Up in Canada we started the beginings of sexual education in gr1. And I went to a catholic school. Sure they didn't really get into the biological functions and pictures untill gr3. But alot of that teaching was done in a semi-religious context.
By semi-religious I mean that this is done because a man and a women are married to one another and they are doing this for the reason of having a child. Though there was none of this "you are going to burn in hell if you don't...." stuff going on.
By the time we hit around gr7 (as with op) they started teaching about STDs etc...
I think the main cause of the higher than average STD levels in urban areas is going to be more the demographic of the population or the social class although proper education is helping, and I would hate to see what would happen if doctors and schools would still be forbidden to talk about contraceptives and profilactics. The term, "you ain't seen nothin' yet" comes to mind.
By semi-religious I mean that this is done because a man and a women are married to one another and they are doing this for the reason of having a child. Though there was none of this "you are going to burn in hell if you don't...." stuff going on.
By the time we hit around gr7 (as with op) they started teaching about STDs etc...
I think the main cause of the higher than average STD levels in urban areas is going to be more the demographic of the population or the social class although proper education is helping, and I would hate to see what would happen if doctors and schools would still be forbidden to talk about contraceptives and profilactics. The term, "you ain't seen nothin' yet" comes to mind.