Dumbed down? Come onDamagedWill said:Resident Evil 5 was a dumbed down, shorter and more annoying Resident Evil 4. They finally had a good inventory system in 4 but they, of course, got rid of it in 5. 5 is also ridiculously short compared to 4. 5 had better weapons in my opinion though. Recycled bosses and enemies. 4 had the Regenerators, 5 didn't have a really cool enemy like that. But it did have the Lickers, which was a nice surprise.Gladion said:Resident Evil 5 was pretty much an exact copy of RE 4 with a different setting and a co-op mode :0 May I ask how RE5 ruined RE4 for you (however this is possible)?NoMoreSanity said:Resident Evil 5. The series was perfect at 4 Capcom, why did you have to ruin it for me?
fix-the-spade said:Any of the numbered or subtitled Sequels to ALIEN!*
*Aliens was neither a numbered nor subtitled sequel, it's just Aliens.That's a pretty brave statment, seeing Aliens is, together with Terminator 2, always mentioned together with the sentence "better than the original".
The sequel that should never have been made was Riddick (the second movie). For fucks sake... unbelievable. How can you go from PITCH BLACK to this?!
When it comes to sequels, it's more of the wasted potential of what could've been then it should have never been.
Firstly, un-twist your underwear... Good, now, what the hell did I do? You said sequels that shouldn't have been made, I stated one?effilctar said:if you're going to offend, try to start arguments and not contribute positively, with all due respect, GTFO of my thread. Thank you Joe182
When I mean dumbed down, I mean mainly in gameplay. I'm not talking storywise or control wise. I agree with the limited inventory increasing tension bit. Daylight was also a refreshing change since RE4 only had a short bit during the day. Actually, the last two bosses of RE5 I thought were pretty cool. Resident Evil always talked Survival Horror but it never quite reached that in my opinion, at least not consistently. The first Silent Hill comes to mind when I think of Survival Horror.Gladion said:Dumbed down? Come onDamagedWill said:Resident Evil 5 was a dumbed down, shorter and more annoying Resident Evil 4. They finally had a good inventory system in 4 but they, of course, got rid of it in 5. 5 is also ridiculously short compared to 4. 5 had better weapons in my opinion though. Recycled bosses and enemies. 4 had the Regenerators, 5 didn't have a really cool enemy like that. But it did have the Lickers, which was a nice surprise.Gladion said:Resident Evil 5 was pretty much an exact copy of RE 4 with a different setting and a co-op mode :0 May I ask how RE5 ruined RE4 for you (however this is possible)?NoMoreSanity said:Resident Evil 5. The series was perfect at 4 Capcom, why did you have to ruin it for me?
fix-the-spade said:Any of the numbered or subtitled Sequels to ALIEN!*
*Aliens was neither a numbered nor subtitled sequel, it's just Aliens.That's a pretty brave statment, seeing Aliens is, together with Terminator 2, always mentioned together with the sentence "better than the original".
The sequel that should never have been made was Riddick (the second movie). For fucks sake... unbelievable. How can you go from PITCH BLACK to this?!
When it comes to sequels, it's more of the wasted potential of what could've been then it should have never been.RE4 was as dumb as any game can get anyways. There wasn't anything to dumb it down. But I have to agree with the inventory system. In a real horror game, a limited inventory makes sense - it increases the tension. But since RE4, Resident Evil was no horror game any more, so it was pointless, as far as I see it. I thought some of the 'Natives' were pretty memorable, at least the ones with the huge clubs. Also, I liked the setting better. Terror in daylight is somehow cooler (yes, there is a difference between horror and terror). The final boss in RE5 was far superior to the one in RE4, I think.
I never bought RE5, but it was pretty damn good. Standing by itself, I think it's even better than RE4. But it recycled many many MANY ideas from its prequel, so there's no way to rate it any higher than RE4.
effilctar said:Final Fantasy 7, 12 and Tactics are all set in Ivalice and in Tactics, Cloud and Balthier come back in time (PSP version) so they're probably the same world just at different times
Prime example of how opinions differ, I'd have put it the other way round then added halo wars shouldn't have been made (at least not for xbox). But anyway, I was more disappointed with Gears of War 2. I liked the first one but there seemed to be no difference between the games, even the plot sounded similar (at least from zp, never bothered pursuing it further).Radeonx said:I disliked Halo 2, but Halo 3 is a good game,
Oh come on we all know Oblivion sucked.I guess some people just like leveling up when they are asleep probably makes you feel you're acomplishing something whenever you take a shit or fall asleep.odubya23 said:Fallout 3. Terrible game, I can't believe people could fool themselves into thinking it was anything other than a shameful franchise rip-off. Oblivion was better, for goodness sakes!