wulf3n said:If it is so ubiquitous evidence should be easy to come by.

Took less than 30 seconds to find on google.
Can we move along to fruitful discussion now?
wulf3n said:If it is so ubiquitous evidence should be easy to come by.
I know this is supposed to be a serious thread and such jokes are a no-no, but...come on, that is brilliant, I laughed for WAY longer than I should have at thatDracoSuave said:img]http://www.psu.com/media/articles/image/ghostfemale.jpg
Took less than 30 seconds to find on google.
Can we move along to fruitful discussion now?
Depends on the discussion.DracoSuave said:wulf3n said:If it is so ubiquitous evidence should be easy to come by.![]()
Took less than 30 seconds to find on google.
Can we move along to fruitful discussion now?
Though due to words used like "toxic influence", "anti-woman--misogynistic" and "self hate" that statement is difficult to prove without a census of the gaming community.a pervasive toxic influence in the gaming culture that is anti-woman--misogynistic individuals that displace their selfhate upon the female gender for any number of reasons?
Anecdotal 'evidence' is not real or useful evidence. Also that hardly seems sexist to me, more like a joke.DracoSuave said:wulf3n said:If it is so ubiquitous evidence should be easy to come by.![]()
Took less than 30 seconds to find on google.
Can we move along to fruitful discussion now?
Hold up there m8.DracoSuave said:wulf3n said:If it is so ubiquitous evidence should be easy to come by.![]()
Took less than 30 seconds to find on google.
Can we move along to fruitful discussion now?
You are a champion mate. no irony, this is exactly my sentiment as well.Redd the Sock said:From Parasite Eve to Fatal Frame to Beyond Good and Evil to Xenosaga, to any number for Final Fantasies, to Heavenly Sword to Mirror's Edge to Remember Me and dozens of others, there are a lot of games that did passibly to bad that need to be overcome before women will be seen as a demographic to market to without question. It's why I think Women need more positive involvement, not internet complaining. Companies would take the whole issue more seriously if something in the digital library shot up in sales as a sign that this demographic did actually exist. Without that, they become inclined to file it with stuff from PETA, One Million Moms, and other moralist groups that just want to tell them what to do.
I'm sorry (no I'm not), I read this and all I can think of was this:wulf3n said:It is my personal belief that sexist abuse on the internet doesn't stem from an inherent misogyny but rather a desire to antagonize people for amusement, using what is perceived to be the most volatile slur for the current audience. So the increase in feminist activity will only see in increase in "misogyny"
Though I've yet to prove this so take it with a grain of salt.
This has nothing to do with sexism, she was attacked because her opinions are vile and in direct contradiction with values most sane people have for art.Ragsnstitches said:Anita has an opinion? Deserves to be attacked at every possible oppurtunity and desperate attempts to turn into some kind of counter-culture villain.
Again nothing to with sexism.Hepler wrote some shit for Bioware and has the audacity to have an opinion? Is the reason for all that is wrong with gaming and deserves an onslaught of abuse.
citation needed.Male only focus testers. Because women don't play games, so we make games for men, so we get men to tell us what they want, which makes the appeal of the game gender focused, meaning it is less appealing for women but women don't play games?
Male centric cover art. If she isn't showing tits or ass she is going to the back of the box.
A worthless bit of anecdotal evidence that tells us nothing beyond how BI specifically was marketed.Male centric marketing campaigns. If we have women in the game, let's completely ignore them and show all the men shooting stuff. Bioshock Infinites ad spot had this. For all the ad would tell us, all Booker would be doing in the game is rescuing some freaking Disney princess from cartoon villains. Despite Ken Levines "This is Elizabeths story" they certainly didn't try and sell it as such... I wonder why.
Sexualisation is not inherently indicative of sexism.Gratuitous sexualisation of Women (this is a wider media problem, but it still relates heavily to this topic).
Where as male characters are so well written and human? Could it not be that disposable female characters is indicative of bad writing in video games not sexism?A woman can rarely just be a character with irrelevant female genitalia, they have to be a Token female character with mandatory sex appeal and must make the player feel good about themselves by telling us how awesome we are.
Any evidence to back up the claim this attitude is more than just a handful of people getting angry on internet forums?An extension of this is the victim complex a LOT of Men have as "hardcore" gamers and nerds, and they see women as the quintessential "casual" who needs to be put through some sort of gauntlet to qualify as a gamer or a nerd, if not be sneered at or accosted for having the gall to step into our play spaces.
Again do you have any evidence that women are disproportionately insulted while playing games?Disproportionate and highly gender specific abuse on public gaming spaces
Wow more worthless anecdotal tripe! I sure am convinced.(Fat Ugly Slutty is often posted on these topics, I'm not going to bother, you can google it yourself since I figure you wouldn't even click the link if I did post it... it's also far from the only source of this stuff)
Anecdotal, no evidence its widespread and not a small minority etc etc yada yadaHeck, a recent topic on THIS site was titled "Why are women so fickle?". As if the authors piss poor luck is somehow indicative of an entire gender.
Some of attacks aimed at Anita were simple stupid lashing out. Everyone takes those on internet. Rest of them actually bust her weak case open. She did really poor job of presenting and defending her opinion, presented her opinion as fact without proof for that, and finally all that is built upon ideology that is, again, far from proven and torn apart by facts constantly.Ragsnstitches said:Anita has an opinion? Deserves to be attacked at every possible oppurtunity and desperate attempts to turn into some kind of counter-culture villain. Oh so she's a scammer? Well that claim was made and is still been made despite the fact she has up to this point followed closely to her projected goals and promises. The fact her videos aren't earth shattering is also somehow indicative of Anitas deception.
Hapler incident is tragic thing. It started as really stupid lashing out by small homophobic really loud minority. And it ended on one of the saddest things in gaming history. This is problem that, unfortunately, can?t be really solved. Internet is largely anonymous if you are careful (many could track you down anyway but vast majority doesn?t have neither skill not equipment and access). Assholes are everywhere and you can't escape them in real life and even less online.Ragsnstitches said:Hepler wrote some shit for Bioware and has the audacity to have an opinion? Is the reason for all that is wrong with gaming and deserves an onslaught of abuse. Forget the fact that the things she said (about skipping gameplay) were made years ago without much of a shitstorm (it was there), but suddenly her leaving bioware is the best fucking thing ever. Because that passionless ***** must have been responsible for the disgraceful handling of: ME3's ending, Dragon Age 2's reduced development time, EA's horrid DLC practices and the refocusing towards mutliplayer components in an excusively single player franchise. Good riddance I hope her kids die of aids.
Would you imagine that? Product aimed on male audience is tested on males? I could never imagine such thing. I mean they have men testing vibrators since someone might buy one... And there was 50/50 representation on test screening of Twilight movies for sure. You have really missed hereRagsnstitches said:Marketing discrimination. We here this constantly:
Male only focus testers. Because women don't play games, so we make games for men, so we get men to tell us what they want, which makes the appeal of the game gender focused, meaning it is less appealing for women but women don't play games?
Male centric cover art. If she isn't showing tits or ass she is going to the back of the box.
Male centric marketing campaigns. If we have women in the game, let's completely ignore them and show all the men shooting stuff. Bioshock Infinites ad spot had this. For all the ad would tell us, all Booker would be doing in the game is rescuing some freaking Disney princess from cartoon villains. Despite Ken Levines "This is Elizabeths story" they certainly didn't try and sell it as such... I wonder why.
And in games geared towards women male characters are represented as female audience wants to see them. It's all about target audience. I don't like to be represented as one dimensional rich Antonio Banderas wanabe but that is stereotype many women love and, therefore get. And they have every right to get it. Just like I have the right to get my Mai Shiranui.Ragsnstitches said:Gratuitous sexualisation of Women (this is a wider media problem, but it still relates heavily to this topic). A woman can rarely just be a character with irrelevant female genitalia, they have to be a Token female character with mandatory sex appeal and must make the player feel good about themselves by telling us how awesome we are (both Elizabeth AND alyx vance do this, despite the fact that they are both meant to be strong independent characters... not ego masturbatory aids)
I never had problem with people playing roles to earn money or get attention. Now why would you try to get that from gamers I don't know. But I do understand that some people are just butthurt, and lash out and that other have been burnt. Never understood the whole commotion though.Ragsnstitches said:"Fake Girl gamers" (with no male equivalent that receives even a fraction of the abuse these people get). There is some sort of hidden qualification that all men have, but women have to take oral exams over (the "nerd cred" shit...)
An extension of this is the victim complex a LOT of Men have as "hardcore" gamers and nerds, and they see women as the quintessential "casual" who needs to be put through some sort of gauntlet to qualify as a gamer or a nerd, if not be sneered at or accosted for having the gall to step into our play spaces.
Actually this is making of Feminists and pro feminist journalists. You are knocking on the wrong door here. Sure some have jumped on the bandwagon but wider community jumped on them. Rare but satisfying sight. Feminists and journalists are out of the reach though.Ragsnstitches said:Boot Girls been treated like a plague despite the fact they are only doing a job (it's like abusing a clerk because the multi conglomerate he works for overcharges). This is also part of the Male Centric Marketing. Either way the women lose out. They get flaunted off by marketers for male audiences, then get abused by the male audiences becuase they have the audacity to look pretty and make you "feel tingly in your pee pee".
Ah, well, women are relatively rare sight in many game spaces, When someone lashes out, that person usually hinges upon the difference. Therefore its "*****, make me a sandwich and stop ruining my game" but also "Those damn niggers found a way to steal kills of the score table", "*****, go back to gluing those shoes", "god damn gays gaying up my space, I feel filthy now" etc. While really bad in every single case, rarely it's sign of hatred. Rather sign of bad self control and lack of social skills/dicipline. And, again, unless it's on regulated space there is nothing you can do about it. Even if it is in the regulated space it can be hard to prove that behavior and that's exactly why they feel free to do it.Ragsnstitches said:Disproportionate and highly gender specific abuse on public gaming spaces (Fat Ugly Slutty is often posted on these topics, I'm not going to bother, you can google it yourself since I figure you wouldn't even click the link if I did post it... it's also far from the only source of this stuff). This isn't exclusive to women, but many minorities. Yeah yeah, it's just trolling, keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better... people are never assholes just for the sake of it, they are always projecting something that they hold to personally.
Oh this is horrible. Someone got hurt in his love life and pours out his heart. Is there anything more evil in this world? Would you know, everyone complains about target sex when they feel betrayed by someone that person loved or still loves. Be it male or female, straight or homosexual or even zoofiliac love interest. That is a little known syndrome called "human nature". I dare you to casually aproach woman who had her heart broken in last 48 hours. Chances are, you are going to get to live through a bit of that generalization.Ragsnstitches said:Friendzone topics. Fuck that noise; somehow an individuals incompetence reflects poorly on an entire gender? Do you ever here of Gay friendzones used in absolute sincerity?. Heck, a recent topic on THIS site was titled "Why are women so fickle?". As if the authors piss poor luck is somehow indicative of an entire gender.
Which can be said for you too.Ragsnstitches said:So many things brought up on women on even this site (which is one of the better sites to discuss these topics with general audience) stem from convictions made from ignorance.
I'm usually unsatisfied by looking at problem, i need to find a solution which quite often can be next to impossible to do. Also, I like to think that every human being is capable of concluding that his/het/it's views are not meant for everyone and that everyone deserves to consume his prefered entertainment as long as it objectively doesn't hurt others. And game characters don't hurt women, not in a million years.Ragsnstitches said:I am not claiming you are a perpatrator of these things, I'm just saying you must be willfully blind not to see some connection. These things are a systemic issue, not a slew of totally unrelated problems.
No she wasn't. Before her opinions were even made she was attacked. A lot of which were targeted at her gender, ethnicity and appearance (a veritable trifecta of online asshatery). Try again.Olikar said:This has nothing to do with sexism, she was attacked because her opinions are vile and in direct contradiction with values most sane people have for art.Ragsnstitches said:Anita has an opinion? Deserves to be attacked at every possible oppurtunity and desperate attempts to turn into some kind of counter-culture villain.
Again nothing to with sexism.Hepler wrote some shit for Bioware and has the audacity to have an opinion? Is the reason for all that is wrong with gaming and deserves an onslaught of abuse.
citation needed.Male only focus testers. Because women don't play games, so we make games for men, so we get men to tell us what they want, which makes the appeal of the game gender focused, meaning it is less appealing for women but women don't play games?
Male centric cover art. If she isn't showing tits or ass she is going to the back of the box.
A worthless bit of anecdotal evidence that tells us nothing beyond how BI specifically was marketed.Male centric marketing campaigns. If we have women in the game, let's completely ignore them and show all the men shooting stuff. Bioshock Infinites ad spot had this. For all the ad would tell us, all Booker would be doing in the game is rescuing some freaking Disney princess from cartoon villains. Despite Ken Levines "This is Elizabeths story" they certainly didn't try and sell it as such... I wonder why.
Sexualisation is not inherently indicative of sexism.Gratuitous sexualisation of Women (this is a wider media problem, but it still relates heavily to this topic).
Where as male characters are so well written and human? Could it not be that disposable female characters is indicative of bad writing in video games not sexism?A woman can rarely just be a character with irrelevant female genitalia, they have to be a Token female character with mandatory sex appeal and must make the player feel good about themselves by telling us how awesome we are.
Any evidence to back up the claim this attitude is more than just a handful of people getting angry on internet forums?An extension of this is the victim complex a LOT of Men have as "hardcore" gamers and nerds, and they see women as the quintessential "casual" who needs to be put through some sort of gauntlet to qualify as a gamer or a nerd, if not be sneered at or accosted for having the gall to step into our play spaces.
Again do you have any evidence that women are disproportionately insulted while playing games?Disproportionate and highly gender specific abuse on public gaming spaces
Wow more worthless anecdotal tripe! I sure am convinced.(Fat Ugly Slutty is often posted on these topics, I'm not going to bother, you can google it yourself since I figure you wouldn't even click the link if I did post it... it's also far from the only source of this stuff)
Anecdotal, no evidence its widespread and not a small minority etc etc yada yadaHeck, a recent topic on THIS site was titled "Why are women so fickle?". As if the authors piss poor luck is somehow indicative of an entire gender.
Love this comic, made by young adult woman. Just to ilustrate that everyone generalizes.chaosord said:Friendzone topics. Fuck that noise; somehow an individuals incompetence reflects poorly on an entire gender? Do you ever here of Gay friendzones used in absolute sincerity?. Heck, a recent topic on THIS site was titled "Why are women so fickle?". As if the authors piss poor luck is somehow indicative of an entire gender.
Do you have a single shred of evidence to say that she wouldn't have been attacked as much if she has been a man? I really doubt you do, you're just asserting this because it suits you're opinion.Ragsnstitches said:No she wasn't. Before her opinions were even made she was attacked. A lot of which were targeted at her gender, ethnicity and appearance (a veritable trifecta of online asshatery). Try again.
Oh right you're one of those people you group the majority of criticism and attacks with a small minority of trolls, yay for intellectual dishonesty!
Yes it is, in part. It was a disproportionate reaction and a delayed one at that. It seems people are now just kneejerking as soon as a woman does anything in this industry.
Well I'll take that as "I don't have any evidence but will pretend I do!".I couldn't be arsed. I'm well aware of the value of citing source materials, but this stuff is brought up constantly on these forums. If you aren't aware of them then you aren't clued in and I couldn't not be arsed engaging with people who are playing catch up.
No because even that would be irrelevant, certain products are marketed toward genders to maximise profits, it has nothing to with sexism.You love that word, "anecdotal", don't you. BI was a specific example yes. Do you want me to go through all the games that have marketed themselves towards specific genders? Because, unsurprisingly I would find it easier to show the ones that don't.
Well from studying science at uni for 4 years I can tell you anecdotal evidence rarely has anything to do with objectivity it's almost always suffers from confirmation bias. You can look at so and so games and say something like %80 of game are marketed towards men but this doesn't tell you anything other than %80 of game are aimed at men, someone who would use this as evidence for sexism would have no logical reason to think so but would do so out of personal bias.You do know that Anecdotal is not a catch all term right? The fact you just exclaim "Anecdotal!" and dismiss everything said shows how unwilling you are to look at this subject objectively.
Exactly, so when you behave like sexism in games is an objective fact and that we are simply ignoring it or can't see it you are doing nothing more than asserting your beliefs as objective reality. This is my problem with most of these Anita types, they attempt to frame the subject of sexism as if it where an objective point to be disproved or proved when it's closer to a philosophical or political problem to be discussed an debated.What about evidence to the contrary? Whatever I say now (or you say too, for that matter) is only going to be anecdotal since there is no established metric for gauging these problems.
No I don't, but unlike you I don't assume my viewpoint is stronger on any objective terms and acknowledge my viewpoint may not be valid to you.Since you use "Anecdotal" like a bomber uses carpet bombing I assume in your mind your viewpoint is just as weak as my own.
I don't, its ludicrous to think there is an objective answer to the question of supposed sexism in gaming.The thing is, if you are arguing for objective reasoning,
And all the claims of supposed sexism in games are entirely unfalsifiable.you must also accept falsifiability as a necessary component.