Should I buy Starcraft 2?

Recommended Videos

Joccaren

Elite Member
Mar 29, 2011
2,601
3
43
Rack said:
Starcraft does have a decent level of strategy in it at very high levels, the thing is that clicky click is absolutely dominant at low-mid level. If you want a strategy game Starcraft is an awful choice because you have to tolerate a ridiculous amount of speed-training before you get to the point where strategy is going to make the difference. If you want a game which calls on that level of click-speed then Starcraft is a fine choice, if it's something you're prepared to tolerate to get a strategy game it's a truly awful choice.
The fast clicking is the result of the game being fast paced. Any game that is slower is not going to require as much fast clicking. Though I will admit most people in lower leagues tend to click fest. It always amazed my allies and I when someone would just move their army, or even just attack move it, hoping it would manage itself. Not in Starcraft. You have to manage everything.

I play most types of RTS, though I must admit I have never actually played Frozen Synapse. I generally prefer the faster gameplay Starcraft offers as I am constantly doing something, in a number of games (Sins of a Solar Empire) I find myself waiting for my army to get somewhere, which at times takes 10 minutes, watching a battle take place that lasts anywhere from 5 minutes to an hour, all dependent on the sizes of each army, the makeup, and whether both sides continue to build units into the fight.
On the other hand, Starcraft is almost too fast paced, and you will need some practice to get some speed up. Battles last seconds, maybe a minute if your really lucky, and you constantly have to be doing something. It is the reason I usually limit myself to 5 or so matches in a row. I tend to concentrate too much on everything, and the strain ends up taking its toll. I probably should ease up a bit, but I'm just used to intensely concentrating on the game.

In the end, it all just comes down to preference, and what game style you prefer. Both have their charms, and their problems, but I personally need both kinds to balance each other out dependent on what mood I'm in. Both have pretty much the same amount of strategy, those strategies just sometimes require a different ways of thinking.

Eh, any game is worth a try if its got a demo, you only loose you time. If you like it, then good for you, if you don't, then no harm done.
Just more of my two cents worth.
 

babinro

New member
Sep 24, 2010
2,518
0
0
I'd say yes if only for the single player campaign. Great campaign and fun replayable missions that are a challenge on brutal difficulty. Totally worth my $60.00.

If you're solely getting the game for multiplayer I have no recommendations. I've heard that the rule of thumb is that it is fun, but expect to lose about 9 out of 10 games you play. If you don't mind losing at games in the hope that you'll learn from your mistakes, than SC2 is probably a good buy for you multiplayer as well.
 

rwege

New member
Nov 12, 2009
69
0
0
Joccaren said:
rwege said:
Lol you have no need to defend yourself against someone who sites using "60 voidrays to kill anything"

He clearly doens't play 1s, and as such has no right to comment on your rank or your builds.
I challenge you then, lets go back to before the multiple void ray nerfs, and I'll pit my 60 voids against whatever army you decide to make.

The voids win. There was a reason that their damage was greatly reduced, their speed upgrade was removed, and a number of patches came out addressing this issue. Let me get my voids that move as fast (or barely slower) than a viking, or maybe mutas, hit 48 dps or so and will kill most units in seconds. Personally, your best bets are pheonixes. Marines have too little hp (they die in 1.2 seconds or so), Vikings are armoured and thus take extra damage, Thors are armoured and take extra damage and hydras don't have a lot of hp, and die slightly slower than a marine.
I'm not saying 60 VR's are weak. I'm saying anyone using them as a metric is a broken argument. There are no viable situations in a 1s match where you would end up having that many VR's, beyond some massive techswitch in a game where you have 7 bases going, and you have the gas stocked to make 12 stargates, and by some act of god your cols+gateway units are getting crushed. ( not to mention they are 3 supply and that would leave you with 20 probes )

Oh and you never actually replied to what I said, just picked a meaningless part of the argument and dove-in on some giant explanation,

Bronze league mabye?