakes after a few hits

 

[Something Amyss]

Because of course it had to have multiplayer. That's why so many people bought the first two, right? Hoping it would have a multiplayer mode?

I think the first two were proof that no game can sell without multiplayer. Hell, it's a miracle we even got lucky enough to have a third after AC only sold....

*looks it up*

barely even 9 million!

How can you expect games to get anywhere if they're not even pulling in double digit (tiems a million) sales!

...I wouldn't mind the multiplayer if it didn't look boilerplate, though.

 

[DarkhoIlow]

I don't get the appeal of multiplayer in a Batman game, I simply don't. The trailer was meh at best,

It really looks tacked on and not necessary. An Arkham game should be able to hold itself on it's own with only the single player counterpart and challenge rooms. Them including multiplayer is just wasted resources and I'm a bit skeptical about their decision with implementing one.