ccdohl said:
wasneeplus said:
ccdohl said:
What's for a xenophobic turd to fail to understand? Some people get murderously violent because of a religion, about 99% of the time, it's a certain religion. I don't have to get a degree in Islamic Studies or anything to want to put a boot to it.
Except it ain't muslims 99% of the time. At the moment, Islam is probably the most violent large religion on earth, but only by a small margin. So what? We gonna boot out all the christians and hindus next?
Ahh, not what I meant by boot. I don't want to boot any law abiding person out of the United States or any other country. I'm just saying that abroad, Islam is super violent and we should recognize that and take steps. The boot being more like a show of force or condemnation than a move to deport people.
And I think you should recheck your numbers. That margin isn't small at all, especially when you take in to account all the religiously motivated Muslim on Muslim violence worldwide.
I should refrain for once,
but come on, this is a skit about religion so of course there is going to be a debate in the comment section.
I think you're mistakenly attributing violent actions to religion, when history, economics and politics all play a much bigger part. That isn't to say religion doesn't motivate rioting or suicide bombers, but I think it is over-simplistic to attribute all that violence to the religion itself - as though we wouldn't have terror attacks if Afghans were Buddhists instead of Muslims.
Poverty and instability are much more common causes of violence, which is why there are plenty of Christian militants across Africa (see also, Mugabe, Kony etc.) and South America. Religion is often used as a justification/rationalization for violence, which has the effect of obscuring the more pragmatic reasons for violence and unrest. It doesn't usually create the desire for violence in the first place.