Sexual Fantasy vs. Sexual Morality
- Thread starter Gentile
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Wat.bahumat42 said:#Wadders said:What 2 (or more) constenting people of the appropriate age do in their own bedrooms is their business alone.
So in answer to your question; nope.
what so its ok for them to start eating each other or making anthrax?
The thread is about sex, so I mean what they do sexually is their business alone. Obviosly that does not apply to the illegal stuff you mentioned. Surely I dont really need to explain that...
Sure we should have a line. But it should only turn the most depraved and fucked up acts off-limits. Everything else (and that would be alot) would be fine so long as its two consenting people.
The problem with the OP's question is that they are basing it from completely incorrect information. There was never a time ever when the only thing acceptable was "your typical vanilla sex between a married man and woman". Never. There are some groups who would like to THINK that is the truth, but it never is, and never was, and god hopes there never will be, because that is the sort of thought and behavior control that we should never ever hope to have.
What people choose to do sexually, with whom, how often, how many and in any variation of consenting adults is absolutely no business of anyone who is not involved. Anything else is people sticking their nose in where it doesn't belong and isn't welcome.
What people choose to do sexually, with whom, how often, how many and in any variation of consenting adults is absolutely no business of anyone who is not involved. Anything else is people sticking their nose in where it doesn't belong and isn't welcome.
As long as sex happens between two consenting adults or sufficiently close equivalents and it happens where it doesn't bother people (the streets, the office, etc.), it's none of my business.
I don't do sex, so I can't really comment on what makes one kind of sexual activity more pleasurable than the other.
I don't do sex, so I can't really comment on what makes one kind of sexual activity more pleasurable than the other.
Consenting adults. That is all that is required. The rest is up to them as long as they don't hurt anyone else.
I don't really think ex requires boundary pushing. However, provided we're talking about consenting adults, I'm pretty much apathetic. Until someone dies or similar.
There is no "sexual immorality" between two consenting adults within a sexual experience, contrary to the "moral pedestal" position some religions try to be presumptuous with. Once you get past the consensual line of things, then it becomes a concern.Gentile said:
Otherwise, what happens in the bedroom with consent, is no one else's business. End of fucking story (no pun intended, of course).
2 or more consenting adults etc.
Personally as long as it doesn't involve poop or piss or another dude I'm good as long as the lady in question is actively into it, it's not really as much fun if they're just going along with it for your sake. Also razors or sharp blades of any kind, don't like them.
Personally as long as it doesn't involve poop or piss or another dude I'm good as long as the lady in question is actively into it, it's not really as much fun if they're just going along with it for your sake. Also razors or sharp blades of any kind, don't like them.
I think that line has always been a best a grey and murky area. The idea that sexuality (and related issues like hetero-bi-homo- sexuality and/or marriage and family) has ever been standard is a modern myth constructed largely in our own lifetime.Gentile said:
One of my favorite examples, transvestite vikings.
http://www.idavallen.org/artiklar/transvikings.html
Morality doesn't exist. It's an antiquated social construct old and conservative people use to justify their bigotry and their megalomaniac tendencies to want to run other people's lives as a vicarious way to overcompensate for their own sad existence.
If everyone involved is consenting, do whatever the hell you want.
If everyone involved is consenting, do whatever the hell you want.
We are social and with that sexual creatures.
And I see no reason to surpress that nature based on majority opinion, or in this case, the Jane/Joe preference. But we need to be more informative in this area, sex ed should be universal and not having it out of question, because it is truly important.
How you do it doesn't matter to me, if you're gay and want anal sex with your partner, why should I stop you? If you're heterosexual and want to have a one night stand with some chick/guy you met at the bar, sure!
I don't have to watch or care unless it directly affects me, so why should I have a say?
And I see no reason to surpress that nature based on majority opinion, or in this case, the Jane/Joe preference. But we need to be more informative in this area, sex ed should be universal and not having it out of question, because it is truly important.
How you do it doesn't matter to me, if you're gay and want anal sex with your partner, why should I stop you? If you're heterosexual and want to have a one night stand with some chick/guy you met at the bar, sure!
I don't have to watch or care unless it directly affects me, so why should I have a say?