Sequels that were better.
- Thread starter Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon
- Start date
Recommended Videos
except that ther is NO CHALLENGE and the atlantis world was bullshitFallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:
yeah, I agree with you
Streets of Rage 2.
I might argue Baten Kaitos Origins being better than the first game, but it's debatable...and it's a prequel, rather than a sequel.
I might argue Baten Kaitos Origins being better than the first game, but it's debatable...and it's a prequel, rather than a sequel.
removing guest from hitching a ride on a gold member = killer failure.D Bones said:
also, the raping of the hammerburst, failing to have an epic single player general raam ish boss ( scorge? come on, he was epicfail ) also, smoke nades that stun ( they fixed that, admittingly, but it was just the fail. )
il hand you horde though, hordes wuite fun... while it lasts. i like real player better though. also, 5 guys.. not the same as 4, 4 was in your face and personal at all times. 5 is more were a group yo! and the feeling that you dont have to do stuff cause you got enough other guys that will pull stuff off.
No. No it wasn't. By the time you've:Jamiemitsu said:
a) stealthed your way through the Terms and Conditions;
b) fought your way through needlessly large numbers of DRM procedures; and
c) assassinated the account creation procedures on every website and forum you can get an account for,
what's the point of actually playing the game?! You've pretty much beaten it on 'insane difficulty' mode already....
OT: I'm also for ME2 being better than ME1. I thought KotOR2 was better than KotOR1 as well (although I'm prepared to admit the possibility that some people don't agree). Also, there's pretty much no argument that Warcraft 2 was better than WC:O&H, and WC3 was better than WC2.
I know what you mean, most people praise that game like crazy and I really just don't even see their point at all. I liked it, but the first one was way better. I don't think linearity is a bad thing either but I think it detracts from a series that has already set itself up as exploratory rather than just straight through. I always found the inventory fun as hell in the first one, the micromanaging was fricking fun as hell but they could have had an easier way to display it. Also I agree with you on the ammo, I always seemed to have two or three less bullets than were needed to kill any given enemy and the amount of times I ran out of ammo and had to run around the battle field almost dying was ridiculous. I didn't like the regenerating health either, it just seemed like they wanted you to think about less things which is completely opposite to the first game.D Bones said:
I'd have to disagree with Kotor 2, but Half life 2 is spot on in my opinion.DominicxD said:
Anyway, I'd say Starcraft 2 (and that's just considering what I saw in the beta!
)Fable 2,
GRAW 2,
um....Book wise, I thought a Storm of Swords in George RR Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire was better than any before it.
AND TOY STORY 3!!!!
Gothic 2 > Gothic 1
First game had probably better medival atmosphere but second one had better gameplay, harder difficulty, nicer graphic, bigger world, expansion pack, freakin dragons, all you friends from first one plus some new, crafting, better quests, more spells, more weapons, more kinds of armor, more skills and more replay value.
First game had probably better medival atmosphere but second one had better gameplay, harder difficulty, nicer graphic, bigger world, expansion pack, freakin dragons, all you friends from first one plus some new, crafting, better quests, more spells, more weapons, more kinds of armor, more skills and more replay value.