Should women strength train? Yup

Recommended Videos

blackrave

New member
Mar 7, 2012
2,020
0
0
Totally
I always had a thing for strong women
2 things though
1)Don't overburn fat
2)Don't use steroids
1st will burn your breasts away, while 2nd will turn you into muscle slab
And there is nothing feminine in breastless meat brick (or in my honest opinion- attractive)
 

Xan Krieger

Completely insane
Feb 11, 2009
2,918
0
0
blackrave said:
Totally
I always had a thing for strong women
2 things though
1)Don't overburn fat
2)Don't use steroids
1st will burn your breasts away, while 2nd will turn you into muscle slab
And there is nothing feminine in breastless meat brick (or in my honest opinion- attractive)
I have the same opinion of women with muscles, there are few things as hot.

On a personal level (I'm male btw) I've recently started a diet because I was getting a tad...large so I'm starting to get the opinion that everyone should do it, even a little. Just seems to me now that it's part of maintaining your body like showering or brushing your teeth. A week ago I'd have laughed at the thought of me ever saying this but then I got the results of some tests on my blood and according to that I'm kinda really unhealthy despite not feeling like it.
 

Jarsh82

New member
Sep 17, 2012
172
0
0
Of course its not a path unto itself. Its training; a tool to help you live better. I would say its much more than just acceptance within a community though that is true as well. The point of learning is not just the act of learning. It's gaining knowledge and applying that knowledge to your life. Strength training is the same way. You learn a lot about yourself through physical training and it is impossible to grow physically without growing mentally as well. It may not be intuitive to you but ask any athlete and they will say the same thing. People can become to one dimensional in their training and use it to hide from their problems but that is true of any activity. It could be true of a career or music or art. That doesn't make these things problematic in themselves, only in the execution. If some one is using physical training to exercise their own demons, how is that a bad thing? How is it a waste of time? Physical fitness is a small thing if you make it a small thing, if you make it merely about physical appearance. This is true of everything in your life.
 

Vivi22

New member
Aug 22, 2010
2,300
0
0
BigTuk said:
I've got no problem with muscular women, but that said, many women are afraid of strength training because it can and will make a woman look less feminine if done to excess. This is true,
No it won't. The majority of women can't, and won't, end up looking like body builders because they strength train. They'd have to be specifically training and eating to do nothing but become a body builder for that to even be a real concern, and even then it probably won't happen for most. I know quite a few women who strength train and have deadlifts well past the 300lb mark and the numbers to match in other strength movements and none of them look less feminine. Stronger and healthier sure, but they don't look like men by a long shot. Hell, most of them are pretty tiny to be honest with you.

Secondly you don't do strength training to lose weight
Strength training is one of the most effective ways to burn body fat since it increases metabolism and lean muscle mass. Even accounting for the muscle people tend to put on when they do it, people who include strength training as part of their regular exercise are generally going to have an easier time losing weight than people who don't.
 

Jarsh82

New member
Sep 17, 2012
172
0
0
briankoontz said:
It's more than a little curious when people speak about weight training as if it's something to be proud of. It's physical activity for no positive purpose in and of itself, and for reason which typically amounts to vanity ("looking good").

Only for people whose alternative is an irrelevant existence without lifting weights ought to prefer an irrelevant existence with lifting weights, but such people should become a lot more ambitious about their lives than looking to the gym.

As for "self esteem" - vain people always have high self esteem - they think very highly of themselves. Only twisted cultures celebrate such a thing.

Of the hundreds of people I most admire and look up to, not a single one has probably ever lifted weights. It's completely unnecessary.
Strength training isn't about looking good to most people. You're confusing strength training with bodybuilding. I'm am curious about your ambitious life. Apparently you don't have a spare moment in the day as every moment is filled with only really important things. I would say vain people have low self esteem. They are so concerned with how they look because they are afraid of what other people will think of them. Strength training isn't about how you look. Strength is only unnecessary if you choose to have a completely stationary life. If you choose that life then you will be in poor health by your thirties. Anything you do can be worthwhile if you make it so. Strength training, when properly executed, can teach you patience and planning. It can teach you perseverance. As for self esteem, that doesn't mean you think you're "hot." I love to see people come in to the gym, new to training, and say that they aren't the type of person who lifts weights. After months of work and they're jerking their body weight over their head they find out something about themselves. They realize that they are capable of so much more than they ever thought possible. They become ambitious with their life, not just in their training but with everything. That's what I mean when I say self esteem.
 

LetalisK

New member
May 5, 2010
2,769
0
0
Pieturli said:
Lastly, if you are in need of losing bodyfat and getting into condition, long slow distance is not the way to go. I mean it works, but it is criminally inefficient and the best way there is for losing useful bodyweight. High intensity interval training is the way to go. Hill sprints, for example.
I would say that long slow distances are, in general, a waste of time unless you're training specifically for such a sport. I've found doing wind sprints increases both my sprinting and long distance cardio capacity while long distance does diddly for my sprinting(though, that may have something to do with doing wind sprints for 6 miles...). Not to mention that long slow distances are so boring I want to eat a bullet doing them. The only thing I use long slow distances for is if my legs are very sore and stiff, in which case it does a magnificent job in loosening them up and speeding along the recovery process.
 

Jarsh82

New member
Sep 17, 2012
172
0
0
LetalisK said:
Pieturli said:
Lastly, if you are in need of losing bodyfat and getting into condition, long slow distance is not the way to go. I mean it works, but it is criminally inefficient and the best way there is for losing useful bodyweight. High intensity interval training is the way to go. Hill sprints, for example.
I would say that long slow distances are, in general, a waste of time unless you're training specifically for such a sport. I've found doing wind sprints increases both my sprinting and long distance cardio capacity while long distance does diddly for my sprinting(though, that may have something to do with doing wind sprints for 6 miles...). Not to mention that long slow distances are so boring I want to eat a bullet doing them. The only thing I use long slow distances for is if my legs are very sore and stiff, in which case it does a magnificent job in loosening them up and speeding along the recovery process.
I cut ten minutes off my half marathon time by ditching running. Instead I did a little bit of sprinting, some strongman routines and barbell complexes. I also did a lot of circuit training. Of course I was never a great runner.
 

Pieturli

New member
Mar 15, 2012
182
0
0
LetalisK said:
Pieturli said:
Lastly, if you are in need of losing bodyfat and getting into condition, long slow distance is not the way to go. I mean it works, but it is criminally inefficient and the best way there is for losing useful bodyweight. High intensity interval training is the way to go. Hill sprints, for example.
I would say that long slow distances are, in general, a waste of time unless you're training specifically for such a sport. I've found doing wind sprints increases both my sprinting and long distance cardio capacity while long distance does diddly for my sprinting(though, that may have something to do with doing wind sprints for 6 miles...). Not to mention that long slow distances are so boring I want to eat a bullet doing them. The only thing I use long slow distances for is if my legs are very sore and stiff, in which case it does a magnificent job in loosening them up and speeding along the recovery process.

Exactly. I have to admit I've been letting my conditioning slide a little bit lately, really should get back to the tire flips and stuff.


I have also found that long slow distance works pretty awesome as recovery. I just go for a reasonable length walk pretty much every evening after training, loosens stuff up really nicely.
 

Boris Goodenough

New member
Jul 15, 2009
1,428
0
0
Once you've hit a decent running pace and no longer get tired from it, HIIT (high intensity interval trianing) does more for your body than regular running and you don't need to run as far, actually it's best if you keep it under 5 km per run (knees and other joints) max 3 times a week (because the body should be pushed much further if you lead a regular life).

Also I would suggest looking into kettlebells, I've personally grown very fund of it. However get someone who is a kettlebell instructor, rather than somebody who isn't otherwise you might ruin your back.
The core strenght that it has given me has done me good for BJJ.
 

Saulkar

Regular Member
Legacy
Aug 25, 2010
3,142
2
13
Country
Canuckistan
Definitely! I know a couple of girls at my gym who are in their late forties who look as if they are still in their early thirties and the 35 year female old gym owner does not look a day over 25.

I myself workout 4 days a week for an hour and a half. 3.5 miles and thirty minutes on the treadmill with a five minute, 3MPH cooldown followed by an hour of a power lifting-bodybuilding hybrid of exercises.

Check out those sexeh boobies!

Legs Tomorrow!

 

Seydaman

New member
Nov 21, 2008
2,494
0
0
I did some briefly in the past

It was pretty much the most pleasant kind of exercise I've had, cardio is the bane of my existence

But I can't do it right now (or likely ever) because of medical stuff |:

I hear Yoga is good for you...
 
Mar 26, 2008
3,429
0
0
Women should do whatever the hell they like. If that's strength training, more power to them.

I'm rocketing toward my late 30's and my left knee is carrying some minor damage so I can't go jogging. My back has taken a fair amount of abuse over the years, so I'm starting to think lifting weights is doing more harm than good. What I am thinking of doing is DDP Yoga. Being a wrestling fan I've been reading about Diamond Dallas Page's variation on yoga and from what I've seen it looks like it would help strength, core conditioning, flexibility and on top of this be easy on the joints. I'm in fairly good shape for my age, but am having difficulty shedding the spare tire. It's not that bad, but considering the rest of me is fairly svelte it's noticeable.