Sexism in gaming, do we really give a f**k?

Recommended Videos

Hagi

New member
Apr 10, 2011
2,741
0
0
TehCookie said:
There are always people attracted to everything, don't take it all as absolutes. There's people attacked to kids and animals, that doesn't make them the majority. The majority of both genders are attracted to a healthy weight. That doesn't mean there is no such thing as chubby chasers. If you're catering to a large group of people you try to go for what the majority likes. A lot of men like large boobs, that doesn't mean they exclusively like them but they can still be used for appeal. If men were more varied in their taste why are there not more DFC characters to appeal to that crowd? Now take chest hair on men, what do the majority of women like? There is no clear majority and you see both in movies.
Because there are?

Just take a look at any hottest actresses collection and there's no shortage of women with modest breasts. There'll be a few with truly big ones, a few with truly small ones and most will be just average. Certainly in better shape, but size-wise there's a decent bit of variety. About as much as you'd find in any hottest actors collection.

All of that under the assumption of course that comparing chest hair to breasts is in fact an adequate comparison...

As for women really being that much more varied in their tastes when it comes to mainstream advertising, I'm not really seeing it... [http://images.google.com/search?q=romance+novel+cover&tbm=isch]
 

flarty

New member
Apr 26, 2012
632
0
0
Hagi said:
TehCookie said:
There are always people attracted to everything, don't take it all as absolutes. There's people attacked to kids and animals, that doesn't make them the majority. The majority of both genders are attracted to a healthy weight. That doesn't mean there is no such thing as chubby chasers. If you're catering to a large group of people you try to go for what the majority likes. A lot of men like large boobs, that doesn't mean they exclusively like them but they can still be used for appeal. If men were more varied in their taste why are there not more DFC characters to appeal to that crowd? Now take chest hair on men, what do the majority of women like? There is no clear majority and you see both in movies.
Because there are?

Just take a look at any hottest actresses collection and there's no shortage of women with modest breasts. There'll be a few with truly big ones, a few with truly small ones and most will be just average. Certainly in better shape, but size-wise there's a decent bit of variety. About as much as you'd find in any hottest actors collection.

All of that under the assumption of course that comparing chest hair to breasts is in fact an adequate comparison...

As for women really being that much more varied in their tastes when it comes to mainstream advertising, I'm not really seeing it... [http://images.google.com/search?q=romance+novel+cover&tbm=isch]
After clicking your link, i was immediately drawn to this one, which leaves me with the conclusions be everyone's taste.
 

RanD00M

New member
Oct 26, 2008
6,947
0
0
Chemical Alia said:
Yeah, and I hope people keep talking about it until the industry starts to change. I want to be comfortable with the games I play and proud of the games I work on.
Then don't play the games that make you feel uncomfortable.
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,473
0
0
Rob Robson said:
Actually, there are more men between 25 and 35 playing video games than there are 15-25.
OK, include them in the range then.
My point stands; pandering publishers will pander as long as they think it will get them numbers.

Meatspinner said:
If I had to take a guess as to why, I'd say it because of these badges

- Excellent Topic - Create a thread that receives over 51 replies
- Amazing Topic! - 1,001 replies
- Hot Topic - Create a thread that receives 1,001 views
- On Fire - 10,001 views
- Forum Inferno - 100,001 views
-
And I believe we have a winner.
Every time I see a hot button topic pop up, especially if it's redundant, I always assume that the first reason is to fish for those badges. And right now, topics about Feminism+Gaming have strong potential for knee-jerk reactions and pretension, (both of which are good for farming badges as they tend to rile people up) rather than rational discussion.

The telltale sign of someone "fishing" for the Hot Topic badges is if their opening post includes something like:
"I know everyone is tired of this" | "I don't mean to troll/flame" | "Yes, it's another one of threads, if you don't like it don't read it" | ""..etc.

They are admitting that they are aware that their topic is controversial, overdone and/or completely redundant at that time. But they know it will draw in numbers and uselessly go in circles anyway.

Fact of the matter is: "Trolling" in that manner is the best way of getting those badges, rather than creating a good topic.
*shrugs* I can't blame them for exploiting this, because it's just how the internet behaves.
Plus, it's not like those topics cannot be entertaining or informative...but you have to dig to find it.

Incidentally, when people tire of overdone topics, and make a topic pointing out the problem, many users will jump on them for "ironically" creating a topic about whatever they're complaining about in an attempt to look clever; using something akin to the tired and logically broken "If you complain about complaining, you're a hypocrite" argument.

It's broken logic for two reasons:
1) Dismissing someone on account of hypocrisy is a fallacy, no matter the context. You are in the wrong, no matter how "good" it feels to call someone a hypocrite.
2) Complaining about the overexposure of a given subject is not the same as complaining specifically about subject .
The direct object for discussion is the number of threads about , and not the topic of itself. These are two different subjects, that while related, are not equatable.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
flarty said:
So I'm not allowed to voice my opinion
Nobody said that. You clearly "give a fuck" about this if you're not only willing to defend it, but then to make a strawman argument about not being able to voice your opinion.

You're able to voice your opinion. I'm able to tell you how I feel about it. Don't complain when someone does exactly what you claim to support.
 

MorganL4

Person
May 1, 2008
1,364
0
0
flarty said:
MorganL4 said:
Hitman's image plays to the male fantasy of the "forbidden fruit" being sexualized and made available for objectification.
Sorry i read this, laughed and stopped reading. Really? i think your reading too much into it, i see nuns in latex holding guns. That isn't pandering to my sexual desires. Its so over the top its fucking hilarious. But if it panders to yours, what ever floats your boat.
Really? You honestly believe that they chose to dress the assassins up as nuns because of some random number generator type thing? You believe that there was no "intent" behind it? The WHOLE reason you found it "over the top" was because they were dressed as nuns, nuns who were being turned into sex objects. The goal was to sensationalize the image, that was the WHOLE point, otherwise it wouldn't have been in the advertisement for the game. Are you saying that you do not recognize that dressing women up in latex is an attempt to illicit a sexual response of some sort? ( if it didn't in you fine, didn't for me either) But to not see that that was the intent seems like you are actively turning a blind eye to the intent. And yes the whole reason they chose nuns is because by definition nuns are chaste.
 

flarty

New member
Apr 26, 2012
632
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
flarty said:
So I'm not allowed to voice my opinion
Nobody said that. You clearly "give a fuck" about this if you're not only willing to defend it, but then to make a strawman argument about not being able to voice your opinion.

You're able to voice your opinion. I'm able to tell you how I feel about it. Don't complain when someone does exactly what you claim to support.
So you here to criticise me putting my views across, i never said i didn't give a fuck. Read the title again and you will find its asking a question that I have not answered. When i say i dont see it as an issue, i should rather say i don't see it as the issue its presented to be (i was pissed at the time of writing this article so forgive me if it wasnt isnt the cleariest of presentations). Thats what i said before in other words. But you seemed to of left that out of the quote.

MorganL4 said:
flarty said:
MorganL4 said:
Hitman's image plays to the male fantasy of the "forbidden fruit" being sexualized and made available for objectification.
Sorry i read this, laughed and stopped reading. Really? i think your reading too much into it, i see nuns in latex holding guns. That isn't pandering to my sexual desires. Its so over the top its fucking hilarious. But if it panders to yours, what ever floats your boat.
Really? You honestly believe that they chose to dress the assassins up as nuns because of some random number generator type thing? You believe that there was no "intent" behind it? The WHOLE reason you found it "over the top" was because they were dressed as nuns, nuns who were being turned into sex objects. The goal was to sensationalize the image, that was the WHOLE point, otherwise it wouldn't have been in the advertisement for the game. Are you saying that you do not recognize that dressing women up in latex is an attempt to illicit a sexual response of some sort? ( if it didn't in you fine, didn't for me either) But to not see that that was the intent seems like you are actively turning a blind eye to the intent. And yes the whole reason they chose nuns is because by definition nuns are chaste.
So your saying they wanted everyone who watched the advert to get a boner? Your saying that they were trying to sell the game to sadomasochists (cant believe i spelt that right first time) with a fetish for nuns and guns?
 

Paradoxrifts

New member
Jan 17, 2010
917
0
0
IceForce said:
If no one truly gave a fuck about this, we wouldn't have 20 page threads on it every week.
If the moderators permanently banned the same eight or so goons on each side that show up for each and every thread it'd be at most a four page thread every fortnight.
 

flarty

New member
Apr 26, 2012
632
0
0
Shanicus said:
flarty said:
You still expect me to believe me that you have never come into contact with any pop music in the last decade, what are you a shut in? don't own a TV? don't even watch the news or read any news paper? It's near impossible to escape for that long. Not being involved in commenting on sexism on the industry isn't the problem, its when someone raises the subject and you say you don't care is the issue. Its that double standard that makes any argument regarding sexism in the gaming industry meaningless and hypocritical. If you said something along the lines of, "yeah its bad that sexism is present in the music industry, but it doesn't mean it should be acceptable in the gaming industry." Then i could at least hold some respect for your opinion
Tada! Finally, he gets it! While I do own a TV, I don't sit around and watch the music channels. This 'near impossible to escape' thing has actually been really easy, since (as I said earlier) all my interactions with the music industry are filtered through other people just recommending music to me.

The second part of your post is just... what? What part of 'opposed to sexism in general' did you miss? The whole of it, or just the important parts? Despite not caring about the music industry in any way, shape or form, I'm still against sexism in the music industry by being against sexism in general. Not rocket science. If it makes you feel better, you can expand my initial 'I do not discuss sexism in the music labels because I do not care about the music industry' into 'I do not discuss sexism in the music labels because I do not care about the music industry, but still oppose sexual discrimination within the music industry despite not possessing the necessary knowledge to argue against it'.

Ahh, defending oneself against baseless accusations that are being stubbornly clung to despite evidence to the contrary... man, I missed these kinds of threads. I really should get into these more often.
Well you've certainly changed your tune from not giving a fuck.
 

JaiDin

New member
May 10, 2008
10
0
0
No we don't. Before they start on the gaming industry, they should stop the sexism in the female romance novel industry and Lifetime Chanel. Games don't hold a candle to those.
 

Gethsemani_v1legacy

New member
Oct 1, 2009
2,552
0
0
JaiDin said:
No we don't. Before they start on the gaming industry, they should stop the sexism in the female romance novel industry and Lifetime Chanel. Games don't hold a candle to those.
And neither of those hold a candle to the "adult entertainment industry", colloquially known as "porn", which is entirely focused on selling to men. But you know what? I don't read romance novels, watch Lifetime or porn regularly, if at all. I play games however and I can get pretty tired of seeing the same tired tropes about women being re-threaded in most games.

There's nothing to say that we can't clean up sexism romance novels, lifetime and porn while also doing it in the gaming industry. But that's not really what your argument is about is it? What you are trying to do is to imply that one particular subset of media (female oriented romance) is rife with sexism and that it is worse than the sexism in gaming. That way anyone who dares complain about the sexism in gaming can immediately be labeled a hypocrite for not also complaining about the female romance media. It is cool and all that you use low brow rhetoric like that, but it is exactly that: Low brow rhetoric meant to shutdown the discussion by endlessly shifting blame around instead of addressing whatever relevant critique might be leveled at the sexism in the gaming industry.

It is essentially the sexism-discussion equivalent of the "men get raped in prison too!"-argument used to shut down discussions about rape. You really don't care about whatever odd conception of gender exists on Lifetime, but it serves as an excellent batting tool for dismissing arguments that implies there might exist sexism in gaming. And even if you do care about the shitty gender portrayals in Lifetime and romance novels (and my apologies for sounding harsh if you do care) there's nothing to suggest that we can't discuss and try to change the sexism in both concurrently instead of having to grade them and "fix them" one at a time.
 

runic knight

New member
Mar 26, 2011
1,118
0
0
Gethsemani said:
JaiDin said:
No we don't. Before they start on the gaming industry, they should stop the sexism in the female romance novel industry and Lifetime Chanel. Games don't hold a candle to those.
And neither of those hold a candle to the "adult entertainment industry", colloquially known as "porn", which is entirely focused on selling to men. But you know what? I don't read romance novels, watch Lifetime or porn regularly, if at all. I play games however and I can get pretty tired of seeing the same tired tropes about women being re-threaded in most games.

There's nothing to say that we can't clean up sexism romance novels, lifetime and porn while also doing it in the gaming industry. But that's not really what your argument is about is it? What you are trying to do is to imply that one particular subset of media (female oriented romance) is rife with sexism and that it is worse than the sexism in gaming. That way anyone who dares complain about the sexism in gaming can immediately be labeled a hypocrite for not also complaining about the female romance media. It is cool and all that you use low brow rhetoric like that, but it is exactly that: Low brow rhetoric meant to shutdown the discussion by endlessly shifting blame around instead of addressing whatever relevant critique might be leveled at the sexism in the gaming industry.

It is essentially the sexism-discussion equivalent of the "men get raped in prison too!"-argument used to shut down discussions about rape. You really don't care about whatever odd conception of gender exists on Lifetime, but it serves as an excellent batting tool for dismissing arguments that implies there might exist sexism in gaming. And even if you do care about the shitty gender portrayals in Lifetime and romance novels (and my apologies for sounding harsh if you do care) there's nothing to suggest that we can't discuss and try to change the sexism in both concurrently instead of having to grade them and "fix them" one at a time.
I think you miss the point of the comparison, at least from some people who use it. It isn't so much "Well, there is sexism on the other foot over there, so stop complaining." That isn't the point, or at least shouldn't be for calling up comparisons. It is rather a demonstration of OTHER sorts of gender influenced demographic targeting by companies. Rather then saying "look at all the other sexism" It is instead saying "look at all these other examples that aren't sexism and tell me what makes the case against gaming so special". It is attempting to reveal special pleading in the arguments about the game industry and show it for the logical fallacy it is.

This isn't, if you'll excuse the phrase, a dick measuring contest here. It isn't about the depth of sexism everywhere. It is about a behavior that many, many companies do when it comes to making money: targeting a demographic that is most likely to buy their product and designing the product and presentation towards increasing that chance. And the only reason they keep doing it is it is still effective in the end. They have a product that sells. And if the behavior they use to sell cheesy romance novels is fine and the behavior they use to sell crappy dramas is fine and the behavior they use to sell un-needed power tools is fine, and the behavior we use to sell movies and tv shows is fine, why in the hell do we suddenly draw a line with video games? And why do we have to draw the line with this overblown emotional appeal? Don't like a product, don't buy it. The products that don't get business fail and the ideals behind them dry up.
But... that is the problem, isn't it? They wont dry up because there is still a market for them. And for some reason, that there is a market for them bothers you. This isn't that people want more female protagonists or better developed stories, since the demand is starting to be meet on its own as companies that offer those products do well in their own way. This is based on using an emotionally loaded term to try to force an ideal on a product and product maker because it affronts you. Is that why all these treads are "this that and the other thing is sexist!" rather then "We should make more female protagonist" or "We need better stories" Or even, "We need more variety in game characters." Because we already have THOSE threads, where people are tossing ideas of how to improve things, not at the expense of other games, not as a negative bashing of all things Dude-bro, but as alternatives and cries of out demand for a product. Look At Jim's "Perfect Pasta Sauces" vid and you'll see what I mean about a demand that isn't being meet and is barely known by people buying games half the time. But this? This is little more then emotional blackmail and slander because people don't like the look or don't like that something that offends them is popular. Feminist don't like that men are seeing women portrayed in a light that isn't aligned with their views of what the would should be. This is Christians crying fowl against rock music with a different coat of paint.


It isn't that there isn't sexism in games, lifetime or whatever. It is the very nature in which the discussion on it has gone. We get hundreds of assholes crying fowl and sexism on games without knowing half of what they are talking about based solely on a knee-jerk reaction from an outside appearance. Sexy character? Must be sexism! That isn't a discussion on it, that is a god damn waste of everyone's time. Red shirt, Communist! White protagonist? Racist! That is the crap of demagogs, and we all know how good for discussions they are...

I've tried may times to discuss the underlying issues that bubble up as the very things people call sexism and the like. Hell, go back a page in this very thread for just one example of me trying to do just that. But no one wants that it seems. All this talk of wanting a discussion goes out the damn window when people try to root out the cause of why things are. Instead we get people tossing emotionally loaded labels at each other and the "discussion" never gets higher then a lame war. And people wonder why I call people like Anita Toxic and cancerous to video games when they breed this sort of behavior and profit off it's continuation.


wow, that line of thought seemed to run off...
 

Gethsemani_v1legacy

New member
Oct 1, 2009
2,552
0
0
runic knight said:
-The long snip-
In short: I think you are missing my point. I don't think the skewed gender stereotypes in romance novels, on Lifetime, in porn or in advertising for power tools is any better than skewed gender stereotypes in games. In general I dislike stereotype gender portrayals and that's what I am rallying against. But that's only part of the problem in gaming (and all those other places).

The problem is that every time we are shown or told that women are damsels in distress that needs a big manly man to come save us we are internalizing that idea. Every time we are told that men are either abusive bastards or prince charming we are internalizing that idea. Get fed the same image enough times and eventually you will automatically associate it with similar situations. This is why stereotypes and sexism is so insidious, because sexism isn't something you wake up one day and decide that you will embrace. No, sexism is something you slowly develop as you are steeped in a society and culture that constantly reinforces sexistic ideals.

That's why we need both to promote the people that do non-sexist things or actively subvert it (like Joss Whedon) and speak up against those that reinforce sexist ideals or tropes, because acting against sexism is a constant struggle to make people aware of it. Because we see it every day and most of the time, most of us don't even reflect on what we are seeing or that it might contain negative portrayals of a particular gender. Doesn't matter if it is another girl in a bikini looking down at you from a billboard or a radio talkshow host telling us that real men don't cry or even if it is a game where you play a male plumber that has to rescue a princess from a dragon-turtle-monster-thing. In the end they are all reinforcing sexist stereotypes.

As much as I think Damsel in Distress is dumb, I still enjoy Super Mario. Speaking up against sexism in a medium or in a particular part of a medium (like a game or a certain developer) doesn't mean I can't enjoy the rest of that medium or product. I can enjoy Burn Notice despite those really shitty intercuts where it is established that the show takes place in Miami by showing us quick cuts of girls in minimalist bikinis. Likewise I can enjoy being a part of the gaming community and be an active consumer of the gaming industry despite all the atrocious stuff they make in regards to women, equality and GLBT-issues.

Speaking up against the bad sides is just as important as promoting the good. Maybe you disagree with what I consider bad, but that only means we should have a discussion about whatever or not there's some substance to my claims that game X contains a sexist element. It doesn't mean that I should be painted out to be some fringe lunatic who's out to suppress freedom of expression and wants to institute a matriarchy. Because when you set out to do that (like you did in your post) you are doing the exact same thing you accused me of doing.


runic knight said:
I've tried may times to discuss the underlying issues that bubble up as the very things people call sexism and the like. Hell, go back a page in this very thread for just one example of me trying to do just that. But no one wants that it seems. All this talk of wanting a discussion goes out the damn window when people try to root out the cause of why things are. Instead we get people tossing emotionally loaded labels at each other and the "discussion" never gets higher then a lame war. And people wonder why I call people like Anita Toxic and cancerous to video games when they breed this sort of behavior and profit off it's continuation.
And this edit of yours only really shows that you and I are pretty much on the same page. While I might disagree with your take on Sarkeesian, we seem to be on the same page as to where these discussions ought to go: To a place where we can analyze these things some of us perceive as problematic or sexist instead of just flame warring it up.
 

Bug MuIdoon

New member
Mar 28, 2013
285
0
0
maninahat said:
If you honestly believe that the subjectivity of beauty excuses the way characters are designed, then you'd have no right to complain if, for example, every character was designed as semi-naked, wrinkly old person. After all, it's only *your* opinion that they are unattractive - perhaps someone out there might be turned on by old people, so it's totally fine as it is and you should stop complaining.

The point being made is that game designers rarely make a conspicuous effort to design male characters that are physically appealing to female gamers. Whilst what women find attractive tends to vary (and there is perhaps a woman out there who does find Marcus Fenix attractive), it isn't hard to figure out what most women tend to find sexy, and nor is it too much effort to try. But games don't, and few characters are made with any consideration to women. This is in contrast to female character design. Game designers seem to have no trouble in making them appealing for male gamers.
Sorry, haven't been at a PC for the weekend.

You're right, I would have no right to complain if all characters were to be designed as wrinkly old people. I don't design these games, someone else does. They design it in a way that appeals to them, if I happen to like it then that's great for me and also for the designer. If I don't, then so what? That is the way of art. If, however, I funded a game before it was made, then I would have a little more 'right' to complain.

Also, your analogy is quite far fetched. Comparing every character being the same to the standard of today's designs is ridiculous. They're far some being exactly the same. I don't deny that there's a lack of female protagonist in gaming, but to say that all characters are designed to look the same is madness.

I'm aware of the points that are being made, but they still don't make sense. In fact your whole second paragraph makes very little sense apart from line "what women find attractive tends to vary"
If you can honestly say "it isn't hard to figure out what women tend to find sexy" then you're a genius! Men have struggled to understand what women find attractive or want since the dawn of time. Which is probably a good point to the discussion at hand, in itself, being that the majority of designers are male. I don't think women know what all women want either. It's a fairly regular occurrence between me and my good friends ( whom I've known for many, many years and are both male and female) where someone states that X celebrity is attractive and the rest laugh and say such things as "you what?!"

'Women' - and I'm grouping them together now for arguments sake,constantly voice, vote, state, poll, opinionate on people they find attractive within the media. Which 'celebrities', sports stars, musicians, film stars etc. they find attractive. As far as I can tell, a lot of AAA male game's characters are usually designed around this type of male, and are aimed at the female demographic.

I sit on the fence with this argument towards sexism in gaming, as yes, there is a lot of it, but there is also a huge amount of opinionated dribble constantly floating around too.
The one thing that genuinely pisses me off about the debate is the fact that the word 'Games' is mentioned. There are literally hundreds of thousands of games out there, and this tends to be forgotten due to a fairly small handful of AAA games.

It's like saying "'reading literature' is sexist"! Well, yes. Look how much of it there is, some of it is incredibly well written, deep or pro-feminine and other aspects are just shite, awful, sexist Heat/Glamour magazines (which incidentally are funded, edited, written and produced mainly by women)

It's this sort of 'mom and pop' logic that leads to silly opinions of "Games are bad, (mkay) They make people do school shootings"


Captcha: that escalated quickly. Let's hope not Captcha.
 

runic knight

New member
Mar 26, 2011
1,118
0
0
Gethsemani said:
runic knight said:
-The long snip-
In short: I think you are missing my point. I don't think the skewed gender stereotypes in romance novels, on Lifetime, in porn or in advertising for power tools is any better than skewed gender stereotypes in games. In general I dislike stereotype gender portrayals and that's what I am rallying against. But that's only part of the problem in gaming (and all those other places).

The problem is that every time we are shown or told that women are damsels in distress that needs a big manly man to come save us we are internalizing that idea. Every time we are told that men are either abusive bastards or prince charming we are internalizing that idea. Get fed the same image enough times and eventually you will automatically associate it with similar situations. This is why stereotypes and sexism is so insidious, because sexism isn't something you wake up one day and decide that you will embrace. No, sexism is something you slowly develop as you are steeped in a society and culture that constantly reinforces sexistic ideals.

That's why we need both to promote the people that do non-sexist things or actively subvert it (like Joss Whedon) and speak up against those that reinforce sexist ideals or tropes, because acting against sexism is a constant struggle to make people aware of it. Because we see it every day and most of the time, most of us don't even reflect on what we are seeing or that it might contain negative portrayals of a particular gender. Doesn't matter if it is another girl in a bikini looking down at you from a billboard or a radio talkshow host telling us that real men don't cry or even if it is a game where you play a male plumber that has to rescue a princess from a dragon-turtle-monster-thing. In the end they are all reinforcing sexist stereotypes.

As much as I think Damsel in Distress is dumb, I still enjoy Super Mario. Speaking up against sexism in a medium or in a particular part of a medium (like a game or a certain developer) doesn't mean I can't enjoy the rest of that medium or product. I can enjoy Burn Notice despite those really shitty intercuts where it is established that the show takes place in Miami by showing us quick cuts of girls in minimalist bikinis. Likewise I can enjoy being a part of the gaming community and be an active consumer of the gaming industry despite all the atrocious stuff they make in regards to women, equality and GLBT-issues.

Speaking up against the bad sides is just as important as promoting the good. Maybe you disagree with what I consider bad, but that only means we should have a discussion about whatever or not there's some substance to my claims that game X contains a sexist element. It doesn't mean that I should be painted out to be some fringe lunatic who's out to suppress freedom of expression and wants to institute a matriarchy. Because when you set out to do that (like you did in your post) you are doing the exact same thing you accused me of doing.
I think you greatly underestimate people when you say that they internalize the stories by sexist undertones. The idea is no different then the same arguments used about violence in games being internalized, and it falls just as flat once you look at the any data on the topic. The same stories, themes and tropes have existed from the dawn of story telling, yet we our cultures have grown and matured just fine, with progress being made towards equality regardless that the stories exist. I understand the appeal of he idea, that being told something enough will have you believe it, but that isn't the case. There is more to the mechanism then seeing the same story repeatedly, otherwise culture itself wouldn't have grown towards equality at all. We pushed towards equality not because more stories showed it, rather, more stories came as the result of it. Culture itself plays a large part in causing internalization, reinforcement by people and opinions. In our current culture though, that just is not there, and no, I don't mean the same stories being used all the time, but rather the societal and legal pressures that would force the internalization by preventing any deviation. In short, unless people are prevented from doing other stories in some manner, it is not enough to reinforce the idea to an extent it would affect culture negatively, especially as it was far more restrictive in the past and we keep growing more liberal as time goes on in this culture.

The problem arises when you start to look for sexism, because you can, and many will, see it in EVERYTHING the same way that people saw communism or devil influence or whatever else. When you look for subtext and underlying meaning, you will find it, and it becomes a self fullfilling prophesy. It is good to promote those that subvert things, but we should be aware of why it is note worthy. It has nothing to do with them being on the correct moral ground but rather they doing something less common if not unique. Once you start to lose sight of why it is noteworthy for an idealogy, you will see that abused in return. Look no farther then mass produced women empowerment self help crap to see how what started as a subversion of commonality in trying to offer ways for women to help themselves feel more empowered was abused and because of it being associated with a "morally superior" idea, has run rampant and can deflect any criticism by claiming the moral high ground by association.

One can criticize and enjoy something, I made no argument against that. I merely argue against HOW things are criticized and call out unfair ones when I see it. And most of the time, yes, I see complaints about character design as nothing more then nit picks based in personal bias rather then legitimate issue to critic. And the one about the "atrocious" stuff they make towards non-straight males is one I can call out, as it isn't that it is atrocious towards them, rather it is not made for them. They aren't the target demographic and that is being seen as something against them, with is patently absurd (the exceptions that exist not-withstanding. See my comments on two examples in a previous post a page back). Not being marketed towards, being ignored in how one group will respond while concentrating on another is not something being made as atrocious towards them. It is ignoring a potential demographic, which is bad idea in it's own right, but not having a product made to suit everyone equally is not the same thing as intentionally making a product designs to offend them.

I am not saying you can't have your opinion, I am arguing that 1. when you use emotionally loaded language and concentrate on accusations, you are arguing badly and in a way that presents your own ideals as more important then the creators and the audience that already exists for the game. And 2. Calling that out and explaining why it is a flawed rational is not the same as saying you can't have your opinion, merely you lack the right to dictate to others that your own opinion is better the point of slandering what they may enjoy and implicating them with that same emotionally loaded language. And because of how sensationalism works, when you say something is sexist, it brings, as you said, certain predispositions and ideas with it, and for most people, it is an instant rejection if not attack against anything that is "sexist". That is why I called it emotional blackmail, as you use a term with a strong emotional response to it and for people onto the defensive to justify it if they like it, or quietly validate those that dislike it already, a rather insidious and divisive tactic, conscious of it or not.
 

Insanely Asinine

New member
Sep 7, 2010
73
0
0
Lee Oyd said:
Just about every game ever hates women. Welp, I think I'll buy no game ever. That'll work.
That would work. If there were more people doing it. Don't like it don't feed the beast producing it. This in the economic field is what we call boycotting. It can work if you are willing to stay with it.